主体与审美形态的交互关系研究
[Abstract]:The interaction between subject and aesthetic form is the core issue to be discussed here. The transcendentalism, the essence theory, has puzzled the aesthetic research for a long time, which makes the esthetics research often deviate from the realistic esthetic activity. Aesthetics is fundamentally a practical problem rather than a priori problem. Beauty comes into being and develops in aesthetic practice. Subject is the initiator of aesthetic practice and aesthetic form is the cultural achievement of aesthetic practice. They form a complicated interaction in aesthetic practice. By deeply analyzing the interaction between the two and the mechanism of their formation and their role in aesthetic culture, we can not only understand the formation and development of beauty, but also understand the subject of aesthetics. We can also understand the subjectivity of human beings and the aesthetic and cultural conditions in which we live. Subject and aesthetic form are a pair of important concepts in human aesthetic practice. The interaction between them promotes the development and evolution of each other as well as the development and evolution of aesthetic practice and culture. Through the in-depth analysis of the interaction between the two, the aesthetic research on the subject of the question, the beauty will be a new face. Subject and aesthetic form are important variable elements in the process of civilization. Through the interaction between the two, we can not only understand the creative role of human subjective consciousness in aesthetic practice, but also understand the creative role of human subjective consciousness in the formation of aesthetic form. At the same time, we can also understand that aesthetic form, as a symbol representation system of civilization, plays an important role in the construction of human subjectivity. They are not only the expression of civilization process, but also the driving force of civilization development. The mutual development of the two guarantees the intercommunion of aesthetic values and aesthetic practice between the subjects in the civilized community, promotes the formation of the aesthetic culture recognized by the civilized community, and thus ensures the sustained existence of civilization in the aesthetic dimension.
【学位授予单位】:西北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:I01
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 聂振斌;什么是审美文化?[J];北京社会科学;1997年02期
2 滕守尧;大众文化不等于审美文化[J];北京社会科学;1997年02期
3 朱立元;何为“审美文化”[J];大连大学学报;1998年01期
4 王建疆;;审美形态新论[J];甘肃社会科学;2007年04期
5 杨恩寰;黑格尔论艺术创造的主体性[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1984年04期
6 牛军;;美:来自天人之际的消息——中国审美形态刍议[J];河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年06期
7 张瑜;康德论美的鉴赏与创造的主体性[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1988年04期
8 苏宏斌;;主体性·主体间性·后主体性——当代中国美学的三元结构[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年02期
9 李鸿雁;;中西审美主体比较[J];黑龙江社会科学;2007年02期
10 朱晓军;美学研究的范式转换:从主体性到主体间性[J];理论学刊;2005年07期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 孙丽巍;“主体性”视野下的康德、克罗齐美学思想[D];黑龙江大学;2001年
2 黄文正;论马克思的实践主体性[D];四川师范大学;2005年
3 范玲娜;审美形态与文化差异[D];西南师范大学;2005年
4 张文通;海德格尔的主体间性美学思想[D];厦门大学;2006年
5 唐传开;康德哲学主体性思维研究[D];广西师范大学;2007年
6 高娴;当代中国草根文化符号的审美研究[D];中南民族大学;2008年
,本文编号:2219123
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2219123.html