当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 艺术理论论文 >

躁动的现代艺术之梦——20世纪20-30年代中国现代艺术运动及传播研究

发布时间:2018-09-11 14:10
【摘要】: 20世纪,西方现代艺术对中国乃至整个世界艺术发展的影响是不容忽视的。它发源于欧洲的中心,通过各种方式和途径传播到世界各地。在中国,开始只是一些零星的个人和媒体的介绍,影响是微弱的。但是到了20年代末,中国才爆发了声势较大的现代艺术运动。以林风眠在北京发起的“北京艺术大会”为前奏,然后是1928年以西湖国立艺专为依托的艺术运动社,继而是1931年的决澜社,再就是1934年中华独立美术协会。在30年代的众多艺术团体中,只有这三个团体对于现代艺术的宣传在当时才造成了一定的影响。他们由于时代的要求或者个人兴趣的发展而追求宣扬现代艺术,发起现代艺术运动,从而影响了一批人;他们以运动的方式把西方现代艺术流派从发源地传播到中国的大地上,这些都是无可争议的事实。但是,这些运动本身并不是一样的组织和一样的成员以及一样的主张等等,而且成立的经过和时间都各不相同。也因此,这些艺术运动对西方现代派艺术的传播过程及传播效果也是不尽相同的。早期传播学的奠基人,美国著名的政治学家,哈罗德·拉斯韦尔于1948年在其《传播在社会中的结构与功能》一文中提出传播过程:谁(Who)→说什么(Says What)→通过什么渠道(in Which Channel)→对谁(to Whom)→取得什么效果(With what effects)。简称“五W”模式。受传播学的启发,本文将西方现代派艺术在20世纪20-30年代通过各个现代艺术团体而进入中国的过程看作是一个传播的过程,,将西方各现代派艺术作为被传播的信息。对艺术运动社、决澜社、中华独立美术协会三大现代艺术传播主体在传播过程中的各要素进行梳理,然 后在这些梳理的基础上对它们进一步的比较和分析,最后能在这些要素中得出 中国现代艺术团体在2卜30年代传播的一般认识,即传播模式。在传播学的意 义上来理解、分析、认识三大现代艺术运动对西方现代派艺术传播的异同和不 足之处,为阐释现代艺术运动在中国的结局提供另一个佐证。
[Abstract]:In the 20 th century, the influence of western modern art on the development of art in China and the whole world can not be ignored. It originated in the heart of Europe and spread around the world in a variety of ways and means. In China, at first it was only sporadic personal and media presentations, and the impact was weak. But it was only in the late 1920s that China broke out a powerful modern art movement. "Beijing Art Congress" sponsored by Lin Fengmian in Beijing is the prelude, followed by the Art Movement Society of West Lake National College of Arts in 1928, then the 1931 Society of decision Lan, and the Chinese Independent Fine Arts Association in 1934. Of the many art groups in the 1930's, only these three groups had a certain influence on the propaganda of modern art at that time. Because of the demands of the times or the development of their personal interests, they pursued and propagated modern art and launched a modern art movement, thus affecting a group of people; they spread the western modern art schools from their birthplaces to the land of China by way of movement. These are indisputable facts. However, these movements themselves are not the same organization and the same members, the same ideas and so on, and the process and time of their establishment are different. Therefore, these artistic movements have different spreading process and effect to the western modernist art. The founder of early communication, the famous American political scientist, Harold Raswell, in 1948, in his article "the structure and function of Communication in Society", proposed the process of communication: who (Who) says what (Says What) does what through what channels (in Which Channel) can achieve what effect to whom (to Whom)? (With what effects).? Short for "five W" mode. Inspired by the theory of communication, this paper regards the process of western modernist art entering China through various modern art groups in the 2020s and 1930s as a process of communication, and regards the western modernist art as the transmitted information. Combing the elements of the three major modern art communication subjects in the process of communication, the Art Movement Society, the Zolan Society and the China Independent Fine Arts Association, However, on the basis of these combing, we further compare and analyze them. Finally, in these elements, we can get the general understanding of modern Chinese art groups in the 1930's, that is, the mode of communication. To understand and analyze the meaning of communication, Understanding the similarities and differences of the three modern art movements to the dissemination of western modernist art provides another evidence to explain the outcome of the modern art movement in China.
【学位授予单位】:四川大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2003
【分类号】:J120.9

【引证文献】

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 郑涛;民国前期(1912-1936)西方现代木刻在中国的传播[D];中央美术学院;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 梁宜;二十世纪三十年代艺风社美术展览研究[D];浙江大学;2011年



本文编号:2236914

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2236914.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c8e10***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com