艾柯的文本诠释理论研究
发布时间：2018-11-10 12:18
【摘要】：安贝托·艾柯,意大利人,在符号学、美学、文化批评、小说创作等多个研究领域都有突出贡献。国外对艾柯的研究起步早,学术队伍庞大,取得了许多重要的研究成果,而国内对艾柯的研究起步较晚,缺乏多角度、全面、深刻的研究。本文着重对艾柯的文本诠释理论进行研究和探讨,与以往学术界对艾柯诠释学理论研究不同的是,本文提供了一种新的研究思路和研究方法,即在深入、细致地研读艾柯著作的基础上,对其诠释学理论的思想来源、发展脉络和实践走向进行全面地考察,多维度地阐释艾柯诠释学与其美学、符号学的联系,并结合具体的文学创作实践评析其诠释学理论,从而形成对艾柯诠释学思想的总体把握。 本文共分为八个部分：导论部分介绍艾柯的学术成就,分析艾柯诠释学理论研究的意义和研究现状,阐述论文的结构框架、研究目的、方法和创新点；第一章梳理阿奎那美学、克罗齐美学、乔伊斯美学和帕莱松的美学思想,主要从形式理论和解释理论两个方面分析艾柯美学思想,揭示艾柯文本诠释学形成的美学渊源,进而把握艾柯美学与其诠释学的关系；第二章阐述索绪尔、叶姆斯列夫、皮尔士等人的符号学思想,把握艾柯三元符号学理论的来源和内涵,通过对无限符号论和神秘主义符指论的比较,明确开放性诠释理论和过度诠释理论的不同依据,分析艾柯的文本符号学,揭示艾柯符号学与其诠释学的联系；第三章正式步入艾柯的诠释学理论研究,通过对诠释学发展历程的梳理,提出艾柯的诠释态度：提倡诠释,反对过度诠释,提出诠释应有界限；第四章重点分析过度诠释,通过艾柯与罗蒂、卡勒的论争,引出艾柯对过度诠释的批判,艾柯提出用文本意图来限制文本诠释的盲目无限性；第五章明确艾柯提出的诠释的界限,侧重对文本意图的研究和评析,注重把握文本意图、模范读者和模范作者在文本诠释中发挥的作用和局限性；第六章将艾柯的诠释理论与其小说创作实践相结合,通过小说作品检验诠释理论的应用性和可操作性；结语总结并评价艾柯的诠释学理论,包括其理论的优势和创新点、理论的不足之处、理论的意义和借鉴价值等。 总之,本文力图在全面搜集、整理、阅读、运用原版英文资料的基础上减少对艾柯诠释理论的误读,能够准确理解和分析其诠释学理论。一方面,本文不局限于对其诠释理论的分析,而是从美学、符号学、文艺批评和小说创作等多种角度展开,试图构建把握艾柯诠释学与其美学、符号学等方面思想之间的联系,形成诠释理论体系；另一方面,通过对艾柯具体文学作品的分析揭示艾柯诠释学的理论优势和局限性,为当代中国的诠释学理论和实践提供反思和借鉴。
[Abstract]:Anberto Eco, an Italian, has made outstanding contributions in many fields of semiotics, aesthetics, cultural criticism, fiction creation and so on. The research on Eco in foreign countries started early, the academic team is huge, and many important research results have been obtained. However, the domestic research on Eco started late, lacking of multi-angle, comprehensive and profound research. This paper focuses on the research and discussion of Eco's text interpretation theory. Different from the previous academic research on Eco's hermeneutics theory, this paper provides a new way of thinking and research, that is, in depth. On the basis of careful reading of Eco's works, the author makes a comprehensive investigation on the ideological source, development context and practice trend of his hermeneutics theory, and explains the connection between Eco's hermeneutics and his aesthetics and semiotics in many dimensions. Combined with the practice of literary creation, the hermeneutics theory is evaluated, thus forming the overall grasp of Eco's hermeneutics thought. This paper is divided into eight parts: the introduction introduces the academic achievements of Eco, analyzes the significance and research status of Eco's hermeneutics theory, and expounds the structure, purpose, method and innovation of the thesis; The first chapter combs Aquinas aesthetics, Croce aesthetics, Joyce aesthetics and Paleson's aesthetic thought, mainly analyzes Eco's aesthetic thought from two aspects of form theory and interpretation theory, and reveals the aesthetic origin of Eco's text hermeneutics. Then grasp the relationship between Eco aesthetics and its hermeneutics; The second chapter expounds Saussure, Yemslev, Peirce and others' semiotics thoughts, grasps the origin and connotation of Eco's ternary semiotics theory, and compares infinite symbolism with mysticism. The paper clarifies the different bases of open interpretation theory and excessive interpretation theory, analyzes Eco's textual semiotics, and reveals the relationship between Eco semiotics and its hermeneutics. The third chapter formally steps into Eco's hermeneutics theory research, through combing the development course of hermeneutics, puts forward Eco's hermeneutic attitude: advocating interpretation, opposing excessive interpretation, proposing the limits of interpretation; The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of over-interpretation, through the argument between Eco, Rorty and Caleb, leads to Eco's criticism of over-interpretation. Eco proposes to limit the blind infinity of text interpretation by text intention. The fifth chapter clarifies the limits of Eco's interpretation, focuses on the study and analysis of text intention, and focuses on grasping the text intention, the role and limitation of the model reader and model author in the interpretation of the text. The sixth chapter combines Eco's annotation theory with his novel creation practice, and tests the applicability and maneuverability of the interpretation theory through the novel works. The conclusion summarizes and evaluates Eco's hermeneutics theory, including its theoretical advantages and innovations, theoretical shortcomings, theoretical significance and reference value. In a word, this paper tries to reduce the misreading of Eco's hermeneutics theory on the basis of collecting, sorting, reading and using the original English materials, and can accurately understand and analyze his hermeneutics theory. On the one hand, this paper is not limited to the analysis of his hermeneutics theory, but from the aesthetic, semiotics, literary criticism and novel creation and other angles, trying to build a grasp of the Eco hermeneutics and its aesthetics, semiotics, and other aspects of the relationship. Forming the system of interpretation theory; On the other hand, it reveals the theoretical advantages and limitations of Eco's hermeneutics through the analysis of his specific literary works, and provides reflection and reference for the theory and practice of hermeneutics in contemporary China.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I0
本文编号：2322454
[Abstract]:Anberto Eco, an Italian, has made outstanding contributions in many fields of semiotics, aesthetics, cultural criticism, fiction creation and so on. The research on Eco in foreign countries started early, the academic team is huge, and many important research results have been obtained. However, the domestic research on Eco started late, lacking of multi-angle, comprehensive and profound research. This paper focuses on the research and discussion of Eco's text interpretation theory. Different from the previous academic research on Eco's hermeneutics theory, this paper provides a new way of thinking and research, that is, in depth. On the basis of careful reading of Eco's works, the author makes a comprehensive investigation on the ideological source, development context and practice trend of his hermeneutics theory, and explains the connection between Eco's hermeneutics and his aesthetics and semiotics in many dimensions. Combined with the practice of literary creation, the hermeneutics theory is evaluated, thus forming the overall grasp of Eco's hermeneutics thought. This paper is divided into eight parts: the introduction introduces the academic achievements of Eco, analyzes the significance and research status of Eco's hermeneutics theory, and expounds the structure, purpose, method and innovation of the thesis; The first chapter combs Aquinas aesthetics, Croce aesthetics, Joyce aesthetics and Paleson's aesthetic thought, mainly analyzes Eco's aesthetic thought from two aspects of form theory and interpretation theory, and reveals the aesthetic origin of Eco's text hermeneutics. Then grasp the relationship between Eco aesthetics and its hermeneutics; The second chapter expounds Saussure, Yemslev, Peirce and others' semiotics thoughts, grasps the origin and connotation of Eco's ternary semiotics theory, and compares infinite symbolism with mysticism. The paper clarifies the different bases of open interpretation theory and excessive interpretation theory, analyzes Eco's textual semiotics, and reveals the relationship between Eco semiotics and its hermeneutics. The third chapter formally steps into Eco's hermeneutics theory research, through combing the development course of hermeneutics, puts forward Eco's hermeneutic attitude: advocating interpretation, opposing excessive interpretation, proposing the limits of interpretation; The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of over-interpretation, through the argument between Eco, Rorty and Caleb, leads to Eco's criticism of over-interpretation. Eco proposes to limit the blind infinity of text interpretation by text intention. The fifth chapter clarifies the limits of Eco's interpretation, focuses on the study and analysis of text intention, and focuses on grasping the text intention, the role and limitation of the model reader and model author in the interpretation of the text. The sixth chapter combines Eco's annotation theory with his novel creation practice, and tests the applicability and maneuverability of the interpretation theory through the novel works. The conclusion summarizes and evaluates Eco's hermeneutics theory, including its theoretical advantages and innovations, theoretical shortcomings, theoretical significance and reference value. In a word, this paper tries to reduce the misreading of Eco's hermeneutics theory on the basis of collecting, sorting, reading and using the original English materials, and can accurately understand and analyze his hermeneutics theory. On the one hand, this paper is not limited to the analysis of his hermeneutics theory, but from the aesthetic, semiotics, literary criticism and novel creation and other angles, trying to build a grasp of the Eco hermeneutics and its aesthetics, semiotics, and other aspects of the relationship. Forming the system of interpretation theory; On the other hand, it reveals the theoretical advantages and limitations of Eco's hermeneutics through the analysis of his specific literary works, and provides reflection and reference for the theory and practice of hermeneutics in contemporary China.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱寿兴;;艾柯的“过度诠释”在文学解读活动中并不存在[J];湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
2 马凌;玫瑰就是玫瑰[J];读书;2003年02期
3 南帆;诠释与历史语境[J];读书;1998年11期
4 蔡婷;;给诠释一个“度”——浅论艾柯的过度诠释[J];读与写(教育教学刊);2009年01期
5 闫爱华;;文本意图：一个反抗过度诠释的范畴[J];大众文艺(理论);2008年11期
6 张广奎;李燕霞;;“诗无达诂”的艾柯诠释学思考[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
7 董丽云;;创造与约束——论艾柯的阐释观[J];外语学刊;2008年01期
8 杨丽娜;亓元;;过度诠释理论对于中国古典审美接受的观照[J];华北水利水电学院学报(社科版);2010年05期
9 马凌;诠释、过度诠释与逻各斯——略论《玫瑰之名》的深层主题[J];外国文学评论;2003年01期
10 周秀萍;;昂贝多·艾柯与“过度诠释”问题[J];文学前沿;2005年01期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 董丽云;重建文本阐释的约束理论[D];福建师范大学;2008年
2 孙慧;艾柯文艺思想研究[D];山东师范大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 亓元;中国古典审美接受中的“过度诠释”[D];黑龙江大学;2007年
2 黄艳彬;论诠释的有限性及其标准[D];福建师范大学;2007年
，本文编号：2322454
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2322454.html
