蒋孔阳文艺美学思想评述及其当下之思
[Abstract]:Jiang Kongyang's aesthetic thought and literary thought are closely related, generally speaking, he is standing in the aesthetic height to examine literature and art. It is not difficult to understand his literary and artistic thoughts by understanding his thoughts on aesthetics. "Labor creates beauty", Jiang carefully discusses beauty with Marx's thought as the starting point. He thinks that beauty is not a static entity, but exists in the process of practice and creation, "beauty is the objectification of human essential power". "objectification" is regular, and "law of beauty" is to master "two scales". Art is also the objectification of man's essential power, so its essence is consistent with beauty, and the law of beauty is the law of art. The lack of imagination is one of the major drawbacks of contemporary literature and art. To the former, the spiritual character and humanistic ideal of the creative subject should be greatly improved, and the latter should be encouraged to observe and experience life more carefully. Chiang's theory of the law of beauty may be a cure for the lack of artistic imagination. Art is the concentrated embodiment of beauty, which reflects the reality by the way of artistic image. Image both individual and universal, especially typical image, but also the dialectical unity of the two. Mr. Jiang prefers the unity of the two in his personality. Mr. Jiang's typical view was born from the argument with various factions, which is more instructive to literary creation. After all, artistic creation begins with individual images in life. In the present literature and art, atypical creation is popular for a time, which reduces the profundity of literature and art and weakens the reflection on life, which has been criticized by academic circles. The complexity of today's society should be a good opportunity for typical creation. Advocating the typical creation in art will help the flame of art to burn again in the hearts of appreciators. Mr. Jiang emphasized that literature and art reflected the function of real life, but he reflected literature and art from the angle of aesthetics, so he paid more attention to the particularity of literature and art, that is, the aesthetic function of literature and art, which provided theoretical enlightenment for the later aesthetic reflection theory. "Man is the beauty of the world", beauty is the existence of people, aesthetic education is to cultivate the all-round development of people, to achieve the essence of all human beings. Mr. Jiang explored beauty from the essence of man, and finally returned to the realization of human essence, which drew a satisfactory end to the running track of beauty. Art is the concentrated embodiment of beauty, and aesthetic education is mainly carried out through art. Art is firmly opposed to pretence and ugliness, but ugliness in life can turn into beauty in art. At present, "consumer literature and art" overflow, art commercialization, entertainment, desire, ugly trend is serious. People of insight saw the importance and urgency of saving art and chanted the slogan "New Humanities Spirit". Mr. Jiang's thought of aesthetic education and the call of new humanistic spirit are consistent and still have guiding significance for the healthy development of literature and art. Mr. Jiang Kongyang's thinking on beauty, art and life is the same, but nowadays literature and art is often extreme and only pays attention to one aspect. It is undoubtedly valuable to mention Mr. Jiang's theory in the field of contemporary art. Mr. Jiang's theory also has some bias and imperfections. Fortunately, what he left us is an open system. We can inherit in criticism and develop in succession, so that Mr. Jiang's thoughts can radiate youthful brilliance in the new century.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2005
【分类号】:I01
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 侯斌英;;冯宪光对西方马克思主义文艺美学的批判性借鉴[J];新疆大学学报(哲学·人文社会科学版);2011年02期
2 刘丹;;钱谷融先生二三事[J];语文世界(中学生之窗);2011年07期
3 乔东义;;一次“夹生”的视域融合——“十七年”马克思主义文艺美学中国化历程与反思[J];上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年03期
4 阎国忠;;谁在接着朱光潜讲?——“主客观统一”说的逻辑展开[J];马克思主义美学研究;2011年01期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 郑元者;;蒋孔阳的美学道路——《蒋孔阳学术文化随笔》跋[A];中国语言文学资料信息(1999.1)[C];1999年
2 汪济生;;动物是否在自然面前永远被动和无能——评蒋孔阳及实践美学派的一种有代表性的动物观[A];2004生态美学研讨会论文集[C];2004年
3 ;中华全国美学学会第二届理事会[A];中华全国美学学会第二届年会简报[C];1983年
4 汪济生;;必须正视马克思恩格斯在人与动物界定问题上的区别[A];2004生态美学研讨会论文集[C];2004年
5 ;时代与思潮(2)中西文化冲撞目录[A];时代与思潮(4)——文化传统寻绎[C];1990年
6 陆扬;;关于后现代美学[A];中华美学学会第六届全国美学大会暨“全球化与中国美学”学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年
7 古风;;20世纪中国古代美学研究方法反思[A];2009江苏省美学学会年会“当代审美文化与艺术传统”学术研讨会会议论文集[C];2009年
8 朱存明;;《手稿》与中国美学问题[A];马列文论研究——全国马列文艺论著研究会十九届、二十届、二十一届、二十二届年会论文集[C];2002年
9 汪济生;;“劳动创造了美”还是“劳动生产了美”——对一个源自经典的美学核心命题的辨析与追踪[A];社会进步与人文素养——上海市社会科学界第四届学术年会文集(2006年度)(哲学·历史·人文学科卷)[C];2006年
10 ;上海中西哲学与文化交流研究中心机构与人员[A];时代与思潮(1)——五四反思[C];1989年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 金莹;蒋孔阳学术思想研讨会在沪举行[N];文学报;2008年
2 复旦大学中文系 郑元者;蒋孔阳:一位本身就是美学的美学家[N];社会科学报;2004年
3 钟华;蒋孔阳、叶秀山先生如何面对“学术批评”?[N];中华读书报;2008年
4 王光东 上海大学文学院;寻找“文学生命”的表达方式[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
5 卢盛江;儒家的真精神究竟何在?[N];中华读书报;2004年
6 林声;清凉的书眼[N];人民政协报;2000年
7 席扬;“学术”与“史”的可能性[N];中国文化报;2001年
8 刘隆民;落幕前的美学沉思[N];贵州政协报;2000年
9 岳洪治;文林廿八宿 错粲各有名[N];光明日报;2007年
10 魏天无;寻求对于真理的服从[N];中国图书商报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 范希春;宋代中期儒家文艺美学思想研究[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2001年
2 罗曼;蒋孔阳美学思想新释[D];山东师范大学;2009年
3 张秋婵;潘之恒研究[D];苏州大学;2008年
4 张弓;历史视野中的实践美学[D];复旦大学;2007年
5 黄健云;“特殊”与美感[D];华中师范大学;2008年
6 杨庙平;《巴黎手稿》与当代中国美学理论形态建构[D];四川大学;2007年
7 周维山;马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》与中国当代美学[D];山东大学;2007年
8 魏红珊;郭沫若美学思想研究[D];四川大学;2003年
9 苏东晓;审美无利害说与审美关系问题[D];复旦大学;2005年
10 骆冬青;二十世纪中国政治美学与文艺美学[D];南京师范大学;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 霍九仓;蒋孔阳文艺美学思想评述及其当下之思[D];华东师范大学;2005年
2 徐宁;蒋孔阳美学思想中人的主体性研究[D];安徽大学;2010年
3 李道忠;蒋孔阳美学思想研究[D];新疆大学;2010年
4 孙莉;论蒋孔阳的文学批评思想[D];华中师范大学;2001年
5 王莉;论郁达夫的文艺美学思想[D];安徽师范大学;2003年
6 张屏;情不知所起 一往而深[D];华东师范大学;2006年
7 冯瑜;蒋孔阳“美的生活”思想探论[D];西北大学;2008年
8 吴娟;论蒋孔阳的比较美学思想[D];扬州大学;2008年
9 贺丽;实践美学论争的历史考察及其哲学反思[D];黑龙江大学;2007年
10 逯爽;陈忠实文艺美学思想初探[D];西安工业大学;2010年
,本文编号:2405068
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2405068.html