基于对话语料的魏晋以前汉语道歉语研究

发布时间：2018-01-03 07:37

本文关键词：基于对话语料的魏晋以前汉语道歉语研究　出处：《暨南大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文以魏晋以前的书面语语料为研究对象,从92部文学作品中筛选出440条语料,通过对商周时期、春秋战国到秦和两汉时期的道歉语语料进行分析,总结道歉语在各个时期的道歉语类型以及标志词,研究道歉语在各个时期的变化趋势和发展脉络。通过分析本文得出了以下结论:一、随着时间的推移,道歉语的种类增多,由商周时期到两汉时期由四种增至十种,这说明人们道歉的方式越来越多样化。二、道歉语标志词的发展具有传承性和更替性,承认错误类道歉语作为最重要的道歉语,标志词由商周时期的“戾、愆”发展为春秋到秦时期的“罪、过、失、怨、咎、戾”,两汉时期为“罪、过、失、咎、负”。三、“罪、过”自出现之后就使用频率就很高,并且分为:主谓式、定中式等。四、自我贬损或责罚类在商周时期就出现了“不+X”格式,其中X为褒义词“明”;春秋到秦的X词汇更加丰富,发展为“才、德、仁、佞、肖”;两汉时期又增加了“祥”,在句式上也增加了“无+X”句式进行自我贬损。
[Abstract]:This article takes the written language corpus before Wei and Jin as the research object, selects 440 language data from 92 literary works, and analyzes the apology language data of Shang and Zhou dynasties, Spring and Autumn period and warring States period to Qin and Han dynasties. This paper summarizes the types and signs of apology in each period, studies the trend and development of apology in each period. Through the analysis of this paper, we draw the following conclusions: first, with the passage of time. The variety of apology language increased from four to ten from the Shang and Zhou dynasties to the Han Dynasty, which shows that the way of apology is more and more diversified. Secondly, the development of the sign words of apology has the nature of inheritance and replacement. As the most important apology words, the sign words developed from the Shang and Zhou dynasties'"surly, trespass" to the "crime, excessive, lost, resentful, guilty and surly" from the Spring and Autumn period to the Qin Dynasty, and the Han Dynasty was "guilty, too, lost, and guilty". Negative "three," the crime, after the emergence of the use of high frequency, and divided into: subject-predicate type, definite Chinese style, etc. Fourth, self-derogation or punishment of the class appeared in the Shang and Zhou dynasties "not X" format. X is the positive word "Ming"; The X word from Spring and Autumn to Qin is more abundant, and develops into "talent, virtue, benevolence, sycophaneity, Xiao"; In the Han Dynasty, "Xiang" was added, and "no X" sentence was added to derogate.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H131

【参考文献】