经验的结构化：伽达默尔诠释学语言性研究

发布时间：2018-01-30 10:05

本文关键词： 经验语言性语言伽达默尔诠释学　出处：《大连理工大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：语言问题是二十世纪哲学的核心议题。分析哲学强调语言逻辑分析或语义分析,并将其作为哲学的基本任务；以索绪尔为代表的现代语言学及结构主义语言学,注重分析语言本身的结构；现象学派胡塞尔则认为语言是思想的外在表现形式。可见,不同哲学流派从不同视角对语言问题进行探究,呈现出逻辑化、形式化以及符号化的研究特征,但均未能深入到语言关涉人类经验的本体性维度。在哲学诠释学视域下,伽达默尔则以人类经验为出发点,转向对语言本质的关注。本文试图在伽达默尔诠释学视域下,以语言对经验的结构化作用为研究进路,探讨语言的本质问题。论文主要从伽达默尔语言基本观点,及作为经验固化、秩序化、多样化过程的语言性四个章节进行论证。论文第一章试图界定伽达默尔以语言性为内涵的语言基本观点。语言作为人类理解的本体论视域,摆脱了符号化、工具化的传统观点,通过组织人类经验,以理解参与世界建构的方式弥合主—客二分的境遇。因此语言问题转向语言性问题。第二章主要论述作为经验固化过程的语言性。语言以概念构成事件的方式,使世界得以揭示,具有构造性。因此,在以语言为媒介的理解过程中,经验以概念的形式得以聚集储存,并通过概念化过程得以显现。第三章主要论述作为经验秩序化过程的语言性。经验通过语言内在对话结构的作用,使得效果历史意识具体化,进而在问答对话结构以事实化的形式得以持存,显现其秩序性；第四章主要论述作为经验多样化过程的语言性。语言以其多种思辨特征,加强了“揭示”与“对话”功能。这一点尤其表现在文学作品中,经验通过与文学传统对话,思辨化的世界构建等形式以更为丰富化、精细化的角度形成自身。最后文章得出结论,语言以揭示世界,内在对话结构以及思辨的表达形式等内涵性质,使得经验概念化、事实化、精细化。经验因而通过固化、秩序化以及多样化的过程形成并表述自身,进而反映伽达默尔诠释学视域下,覆盖人类在世之本体论视域,具有语言性内涵的语言观点。
[Abstract]:Language is the core issue of philosophy in 20th century. Analytic philosophy emphasizes language logic analysis or semantic analysis and regards it as the basic task of philosophy. Modern linguistics and structuralist linguistics, represented by Saussure, focus on analyzing the structure of language itself. The phenomenological school Husserl thinks that language is the external form of thought. It can be seen that different philosophical schools explore language from different perspectives and present the characteristics of logic formalization and symbolization. However, all of them fail to go deep into the Noumenon dimension of language which concerns human experience. In the field of philosophical hermeneutics, Gadamer takes human experience as the starting point. From the perspective of Gadamer's hermeneutics, this paper attempts to focus on the structuralization of language to experience. This paper mainly discusses the essence of language from the perspective of Gadamer's language, as well as as an empirical solidification and orderization. The first chapter tries to define Gadamer's basic viewpoint of language with the connotation of language. Language, as an ontological perspective of human understanding, gets rid of symbolization. A conventional view of instrumentation through the organization of human experience. Therefore, the language problem turns to the linguistic problem. The second chapter mainly discusses the language as the experience solidification process, language forms the event way by the concept. So that the world can be revealed, constructive. Therefore, in the process of understanding in the medium of language, experience is gathered and stored in the form of concepts. And through the conceptualization process can be manifested. Chapter three mainly discusses the language as the process of empirical orderization. Experience through the role of language internal dialogue structure makes the effect of historical consciousness concrete. Then, the structure of the question and answer dialogue can be maintained in the form of fact, showing its order. Chapter 4th mainly discusses the language as a process of experience diversification. Language, with its many speculative characteristics, strengthens the function of "revealing" and "dialogue", which is especially manifested in literary works. Experience forms itself through dialogue with literary tradition, speculative world construction and so on. Finally, the article draws a conclusion, language to reveal the world. Internal dialogue structure and speculative forms of expression make experience conceptualized, factual and refined. Thus, experience forms and expresses itself through the process of solidification, orderization and diversification. Furthermore, it reflects the linguistic viewpoint with linguistic connotations covering the ontological horizon of human being under the perspective of Gadamer's hermeneutics.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H0;B516.59

【参考文献】