汉语含“多”的表达形式与越南语的对应研究

发布时间：2018-02-10 17:23

本文关键词： 汉语越南语 “多” “nhiu” 偏误对应　出处：《华中科技大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在现代汉语中概数表示法是一种常用的表达方式。人们在表示不确切的数量或者不想、不需要提出确切的数目往往会选择使用一些概数词来代替。由于概数在科学、政治、经济、教育上使用的频率非常大。“多”在现代汉语中使用频率比较高而且它的表现比较活跃，同时也是个多义、多功能与多词性的词。近几年来，，有很多语法学家对“多”的词义、词性、语用功能及用法等方面进行研究并且获得不少的成果。可是专门对“多”的研究比较并不多，尤其是关于“多”在越南语中的对应表达形式似乎还没有，所以本人作为一个越南的汉语学习者在使用“多”这个概数词的过程中经常会出现很多偏误。因此本人在前人的研究基础上，通过将“多”的意义、词性、句法功能以及它的一些结构在越南语的对应形式进行对比分析从而确定概数教学中的一些教学策略与方法。本文共有四大部分：第一部分介绍本论文的研究意义、目的、方法、并简述目前有关汉语“多”和越南语的对应形式已有的研究成果。第二部分探讨汉语概数词“多”作为助词、形容词、副词在越南语中的对应形式。通过越南语的译句分析找出两者在语义上和结构上的对应形式，从而归纳出他们之间的异同。第三部分本文通过越南学生使用汉语“多”的情况调查分析偏误的原因，并提出一些教学对策。希望能够为教学和学习者提供一份有价值的参考资料。
[Abstract]:In modern Chinese, the expression of approximate number is a common expression. People often choose to use some approximate words instead of expressing the exact number or not, because the estimate is in science, politics, Economy and education are used very frequently. "duo" is used more frequently in modern Chinese and its performance is more active. At the same time, it is also a polysemous, multi-functional and multi-part of speech word. In recent years, There are many grammars who study the meaning, part of speech, pragmatic function and usage of "many" and get a lot of results. In particular, there seems to be no corresponding expression of "many" in Vietnamese. Therefore, as a Vietnamese Chinese learner, there are often many errors in the process of using the estimated word "more". Therefore, on the basis of previous studies, I use the meaning of "more", part of speech, The syntactic function and some of its structures in the corresponding form of Vietnamese language are compared and analyzed to determine some teaching strategies and methods in the teaching of estimate. There are four parts in this paper:. The first part introduces the significance, purpose and methods of this thesis, and briefly describes the existing research results on the corresponding forms of Chinese and Vietnamese. In the second part, we discuss the corresponding forms of the Chinese word "more" as auxiliary words, adjectives and adverbs in Vietnamese, and find out their corresponding forms in semantic and structural terms by analyzing the translation of Vietnamese. To sum up the similarities and differences between them. In the third part, the author analyzes the reasons of errors through the investigation of Vietnamese students' use of Chinese "more", and puts forward some teaching countermeasures, hoping to provide a valuable reference for teaching and learners.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H44;H146

【相似文献】