网络多人交互语境中冒犯性不同意的语用研究

发布时间：2018-02-22 11:45

本文关键词： 冒犯不同意网络多人会话不礼貌　出处：《广东外语外贸大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：不同意本身是一种威胁面子的言语行为。在面对面交际中，交际者可能会采取某些交际策略来尽量减少其中的面子威胁，从而避免冲突，促进和谐。有关交际者如何在言谈互动中缓和不同意的面子威胁的研究非常之多。然而，在网络上的虚拟交际中，交际者往往有意加剧不同意这一言语行为的面子威胁程度，从而引发冲突。因此，在网络交际中，冒犯性不同意非常普遍。本文通过研究网络多人交互中的冒犯性不同意，试图回答以下三个问题。第一，网络多人交互中实现冒犯性不同意的语言手段有哪些？第二，网络多人交互中的冒犯性不同意体现了哪些不礼貌？第三，为什么不礼貌会普遍体现在网络多人交互下的冒犯性不同意中？本研究采用定性与定量相结合的研究方法。本文语料来自网易新闻匿名评论中的多人会话，冒犯性不同意大量存在于此类多人会话中。根据所选语料，我们对冒犯性不同意进行了界定。其区别性特征为：冒犯者有意冒犯，被冒犯者感受到面子威胁。基于对语料的仔细分析，我们根据其功能将实现冒犯性不同意的语言手段分成六类：詈骂、嘲讽、人身攻击、驳斥、批评和威胁。两种或两种以上的语言手段可能同时出现在一个话轮中。基于不礼貌理论，我们将体现在冒犯性不同意中的各种不礼貌识别出来。研究发现，网络多人交互中的冒犯性不同意体现了五种积极不礼貌，四种消极不礼貌和两种非公开不礼貌。同时，我们还发现，四种不礼貌策略的组合方式普遍出现在冒犯性不同意中。统计结果表明，在网络多人交互语境下的冒犯性不同意中，公开不礼貌出现的频率（91%）远高于非公开不礼貌（9%）。在公开不礼貌策略中，“鄙视、嘲讽、显示高人一等”（23%）、“质问”(22%)、“将他人和负面方面直接联系起来”(14%)和“称呼其他名字”(9%)这四种策略出现的频率最高。将本研究的统计结果和西方学者对英语网络多人会话的不礼貌进行研究而得到的结果对比，我们发现，两者既有相同之处也有不同之处。最后，我们对不礼貌普遍出现在冒犯性不同意中的原因进行了初步的探讨。分析表明，在网络多人交互中，交际者使用冒犯性不同意来实现以下类似目的：激怒对方、发泄负面情绪、争取权利、娱乐读者。而不礼貌的出现能促使冒犯性不同意实现以上类似目的。通过全面阐述多人会话中的冒犯性不同意，本研究能够给网易新闻的读者和评论者提供一些启示。同时，，通过观察冒犯性不同意中的不礼貌的体现情况，本研究为不礼貌研究提供了新的理据。
[Abstract]:Disapproval itself is a face-threatening speech act. In face-to-face communication, communicators may adopt certain communication strategies to minimize face threats and thus avoid conflicts. Promoting harmony. There have been a lot of studies on how communicators mitigate dissenting face threats in verbal interactions. However, in virtual communication on the Internet, communicators tend to deliberately exacerbate the face threat of dissenting speech acts. Therefore, offensive disapproval is very common in online communication. This paper tries to answer the following three questions by studying the offensive disapproval in the interaction of many people on the Internet. What are the language means to achieve offensive disapproval in multiplayer interaction on the Internet? Second, what kind of impoliteness does the offensive disapproval in the multi-person interaction on the Internet reflect? Third, why is impoliteness generally reflected in offensive disapproval under the interaction of many people on the Internet? The present study adopts a qualitative and quantitative approach. The present study is based on the multi-person conversation in NetEase's anonymous news commentary, and disagrees with the fact that a large number of such conversations exist in this kind of multi-person conversation. We define offensive disapproval. The distinguishing features are that the offender intends to offend, the offended person feels the face threat, and based on the careful analysis of the corpus, We classify offensive disapproval into six categories according to its function: swearing, sarcasm, personal attack, refutation, Criticism and threat. Two or more language devices may appear in one turn at the same time. Based on the theory of impoliteness, we will identify the various impoliteness embodied in offensive disapproval. There are five kinds of positive impoliteness, four negative impoliteness and two non-public impoliteness in the online multi-person interaction. At the same time, we also find that, Four combinations of politeness strategies are commonly found in offensive disapproval. The statistical results show that in the context of multi-person interaction on the Internet, offensive disapproval is common. The frequency of public impoliteness is much higher than that of non-public impoliteness. In the strategy of public impoliteness, "despise, ridicule," These four strategies appear most frequently: "direct connection between others and negative aspects" and "addressing other names"). Take the statistical results of this study and western scholars' multiperson conversation on the English network. To compare the results of a study of impoliteness, We find that there are similarities and differences between the two. Finally, we discuss the reasons why impoliteness generally occurs in offensive disapproval. The analysis shows that in the interaction of many people on the Internet, The communicator uses offensive disapproval to achieve the following similar purposes: to provoke the other party, vent negative emotions, strive for rights, and entertain the reader, while the appearance of impoliteness can promote offensive disapproval to achieve the same purpose. By comprehensively expounding the offensive disapproval in multi-person conversation, this study can provide some enlightenment to the readers and commentators of NetEase's news. At the same time, by observing the impoliteness in offensive disapproval, this study can provide some enlightenment to the readers and commenters of NetEase's news. This study provides a new motivation for the study of impoliteness.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H136

【共引文献】