议论文语篇阅读矛盾感受性及其影响因素的在线研究

发布时间：2018-03-02 01:34

本文关键词： 早期感受性延迟感受性语言水平话题熟悉度自定步速逐块阅读任务　出处：《西南大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：语篇阅读信息加工过程研究方面最有影响的理论有建构主义理论、最小假设理论和记忆基础文本加工理论。三大理论在阅读过程推理的类型,文本连贯的表征水平和文本整体连贯获得的机制方面存在分歧。本研究意在探索三个水平的中国英语学习者在矛盾句语篇阅读中会产生早期感受性还是延迟感受性以验证三大理论在连贯性机制方面在二语阅读中的适用性；本研究还检测了语言水平和话题熟悉度对矛盾句语篇阅读是否存在影响。本研究为在线研究,采用自定步速逐块阅读的方法,利用E-prime软件记录三个关键区域的的阅读时间,通过对阅读时间的考察以探测矛盾句语篇阅读的推理机制。实验以高、中、低三组共60名不同英语水平的中国英语学习者为研究对象,实验材料分为实验版本(矛盾版本)和控制版本(一致版本),比较同一水平组两个版本的三个阅读时间以及不同水平组同一版本的三个阅读时间。实验数据利用(SPSS)13.0进行重复测量方差分析,主效应采用事后检验的方法进一步分析,交互作用采用简单效应分析的方法进行进一步分析。采用皮尔逊相关分析检验话题熟悉度和阅读时间是否存在关联。经过数据分析得出以下结论：1.三个水平组都出现了早期感受性现象,验证了建构主义的更新追随假设和记忆基础文本加工理论关于局部连贯中断的即时感受性的假设。2.高水平组读者同时出现了延迟感受性,可能是由于高水平读者具有更大的认知容量,在矛盾阅读结束之后,仍然寻找线索验证之前的推理,出现时间的延迟。3.高、中水平组在关键句后句没有出现时间延迟,验证了更新追随假设；低水平组在关键句后句仍然出现了时间的延迟,验证了记忆基础加工理论。高语言水平读者在阅读中采用积极的策略的阅读方法,不需推理也能产生有意义的文本表征的情况下,读者不采用推理：低水平读者采用的是消极共振的方法进行语篇阅读,不论需不需要推理,读者都自动的连续的进行消极共振整合信息。4.三个水平组读者都产生早期感受性,说明语言水平与矛盾句语篇阅读早期感受性无关。语言水平对矛盾版本三个区域的阅读时间有一定的影响,说明语言水平影响矛盾句语篇阅读的推理过程。5.话题熟悉度对一致版本的三个阅读时间有显著关联,但是只与矛盾版本的目标句后句区域有显著关联。这可能是因为在矛盾版本推理过程中,读者耗费更多的认知资源处理前后文的连贯推理,忽略的背景知识的结合。
[Abstract]:The most influential theories in the study of text reading information processing are constructivism theory, minimum hypothesis theory and memory-based text processing theory. The purpose of this study is to explore whether Chinese EFL learners at three levels produce early receptivity or delayed perception in the reading of contradictory sentences. Sex verifies the applicability of the three theories in second language reading in terms of coherence mechanism; The present study also examines whether language proficiency and topic familiarity affect discourse reading of contradictory sentences. This study is an online study, using the method of self-paced block by block reading, using E-prime software to record the reading time of three key regions, and exploring the inference mechanism of text reading of contradictory sentences by examining the reading time. A total of 60 Chinese EFL learners with different English proficiency were selected as subjects. The experimental materials are divided into experimental version (contradictory version) and control version (consistent version). The three reading times of two versions of the same level group and three reading times of the same version of different level group are compared. The experimental data were analyzed by repeated measurement variance analysis using SPSS 13.0, and the main effect was further analyzed by the method of post-test. The interaction was further analyzed by simple effect analysis. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine whether the familiarity of topic and reading time were related. Through the analysis of the data, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. All the three levels have the phenomenon of early receptivity. It verifies the supposition of constructivist renewal following hypothesis and memory-based text processing theory about the instant receptivity of local coherence interruption. 2. The high level readers have delayed receptivity at the same time. This may be due to the higher cognitive capacity of the high-level readers. After the contradictory reading, they are still looking for clues to verify the reasoning before, the delay of time appears .3.High, and the middle level group has no time delay after the key sentence. It verifies the hypothesis of update following; the low level group still has a delay in time after the key sentence, which verifies the basic processing theory of memory. In the case of meaningful textual representation without inference, the reader does not use inference: the low level reader uses a negative resonance method for text reading, whether or not inference is required. Readers are automatically performing continuous negative resonance integration of information. 4. All three levels of readers have early receptivity. It shows that language proficiency has nothing to do with the early receptivity of contradictory sentence texts. Language proficiency has a certain effect on the reading time of the three regions of contradictory versions. 5. Topic familiarity is significantly related to the three reading times of the consistent version. This may be due to the fact that the reader spends more cognitive resources to deal with the coherent reasoning of the text and neglects the combination of background knowledge.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H0-05

【参考文献】