字母词的修辞观

发布时间：2018-03-19 17:14

本文选题：西文字母词　切入点：现代汉语词典　出处：《当代修辞学》2012年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：最近一段时间,由《现代汉语词典》第6版收录239个字母词引起的争议持续不断,特别是来自语言学界内外的百余位学者于8月29日联名举报这种做法违法并声言字母词危及汉语的纯洁和安全之后,更是引起社会各界对字母词问题的普遍关注,一时之间百家争鸣,意见纷呈。字母词现象错综复杂,人言人殊,看来争论还将持续一个阶段。但是我们发现这次争论固然激烈,学理的深度却显不够。我们觉得应该搁置一些具体环节上的争论,转而着力于字母词本身以及一些相关社会文化问题的学理探究。本期《修辞随谈》邀请到了五位学者就此发表自己的看法。他们视角不同,各有侧重,但都不乏思考的深度。《修辞随谈》致力于成为短兵相接、观点碰撞的学术平台,热诚欢迎您也在字母词的学理层面上参与讨论。若您对此形成了系统的看法,也欢迎写成论文惠赐本刊。
[Abstract]:In recent times, the controversy over the inclusion of 239 letters in the sixth edition of the Modern Chinese Dictionary has continued. In particular, after more than 100 scholars from both inside and outside the linguistic circle jointly reported this practice on August 29th and declared that alphabetic words endanger the purity and safety of Chinese, it has aroused widespread concern about the problem of alphabetical words from all walks of life. For a while, a hundred schools of thought contended and opinions were divided. The phenomenon of letters and words was complicated, and people spoke differently. It seemed that the debate would continue for a while. But we found that this debate was certainly fierce. However, the depth of theory is not enough. We feel that we should put aside some arguments on specific links. Instead of focusing on the alphabet itself and some sociocultural issues, this issue of rhetoric invites five scholars to express their views on this issue. But there is no lack of depth of thinking. Rhetoric is dedicated to becoming an academic platform for the collision of ideas and short arms. You are warmly welcome to participate in the discussion at the theoretical level of alphabetical words. If you have a systematic view of this, You are also welcome to write a paper to this journal.
【作者单位】：复旦大学国际文化交流学院;
【分类号】：H136

【相似文献】