认知视角的现代汉语动词重叠式AABB与ABAB对比研究
发布时间:2018-03-22 09:51
本文选题:动词重叠 切入点:AABB式 出处:《四川外国语大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:动词重叠广泛应用于文学作品和日常交际中,是汉语中一种使用频率很高的构词手段,它引起了许多语言学家的关注。以往的研究大都从语法、语用对其做一个概述性的描写,对其语义特征依旧争论不休。虽然有学者尝试从认知语言学角度探讨其认知理据,但是缺乏权威系统的数据支持,,亟待更深层次的研究和探讨。且动词重叠形式多样,对其单一形式进行探讨鲜见,而从认知视角出发,全面对比探讨AABB式和ABAB式尚属空白。 本文采取定性与定量相结合的研究方法,从权威汉语词典《汉语水平词汇与汉字等级大纲》与《现代汉语词典》第六版收集确认研究对象,借助北京语言大学现代汉语语料库,统计出两类重叠式在《汉语水平词汇与汉字等级大纲》的数据,发现AABB式和ABAB式的构成与词的使用频率密切相关,动词使用频率越高,进入这两种重叠式的可能性越大。紧接着从语义和语用两个层面对比研究两个重叠式特征,结果发现: (1)部分动词进入AABB式后,语义在一定程度上逐渐发生泛化和抽象,处于动词—动词/形容词—形容词的连续统,而ABAB不涉及此过程。 (2)去范畴化过程对动词重叠AABB式语义的产生和变化,以及AABB式句法特征“动词性—动词兼形容词性—形容词”的演变中扮演了重要角色。而语义的解读与人们的认知方式和认知能力密切相关,两种重叠式的语义的差异源自于认知扫描方式的不用,由于动词AABB式在识解过程中采取总体扫描方式,因此强调的是AB作为一个整体的关系,而ABAB式采取的是顺序扫描方式,因此动作A和B的运动过程得以强化。 (3)语用方面,动词AABB式的使用体现了语用经济性,语言对称美和韵律美,而ABAB的使用则体现了在交际的礼貌性。 (4)能否进入这两种重叠式不仅与词的结构密切相关,而且与词的感情色彩相关。 本研究采用认知视角对动词重叠构式AABB和ABAB的对比研究具有重要的理论意义和研究价值,不仅能揭示这两种重叠形式的差异和加深对两种形式的了解,对于汉语语言教学也有所启发,也有助于初学者和汉语学习者把握汉语的本质规律,从而加速语言的习得。
[Abstract]:Verb reduplication is widely used in literary works and daily communication. It is a kind of high frequency word-formation method in Chinese, which has attracted the attention of many linguists. Although some scholars try to explore their cognitive motivation from the perspective of cognitive linguistics, they lack the data support of authoritative system, and need to be further studied and discussed. It is rare to discuss its single form, but from the cognitive perspective, it is still blank to compare and discuss the AABB type and ABAB type. By combining qualitative and quantitative methods, this paper collects and confirms the research objects from the authoritative Chinese Dictionary, outline of Chinese level Vocabulary and Chinese characters, and the sixth edition of Modern Chinese Dictionary. With the help of the Modern Chinese Corpus of Beijing language and language University, the data of two kinds of reduplicated words in the outline of Chinese level Vocabulary and Chinese character Grade are analyzed. It is found that the composition of AABB type and ABAB type is closely related to the frequency of word use, and the higher the frequency of verb use, the higher the frequency of verb use. The more likely it is to enter into these two types of reduplication, the next is a comparative study of the two reduplication features at the semantic and pragmatic levels, and the results show that:. (1) after some verbs enter AABB form, semantics gradually generalize and abstract to a certain extent, and they are in the continuum of verb verb / adjective adjective, but ABAB does not involve this process. (2) the process of de-categorization produces and changes the verb reduplicative AABB semantics. And the AABB syntactic feature "verb, verb and adjective" plays an important role in the evolution, and the interpretation of semantics is closely related to people's cognitive style and cognitive ability. The semantic differences between the two reduplicative patterns are derived from the absence of cognitive scanning. Because the verb AABB takes a general scan in the process of interpretation, it emphasizes the relationship between AB as a whole and ABAB as a whole. Thus the movement process of action A and B is strengthened. In the pragmatic aspect, the use of the verb "AABB" embodies the pragmatic economy, the beauty of language symmetry and the beauty of prosody, while the use of ABAB reflects the politeness of communication. 4) access to these two reduplications is not only closely related to the structure of the word, but also to the emotional color of the word. This study has important theoretical significance and research value in the contrastive study of verb reduplicative constructions AABB and ABAB from a cognitive perspective, which can not only reveal the differences between the two reduplicative forms, but also deepen the understanding of the two forms. It is also helpful for beginners and Chinese learners to grasp the essential laws of Chinese and accelerate language acquisition.
【学位授予单位】:四川外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H146
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张敏;从类型学和认知语法的角度看汉语重叠现象[J];当代语言学;1997年02期
2 杨小锋;试论现代汉语AABB式组合的读音[J];四川师范大学学报(社会科学版);2003年04期
3 刘正光 ,刘润清;Vi+NP的非范畴化解释[J];外语教学与研究;2003年04期
4 华玉明;双音节动词重叠式AABB的状态形容词功能[J];唐都学刊;2003年02期
5 王红梅;形容词、动词AABB重叠式构成的语义条件——以“三言”、“二拍”为例[J];学术交流;2003年07期
6 陈立民;;论动词重叠的语法意义[J];中国语文;2005年02期
7 周永惠;关于动词AABB重叠式[J];四川师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年03期
8 袁毓林;基于隶属度的汉语词类的模糊划分[J];中国社会科学;2005年01期
9 李劲荣;双音节性质形容词可重叠为AABB式的理据[J];上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年02期
10 刘正光,崔刚;非范畴化与“副词+名词”结构[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2005年02期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 李劲荣;现代汉语状态形容词的认知研究[D];上海师范大学;2004年
2 胡孝斌;现代汉语双叠四字格AABB式研究[D];北京语言大学;2007年
本文编号:1648131
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/1648131.html