法律语体中“的”字结构研究

发布时间：2018-04-10 22:49

本文选题：“的”字结构 + 法律语体　；参考：《华中师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：“的”字结构是汉语里出现频率较高的一个结构,在传统语法方面,前人对此结构从多种角度展开了研究,但是他们的研究主要限于单一语体内,研究视野不够开阔。而与单一语体相比,“的”字结构在法律语体中表现出的意义、功能及语义韵分布都比较有特点,并且“的”字结构在法律条文与庭审语言中差异很大,这些都是值得我们深入研究的地方。但是,到目前为止,学界关于法律语体中“的”字结构的研究成果还不是很多。本文拟突破单一语体的限制,将“的”字结构置入法律语体中进行考察、分析,使其研究进一步细化、深化,希望能进一步认识“的”字结构在交叉语体中的表现。另外,本文还将对比法律语体与口语语体、政论语体、科技语体、新闻语体、广告语体中“的”字结构的使用差异,并试图结合各语体功能、特点对其做出合理的解释。本文主要采用分析法、图表法和比较法。在大量语料的基础上,以事实为依据,将定量分析与定性分析有机结合,在扩大研究视野的同时将研究视点细化,宏观与微观相互结合,在多元理论方法的指导下深化、丰富研究内容。本文主要分六个部分进行系统的论述,具体内容如下：第一部分：引言部分。主要介绍前人的研究成果,寻找研究空白与不足之处,引出本文的论题,并指出了本文的研究意义、研究方法以及语料来源。第二部分：法律语体中“的”字结构分布的句法环境及其语义特点。通过对语料库的详细考察、分析,总结出“的”字结构主要分布的句法环境。具体分析了“的”字结构积极、中性、消极语义韵的出现比率,主要表现为消极的语义韵倾向,并总结了其消极语义韵的实现手段。最后还对“的”字结构语义韵分布比率显著的原因作了一些简单的分析。第三部分：法律语体中“的”字结构的基本功能及其隐现机制。以语料库为基础,主要归纳出“的”字结构的五大基本功能,即指称功能、焦点凸显功能、假设功能、定位功能、情感表达功能,并对每一种功能作了较为详细的分析。接着还对“的”字的隐现机制、条件及其动因作了研究。第四部分：法律条文与庭审语言中“的”字结构差异对比。分别统计出法律条文与庭审语言中“的”字结构的出现比例,并对其数据进行分析,试图解释形成差异的原因。第五部分：“的”字结构在不同语体中的分布差异及其解释。主要考察政论语体、广告语体、科技语体、新闻语体、口语语体中“的”字结构的分布差异,并结合各语体的功能、特点做出原因解释。第六部分：结语。主要梳理、总结本文的基本观点和结论,同时指出本文研究的不足之处和今后研究的方向。
[Abstract]:The Chinese word structure is a structure with high frequency in Chinese. In the aspect of traditional grammar, predecessors have studied this structure from various angles, but their research is mainly confined to the body of a single language, so the field of study is not broad enough.Compared with the single style, the meaning, function and semantic rhyme distribution of the word structure in the legal style are more characteristic, and the character structure of the word structure is very different from the trial language in the legal text.These are all worthy of our in-depth study.However, up to now, there are not many researches on the word structure in legal style.This paper intends to break through the limitation of single style, put the "character" structure into the legal style, analyze it, further refine and deepen its research, and hope to further understand the expression of "" character structure in the cross-style.In addition, this paper will compare the usage differences between legal style and spoken style, political style, scientific style, news style and advertising style, and try to make a reasonable explanation on the features of each style.This article mainly uses the analysis method, the chart method and the comparison method.On the basis of a large amount of corpus, based on facts, the quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis are combined organically, the research viewpoint is refined while the research field is expanded, and the macro and micro aspects are combined together, which is deepened under the guidance of the multivariate theoretical method.Enrich the research content.This paper is mainly divided into six parts for a systematic discussion, the specific content is as follows:The first part: introduction.This paper mainly introduces the previous research achievements, seeks for the research blank and deficiency, leads to the topic of this paper, and points out the research significance, research methods and the source of the corpus.The second part: the syntactic environment and semantic characteristics of the word structure distribution in the legal style.Through the detailed investigation and analysis of the corpus, this paper summarizes the syntactic environment in which the word structure is mainly distributed.This paper analyzes the occurrence rate of positive, neutral and negative semantic prosody in the word structure, mainly shows the negative semantic prosody tendency, and summarizes the means to realize the negative semantic rhyme.Finally, some simple analysis is made on the reason why the semantic rhyme distribution ratio of word structure is significant.The third part: the basic function and hidden mechanism of the word structure in the legal style.On the basis of corpus, this paper summarizes five basic functions of the word structure, that is, referential function, focus prominent function, hypothetical function, location function, emotion expression function, and makes a detailed analysis of each function.Then, the mechanism, condition and motivation of the word "di" are studied.The fourth part: the contrast between the legal provisions and the word structure in the language of trial.The proportion of the word structure in the legal text and the trial language is calculated, and the data are analyzed in order to explain the reason of the difference.The fifth part: the distribution and explanation of the word structure in different languages.This paper mainly studies the distribution difference of "word" structure in political criticism style, advertising style, science and technology style, news style and spoken language style, and explains the reasons combined with the functions and characteristics of each style.Part VI: conclusion.This paper summarizes the basic viewpoints and conclusions of this paper, and points out the shortcomings of this study and the direction of future research.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】