《续一切经音义》所引《广雅》研究

发布时间：2018-04-25 05:18

本文选题：《续一切经音义》 + 《广雅》　；参考：《广西大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文选出《续一切经音义》所引《广雅》进行研究和探讨,主要是将《续一切经音义》所引《广雅》与四库全书本《广雅》、清代王念孙《广雅疏证》、现代《广雅诂林》进行较为系统的比较分析,找出现存《广雅》、《广雅疏证》、《广雅诂林》存在的疏漏之处,并分析其原因,从而达到对现存《广雅》、《广雅疏证》和《广雅诂林》适当的校补作用。这项工作对《广雅》的整理与研究和深入反映《续一切经音义》的文献价值有着非常重要的意义。全文共分四个部分和附录。第一部分为绪论部分,概要地介绍了希麟的生平、《续一切经音义》的内容、版本和源流,并对《广雅》、《广雅疏证》、《广雅诂林》进行了简要的概述,陈述了《续一切经音义》所引《广雅》的研究现状和研究意义。第二部分把《续一切经音义》所引《广雅》材料与现存四库全书本《广雅》内容进行比较研究,重点分析两者在内容上存在差异的地方。第三部分把《续一切经音义》所引《广雅》材料与《广雅疏证》、《广雅诂林》进行比较研究,阐明《广雅疏证》、《广雅诂林》的得失之处,体现《续一切经音义》所引《广雅》材料的文献价值。第四部分为结语,通过对比分析,归纳出《续一切经音义》所引《广雅》材料的三个特点,并对本文的不足之处进行了阐述。
[Abstract]:In this paper, we choose "Guangya", which is cited in "all the Scriptures and meanings", to study and discuss. The comparison and analysis are mainly made between "Guangya" and Siku's book "Guangya", Wang Niansun's "Guang Ya Shu" in Qing Dynasty, and modern "Guangya Gelin". To find out the omissions of the extant "Guangya", "Guangya thinning", "Guangya Exegetical Forest", and to analyze the reasons, so as to achieve the appropriate function of correction and supplement to the extant "Guangya", "Guangya sparse Identification" and "Guangya Exegetical Forest". This work is of great significance to the collation and study of Guangya and the deep reflection of the literature value of all the Scriptures and meanings. The full text is divided into four parts and appendices. The first part is the introduction, which briefly introduces the life of Xi Lin, the content, the edition and the origin of all the Scriptures, and gives a brief overview of Guangya, Guangya and Guang Ya Lin. The present situation and significance of the research on Guangya cited in all the Scriptures are stated in this paper. The second part makes a comparative study of the contents of "Guangya", which is quoted by "all the classics", and the contents of the extant Siku Guanshu, focusing on the analysis of the differences between the two in terms of content. The third part compares "Guangya" with "Guangya" and "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", and "Guangya". To embody the literature value of the materials cited in all the classics and meanings. The fourth part is the conclusion. Through comparative analysis, the author concludes the three characteristics of the material cited in the "Guangya", and expounds the deficiency of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H131

【参考文献】