论趋向补语与宾语的位置问题

发布时间：2018-04-27 22:56

本文选题：趋向补语 + 宾语　；参考：《西北师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：谓语动词后往往后接宾语,如果同时存在趋向动词作补语,必然产生一个问题。即：谓语动词、宾语、趋向补语三者之间的位置关系究竟是怎样的。理论上有三种结构：A.“动+趋+宾”,B.“动+宾+趋”,C.“动+趋+宾+趋”。究竟,这三种情况是可以随意使用,还是有所限制?如果有限制什么样的限制?为什么会有这样的限制?本文在前人研究的基础上,在详细罗列、描写不同情况下三种格式各具特点的使用情况的同时。基于认知语言学时间相似性原则、顺序原则的理论,并同时广泛使用对比分析的方法。分别对三类趋向动词作补语与宾语共现的句子分三类十二种情况进行分析,主要目的在于：在描写语言事实的基础上,尽可能说明产生这种事实的原因。材料选择方面基本引述现成论文的例句,个别句子出于说明需要属于自造句,但符合汉语习惯。本文的研究结果也许会对认知型的对外汉语教学产生一些有益影响。
[Abstract]:Predicate verbs are often followed by objects. If there are directional verbs as complements at the same time, a problem will inevitably arise. Namely: predicate verb, object, trend complement between the position of the relationship between what is. Theoretically, there are three structures: A. "moving toward the object". C. Move toward object. Are these three cases optional or restricted? If there's a limit, what kind of restriction? Why are there such restrictions? On the basis of previous studies, this paper describes the use of the three formats in different cases in detail. Based on the principle of temporal similarity and the principle of sequence in cognitive linguistics, the method of comparative analysis is widely used at the same time. This paper analyzes the three kinds of sentences which are coexisting with the object and complement of the three kinds of directional verbs. The main purpose of this paper is to explain the reasons for the fact on the basis of describing the facts of the language. In terms of material selection, examples from ready-made papers are basically quoted. Some sentences are self-made sentences for the sake of explanation, but accord with the Chinese custom. The results of this study may have some beneficial effects on cognitive Chinese teaching as a foreign language.
【学位授予单位】：西北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H195.3

【参考文献】