“说不得”的词汇化及相关问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-09 12:04

本文选题：“说不得” + 词汇化　；参考：《浙江师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文以“说不得”的历史发展脉络为主线,通过对“说不得”不同历史时期使用情况的考察,勾勒出“说不得”词汇化的演变脉络,研究其词汇化动因与机制,并以“说不得”的隐退现象为切入点,探索现代汉语中“说不得”这类隐退词汇的亚规范机制。本文共有六章：第一章是绪论,就研究意义与研究目的进行阐述,概述现阶段的研究概况以及本文研究的理论基础,并对研究方法和语料来源予以介绍。第二章对五四以前各阶段的文献语料作统计分析,考察两汉魏晋、唐五代时期、两宋时期、元明时期、清及民国时期“说不得”的使用情况,关注每一阶段“说不得”作为不同语法单位类型时的句法、语义及语用功能,详细描写每一阶段的演变进程,勾勒出“说不得”的词汇化演变脉络。第三章运用词汇化理论、话语标记理论、“主观化”、“重新分析”等语言学重要理论,对“说不得”词汇化发展的动因和机制进行探究。第四章对现代汉语中“说不得”的分布及语用功能进行分析,对词典中以及现代汉语语料库中的“说不得”进行统计与考察,并对“说不得”在“仿古袭旧”类文学作品中的使用予以关注。然后从“说不得”的隐退分析入手,对于现代汉语中词汇隐退及亚规范现象进行理论探讨,以期能够对“说不得”的隐退路径以及相关问题做出合理的描写和解释,并对其亚规范语言现象的社会语言学意义进行深入挖掘。第五章是结论,对全文进行概述：回顾“说不得”词汇化的历程；归纳其词汇化的动因与机制：“不”的虚化、“得”的语法化、句法环境影响,以及重新分析、主观化及回溯推理机制；最后对以“说不得”为代表的隐退词汇及亚规范机制概括阐述。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the historical development of "saying No" as the main line, through the investigation of the use of "said No" in different historical periods, outlines the evolution of "said No" lexicalization, and studies its causes and mechanisms of lexicalization. From the point of view of the phenomenon of "saying no", this paper explores the substandard mechanism of "saying no" in modern Chinese. There are six chapters in this paper: The first chapter is the introduction, which describes the significance and purpose of the research, summarizes the current research situation and the theoretical basis of this study, and introduces the research methods and the source of the corpus. The second chapter makes a statistical analysis of the literature data before the May 4th Movement, and investigates the use of "saying No" in the periods of Wei, Jin, Tang and five dynasties, two Song dynasties, Yuan and Ming dynasties, the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China in the Han Dynasty and the Jin Dynasty, the Tang Dynasty and the five dynasties. This paper focuses on the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic functions of "saying no" as different grammatical unit types in each stage, describes the evolution process of each stage in detail, and outlines the lexicalization evolution of "saying no". Chapter three explores the motivation and mechanism of lexicalization, discourse marker, subjectivization and reanalysis. The fourth chapter analyzes the distribution and pragmatic function of "saying no" in modern Chinese, and makes statistics and investigation on "saying no" in dictionaries and in modern Chinese corpus. And pay attention to the use of "saying No" in the literary works of "imitating antiquity and imitating the old". Then starting with the retreat analysis of "saying No", this paper makes a theoretical discussion on the phenomenon of lexical retreat and substandard in modern Chinese, in order to make a reasonable description and explanation of the retreat path and related problems of "saying No". And the sociolinguistic significance of its sub-normative language phenomenon is deeply explored. Chapter five is the conclusion, which summarizes the whole text: reviewing the process of lexicalization, summarizing the causes and mechanisms of lexicalization, the grammaticalization of "no", the grammaticalization of "gain", the influence of syntactic environment, and the reanalysis. The mechanism of subjective and retroactive reasoning is summarized, and the reclusive lexical and subnormative mechanism represented by "saying No" is discussed in the end.
【学位授予单位】：浙江师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】