超越区别与描写之争:“的”的认知入场作用

发布时间：2018-05-10 23:33

本文选题：“的” + 区别性　；参考：《世界汉语教学》2012年02期

【摘要】：区别说称"的"从"认知域中确立出成员";而描写说则认为"的"在语义平面是描写性的,在语境中派生出区别及指称功能。区别说忽视区别和描写的联系,描写说承认二者有联系却仍把二者对立。在词汇意义上使用术语区别和描写,不利于说清"的"的功能。引入认知语法的入场理论可以发现,区别和描写都是为了入场。"描写性"可以在认知语用层面上重新定义。"的"使用描写入场策略达成明确指称的目的。"的"前成分本身不一定需要有很强的词汇描写性,甚至不需要有描写性,它们加上"的"以后就可以对中心语的特征做出描写,明确指称对象,以达到型概念在认知场景中实例化亦即认知入场的目的。此说可以解答区别和描写之争中的悬疑。
[Abstract]:The "differentiation theory" establishes members from the "cognitive domain", while the descriptive theory holds that "the" is descriptive on the semantic level, and derives the difference and referential functions in the context. The theory of distinction ignores the connection between distinction and description, which admits that the two are related but still opposites them. The use of terminology in the lexical sense of distinction and description is not conducive to the function of "clear talk". Introduction of the admission theory of cognitive grammar can be found that the distinction and description are for admission. " Descriptive "can be redefined at the cognitive pragmatic level." "the use of descriptive admission strategies to achieve a clearly stated purpose." It is not necessary to have very strong lexical description, or even descriptive, in the "pre-elements", and they can describe the characteristics of the head language after adding "the", and clearly refer to the object. The purpose of cognitive admission is to instantiate the concept of type in the cognitive scene. This theory can answer the suspense in the dispute of distinction and description.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院语言研究所;
【基金】：中国社会科学院青年科研启动基金项目“‘的’的词类地位的类型学研究”资助
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】