线状量词“根、支、枝、条”的研究

发布时间：2018-05-15 12:50

本文选题：线状量词 + 认知基础　；参考：《上海师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文线状量词“根、支、枝、条”的研究从收集和整理这四个量词的历时语料入手，从语料中分别整理出这与这四个量词搭配的名词，，从中梳理这四个量词历时演变的发展脉络；一方面，通过这四个量词的发展脉络分别归纳出这四个量词在各个时代的认知基础,另一方面，通过对这四个量词的历时考察解决了我们共时中关于这四个量词用法上的种种问题，比如一名多量的现象、量词的大量混用、对线状名词称量的不对称等等；并进一步解释了这些现象形成的原因。本文内容共分六章。第一章是绪论部分。主要介绍了本文的选题缘由，题目的定位、文章价值以及相关的文献综述。第二章是对线状量词“根、支、枝、条”的共时描写。主要对这四个量词从共时方面进行描写和分析，从范畴化角度入手分析出这四个量词在共时平面上的典型特征，并对其相关的语义特征进行分析。然后再将四个量词进行对比，将四个量词做一些共时平面上的区分，发现一些共时平面上解决不了的问题。第三章是对四个量词历时演变的描写。主要从大量的语料事实入手，分别对这四个量词做详细的历时演变考察，作为第四章的基础。第四章是本文的重点。主要是对第三章的语料事实进行分析，分别归纳出四个量词的历时演变轨迹，将各个时期的认知基础进行比较最后得出一张量词认知基础的演变图，并对这整个历时演变中所涉及到的来源、发展、调整等等原因进行进一步分析，用以解决在第二章中共时上解决不了的问题。第五章是将这四个量词在以上结论的指导下做的一个再对比。总结了这四个量词在使用上的差异以及成因。第六章结语。对全文进行了一个总结。
[Abstract]:The research of the linear classifier "root, branch, branch and strip" begins with the collection and arrangement of the diachronic corpus of the four classifiers, and the nouns which are matched with the four classifiers are respectively sorted out from the corpus. On the one hand, through the development of the four classifiers, the cognitive basis of the four classifiers in each era is summed up, on the other hand, Through the diachronic investigation of these four classifiers, we solve the problems in the usage of these four classifiers in the synchronic, such as the phenomenon of a large number of quantifiers, the mass mixing of quantifiers, the asymmetry of weighing linear nouns, and so on; The reasons for the formation of these phenomena are further explained. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. This paper mainly introduces the reason of the topic, the location of the topic, the value of the article and related literature review. The second chapter is the synchronic description of the linear quantifier "root, branch, branch and strip". This paper mainly describes and analyzes the four classifiers from the synchronic aspect, analyzes the typical features of the four classifiers in the synchronic plane from the perspective of categorization, and analyzes their relevant semantic features. Then the four quantifiers are contrasted, and the four classifiers are distinguished from each other on the synchronic plane, and some problems that can not be solved in the synchronic plane are found. The third chapter describes the diachronic evolution of the four classifiers. Starting from a large number of corpus facts, the four quantifiers are investigated in detail as the basis of chapter four. The fourth chapter is the focus of this paper. It mainly analyzes the facts of the corpus in chapter 3, and summarizes the diachronic evolution of the four classifiers, compares the cognitive basis of each period, and finally obtains a map of the evolution of the cognitive basis of the classifier. And the causes of the whole diachronic evolution, such as the source, development, adjustment and so on, are further analyzed to solve the problems that cannot be solved in the second chapter. The fifth chapter is a comparison of the four quantifiers under the guidance of the above conclusions. The differences in the use of these four classifiers and their causes are summarized. Chapter VI conclusion. A summary of the full text is given.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H14

【参考文献】