唐五代史料笔记训诂研究
本文选题:唐五代史料笔记 + 训诂内容 ; 参考:《山东师范大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:笔记是中国古代文学中较为常见的一种文学体裁。作为一种文体,笔记最早是与辞赋等韵文相对而言的。笔记这种体裁萌芽于汉代,如班固的《白虎通义》、应劭的《风俗通义》等。但是“笔记”这一名称,起于六朝时。中国古代的笔记,在魏晋之后得到了迅速的发展。唐五代是笔记发展的重要阶段,这一时期各种类型的笔记大量出现,据不完全统计应该在二百部以上。唐五代笔记在中国古代笔记史上具有重要的意义,尤其是史料笔记,不仅具有极高的史料价值,而且对文学、语言学、社会学等的研究也有极高的价值。 本文在对唐五代二十五部史料笔记的训诂条目进行整理的基础上,详细分析了其中的训诂内容及训诂方法。另外,通过对唐五代史料笔记中的训诂资料与《汉语大词典》进行比对后,进一步补正了《汉语大词典》的相关词条。 全文共分为五部分: 绪论部分介绍了笔记与笔记训诂的内涵及特点,总结了唐五代史料笔记的时代背景和研究价值,并在广泛搜集材料的基础上分析了唐五代史料笔记的研究现状。 第一章“唐五代史料笔记训诂内容”,主要从考释词语、考辨读音、考释文字、串讲文意、说明修辞、探求词语出处等六个方面讨论了唐五代史料笔记中涉及到的训诂内容。 第二章“唐五代史料笔记的训诂方法”,主要从求义方法和释义方法两个角度分析了唐五代史料笔记中涉及到的训诂方法。 第三章“唐五代史料笔记对《汉语大词典》的补正”论述了唐五代史料笔记对辞书编纂的价值。我们把唐五代史料笔记中的训诂内容与《汉语大词典》的释词进行了比对,,重点讨论了《汉语大词典》中存在的词条失收、义项缺失、引证嫌迟、书证不足等问题,其中词条失收64条,义项缺失7条,引证嫌迟12条,书证不足5条。 结语部分进一步总结全文,再一次强调了唐五代史料笔记的价值所在。 笔记是一种重要的文学形式,而唐五代史料笔记对语言学的研究与发展起着重要作用,希望通过本文的研究,使学术界注意到唐五代史料笔记对语言学的重要价值,从而对其进行更为深入的研究,使唐五代史料笔记的学术价值得到充分的挖掘。
[Abstract]:Notes are a common literary genre in ancient Chinese literature. As a style of writing, notes are originally relative to verse such as Fu. Note-taking originated in the Han Dynasty, such as Ban Gu's "Bai Hu Tong Yi", venerable "Custom Tong Yi" and so on. But the name Notebook began in the six dynasties. The notes of ancient China developed rapidly after the Wei and Jin dynasties. Tang and five dynasties is an important stage in the development of notes. During this period, various types of notes appeared in large numbers, and according to incomplete statistics, they should be more than 200. The notes of Tang and five dynasties are of great significance in the history of Chinese ancient notes, especially the notes of historical materials, which are of great value not only in the study of literature, linguistics and sociology, but also in the study of literature, linguistics and sociology. On the basis of sorting out the exegesis items of 25 historical data notes in the Tang and five dynasties, this paper analyzes in detail the exegetical contents and exegetical methods. In addition, by comparing the exegetical materials in the historical notes of Tang and five dynasties with the Chinese Dictionary, the relevant entries of the Chinese Dictionary are further corrected. The full text is divided into five parts: The introduction part introduces the connotation and characteristics of notes and notes exegesis, summarizes the historical background and research value of historical notes of Tang and five dynasties, and analyzes the current research situation of historical notes of Tang and five dynasties on the basis of extensive collection of materials. The first chapter, "the content of the historical materials notes of the Tang and five dynasties", mainly discusses the exegesis contents involved in the notes of the historical materials of the Tang and five dynasties from six aspects of textual research, textual interpretation, literary meaning, rhetoric explanation, and exploration of the source of the words and phrases in the notes of historical materials of the Tang and five dynasties. The second chapter, "Exegetical methods of the historical notes of the Tang and five dynasties", mainly analyzes the exegesis methods involved in the notes of historical materials of the Tang and five dynasties from two angles: the method of seeking meaning and the method of interpretation. The third chapter discusses the value of the historical notes of Tang and five dynasties to the compilation of dictionaries. We compare the exegesis in the historical notes of the Tang and the five dynasties with the interpretation of the Chinese Dictionary, and focus on the problems of missing entries, missing meanings, late citations and insufficient documentary evidence in the Great Chinese Dictionary. Among them, 64 entries were lost, 7 were missing, 12 were late, and less than 5 were documentary evidence. The conclusion part further summarizes the full text, and emphasizes once again the value of the historical notes of the Tang and five dynasties. Notes are an important form of literature, and the notes of historical materials of Tang and five dynasties play an important role in the research and development of linguistics. It is hoped that through the study of this paper, the academic circles will notice the important value of historical notes of Tang and five dynasties to linguistics. Therefore, the academic value of historical notes of Tang and five dynasties can be fully excavated.
【学位授予单位】:山东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H131;H164
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张泰;沙爱敏;;从训诂的角度看《聊斋志异》词语的训释[J];蒲松龄研究;2006年04期
2 王其和;;《右台仙馆笔记》之汉语史资料[J];蒲松龄研究;2010年02期
3 高兴;古人笔记与《汉语大词典》[J];安徽师大学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年04期
4 朱傲蕾;;试论唐代笔记小说中亲属称谓语的外化[J];长春理工大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
5 邓红梅;;唐宋笔记中民间隐语的特点[J];成都大学学报(社会科学版);2006年02期
6 郭作飞;周红苓;;唐宋笔记疑难语词考释[J];古汉语研究;2009年04期
7 吴庆峰;《阅微草堂笔记》之汉语史资料[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2001年06期
8 范崇高;唐代笔记小说校语散议[J];古籍整理研究学刊;1996年06期
9 冯玉涛;郭常娟;;关于训诂的体式、体例、条例、方法和方式——目前训诂学著作中相关问题之比较分析[J];华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年01期
10 王凤产;;《本草纲目》中的植物名称训诂及其影响[J];中国科技术语;2011年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 蔡静波;唐五代笔记小说研究[D];陕西师范大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 段英倩;清代史料笔记训诂研究[D];山东师范大学;2012年
2 李娟红;宋代笔记中训诂学问题研究[D];四川大学;2005年
3 郭宁;唐代笔记小说副词研究[D];河北师范大学;2009年
本文编号:1901623
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/1901623.html