中韩低频度副词的对比研究

发布时间：2018-05-24 05:21

本文选题：低频度副词 + 语义　；参考：《上海外国语大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：低频度副词是汉韩两种语言中共同存在且经常使用的一种词类。中国语言学界对频度副词进行了热烈的讨论,但韩国语学界多数学者仍把频度副词当作时间副词的一个次类来研究。目前为止对频度副词的研究还主要集中在本体层面和宏观层面,对频度副词某一下位分类的对比研究还处于起步阶段。鉴于此,本文把频度副词从时间副词中独立出来,并主要对比研究其下位分类的一种——低频度副词,从对比语言学的角度出发,采用共时描写的方法,从语义、句法、语用三个方面对比分析了中韩低频度副词,并双向归纳了它们的对应形式和对应条件,力求在客观描写的基础上,找出中韩低频度副词的异同及原因。语义方面,提出了中韩低频度副词分为一般语义特征和特殊语义特征的观点,并逐词分析归纳,总结出了其对应形式和对应条件。句法方面,主要从句法分布、共现关系、句法机能等三个方面对比分析了中韩低频度副词,发现了中韩低频度副词位于句首表强调时的表现差异和与副词下位分类共现时在排列性方面的差异,同时指出了两种语言的低频度副词在句法机能方面的共同点和不同点。语用方面,主要从语用机能、句型分布和使用频度三方面来考察中韩低频度副词的共性和个性。文章在对比分析中韩低频度副词的共同点和不同点的同时,对语言内部的几个近义词研究对象间也做出了对比,对两语言的本体研究也具有一定的价值。希望本研究成果为中韩频度副词的研究贡献一份薄力,同时,能给国内学生的韩国语学习及韩国人的汉语学习提供一定的帮助。
[Abstract]:Low-frequency adverbs are common parts of speech in both Chinese and Korean languages. Chinese linguists have made a heated discussion on frequency adverbs, but most Korean scholars still study frequency adverbs as a subclass of time adverbs. Up to now, the research on frequency adverbs is mainly focused on the ontology level and macro level, and the comparative study on the classification of frequency adverbs is still in its infancy. In view of this, frequency adverbs are separated from temporal adverbs, and a kind of low-frequency adverbs which are classified in their inferior position are compared and studied. From the perspective of contrastive linguistics, synchronic description is used to analyze the semantic and syntactic features of adverbs. This paper makes a comparative analysis of low-frequency adverbs in China and Korea from three aspects of pragmatics and concludes their corresponding forms and corresponding conditions in both directions in order to find out the similarities and differences of low-frequency adverbs between China and Korea and their causes on the basis of objective description. In terms of semantics, this paper puts forward the viewpoint that Chinese and Korean low-frequency adverbs can be divided into general semantic features and special semantic features. The corresponding forms and corresponding conditions are summed up by word analysis and induction. Syntactic aspects, mainly from the syntactic distribution, co-occurrence relationship, syntactic function and other three aspects of comparative analysis of low-frequency adverbs between China and South Korea. This paper finds out the differences in the performance of Chinese and Korean low-frequency adverbs when they are at the beginning of sentences and the differences in arrangement with adverbs' lower classification. At the same time, it points out the common points and differences in syntactic functions of low-frequency adverbs in the two languages. In pragmatic aspect, the commonness and individuality of Chinese and Korean low frequency adverbs are investigated from three aspects: pragmatic function, sentence pattern distribution and frequency of use. In this paper, the similarities and differences between Chinese and Korean low-frequency adverbs are analyzed, and the objects of several synonyms in the language are also compared, which is of value to the ontology study of the two languages. It is hoped that this study will contribute a little to the study of Chinese and Korean frequency adverbs, and at the same time, it will be helpful to the study of Korean and Korean.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146;H55

【参考文献】