鼻流量测试新语句材料的效度检验及鼻流量值的性别差异分析

发布时间：2018-05-27 01:12

  本文选题：鼻流量测试 + 语句材料　； 参考：《听力学及言语疾病杂志》2014年05期

【摘要】：目的检验鼻流量测试新语句材料的测试效度,并分析其测试结果的性别差异。方法应用本研究编制的鼻流量测试新语句材料和目前中国主要使用的鼻流量测试原语句材料,用NasalView汶鼻流量测试仪测试102例年龄18~23岁的北京在校大学生的鼻流量值,男女各半,均在北京出生且居住18年以上,均以北京话为交流语言,比较其结果和男女差异。结果 1新材料鼻腔句、口腔句和口鼻腔句测试的平均鼻流量值分别为56.58%±3.43%、33.86%±5.24%和49.49%±4.13%,原材料的测试结果分别为54.31%±4.43%、35.64%±5.90%和47.12%±4.96%,差异均有显著统计学意义,且女生较男生高(均为P0.01);2鼻流量测试新材料与原材料测试结果之间有相关关系,鼻腔句r=.899(P0.01),口腔句r=0.850(P0.01),口鼻腔句r=0.851 0(P0.01);3新材料测试结果的标准误较原材料更小,差异有极显著统计学意义(P0.01)。结论鼻流量测试新语句材料具有较好的测试效度,与原语句材料之间存在较高的相关关系,利用新材料进行鼻流量测试时,其结果会更准确,可信度更高;正常青年女性鼻流量值较男性高。
[Abstract]:Objective to test the validity of nasal flow test materials and analyze the gender differences in the results. Methods using the new sentence material of nasal flow test compiled in this study and the original sentence material of nasal flow test mainly used in China at present, the nasal flow value of 102 college students aged 1823 years in Beijing was measured by NasalView nasal flow tester, which was half male and half male. Both were born in Beijing and lived in Beijing for more than 18 years. Results (1) the mean nasal flow value of the new material was 56.58% 卤3.43 卤33.86% 卤5.24% and 49.49% 卤4.13%, respectively. The test results of raw materials were 54.31% 卤4.435.64% 卤5.90% and 47.12% 卤4.96%, respectively. Moreover, girls were higher than boys (P 0.01). There was a correlation between the new material of nasal flow test and the result of raw material test. The standard error of the new material was lower than that of raw material, and the standard error of the new material was lower than that of the raw material. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.01). Conclusion the new sentence material for nasal flow test has better test validity and has a higher correlation with the original sentence material. When the new material is used for nasal flow test, the results will be more accurate and reliable. The nasal flow value of normal young women was higher than that of men.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学言语听觉科学教育部重点实验室;华东师范大学言语听觉康复科学系;韩国LUTHER大学言语语言病理学系;北京联合大学特殊教育学院;
【基金】：上海市哲学社会科学项目(2012JG003-BYY963)
【分类号】：H018.4
，

本文编号：1939739