汉语语境下婆媳冲突性话语的语用研究

发布时间：2018-06-13 05:29

本文选题：婆媳冲突 + 反对策略　；参考：《重庆大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：冲突性话语作为一种普遍却又复杂的语言现象，充斥着我们生活的每个角落。不少学者对此也进行了一系列的研究，且多以“争吵、争论、争辩、反对、异议”等概念来描述此类语言现象。尽管对其表述不一，“对抗性”，作为冲突话语的根本属性，一直以来得到了众多学者的普遍认同。考虑到冲突话语与百姓生活密切相关，不少专家学者也尝试对其进行多角度研究。其中，基于汉语语境下对婆媳冲突话语进行的研究则相对较少，尤其是从语用学角度对其进行系统分析的文献更为匮乏。因此，本研究将立足于汉语语境下的婆媳冲突，，以话语分析和面子保全理论为指导，对所选取的两部婆媳体裁类电视剧《麻辣婆媳》和《双面胶》中出现的婆媳冲突话语进行定性、定量分析。通过定性研究，婆媳双方在冲突过程中所采用的反对策略将得以明确。同时，基于对其面子威胁程度的考量，我们将这些策略分为四大类。在此基础上，通过定量比较，本研究将就婆媳双方在具体策略选择中呈现出的差异进行诠释分析。通过系统研究，我们发现：首先，婆媳双方在冲突中使用的反对策略可以归纳为缓和策略、折中策略、强硬策略和攻击策略等四个大类。这其中又包含着十七种具体的使用策略，例如“部分同意”、“直接拒绝”、“强烈同意”、“詈骂语”等。另外，通过比较婆媳双方在策略使用中的差异，我们发现这些差异的造成并不只是交际双方基于对面子因素（如“权利”、“语用距离”、“强加程度”）的考虑。同时，它也受到诸如“文化传统”、“个体性格”、“情感”等语境因素的制约。总之，本研究将弥补婆媳冲突话语在语用研究方面的不足，致力于探索婆媳双方在冲突中策略选择的差异以及造成这些差异的制约机制。通过本研究，读者将对婆媳冲突有更加深刻的认识和了解，这对于避免家庭矛盾、建设和谐社会是极为有益的。
[Abstract]:As a universal and complex language phenomenon, conflict discourse is full of every corner of our life. Many scholars have also carried out a series of studies on this, and used the concepts of "quarrelling, arguing, opposing, disagreeing" to describe this kind of linguistic phenomenon. Although its expression is different, "adversarial", as the basic attribute of conflict discourse, has been generally accepted by many scholars. Considering that conflict discourse is closely related to people's life, many experts and scholars also try to study it from different angles. Among them, there are relatively few researches on the conflict discourse between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in Chinese context, especially the literature of systematic analysis from the perspective of pragmatics. Therefore, this study will be based on the conflict between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in Chinese context, guided by discourse analysis and face saving theory. The qualitative and quantitative analysis of conflict discourse between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the two TV dramas "spicy mother-in-law and daughter-in-law" and "double-sided glue" were carried out. Through qualitative research, the opposing strategies adopted by mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the conflict process will be clarified. At the same time, based on the level of face threat, we divide these strategies into four categories. On this basis, through quantitative comparison, this study will analyze the differences between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the choice of specific strategies. Through systematic research we find that: first of all the opposition strategies used by mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the conflict can be divided into four categories: mitigation strategy compromise strategy tough strategy and attack strategy. There are 17 specific strategies, such as "partial consent", "direct refusal", "strong consent", "swear language" and so on. In addition, by comparing the differences in the use of strategies between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, we find that these differences are caused not only by the consideration of face factors (such as "right", "pragmatic distance", "degree of imposition") on the part of communicative parties. At the same time, it is restricted by such contextual factors as cultural tradition, individual character and emotion. In a word, this study will make up for the lack of pragmatic research on conflict discourse between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, and try to explore the differences in the choice of strategies between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the conflict and the restrictive mechanisms that lead to these differences. Through this study, readers will have a deeper understanding of the conflict between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, which is extremely helpful to avoid family conflicts and build a harmonious society.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】