高本汉《中国音韵学研究》接受史研究
发布时间：2018-07-18 11:44
【摘要】：从接受史角度看,以往的接受史研究在文学、艺术、哲学各个领域均有所建树,而独缺语言学接受史。从音韵学史角度看,以往的汉语音韵学史研究主要集中在清代的古音学史的研究之上,而对中国现代音韵学产生重要影响的高本汉《中国音韵学研究》却鲜有论述。高本汉《中国音韵学研究》标志着中国现代音韵学的开端,具有划时代的意义。二十世纪的汉语音韵学史从某种层面说可以认为是高本汉《中国音韵学研究》接受史。本文即从接受史角度出发,在音韵学史的框架之下对高本汉《中国音韵学研究》进行细致的分析和讨论,从而探讨高本汉这位“科学巨人”究竟给汉语音韵学带来了何种变革、何种影响。 本文共6章,分别从符号、材料、观点、方法、方言研究讨论高本汉《中国音韵学研究》的接受史,探讨高本汉《中国音韵学研究》对汉语音韵学乃至整个汉语研究带来的影响。 第一章、讨论了高本汉对标示汉语音标符号及音标符号用法的贡献。 第二章、讨论了高本汉对韵图与《切韵》之间关系的看法、对对音材料运用的看法、对近代反切材料性质的看法,以及这些看法对后世的影响。 第三章、讨论了高本汉对《切韵》音系的构拟,以及后世学者对高本汉构拟的接受。由于学术观点和目的的不同,高本汉为《切韵》构拟了更加细致的声母和韵母系统,后世学者多从音位学角度对高本汉的构拟进行修订,但这不能视为对高本汉的否定。如果没有高本汉的开创工作,从音位学角度分析《切韵》音系是不可能进行的。 第四章、讨论了高本汉在《中国音韵学研究》中运用的“非典型”历史比较法,分析了其与19世纪典型历史比较法之间的差异,指出高本汉运用的“非典型”历史比较法是中国学者接受历史比较法的中介。后世有不少学者重新采用19世纪典型历史比较法进行汉语方言的比较研究,但并未获得广泛认同。 第五章、讨论了高本汉对汉语方言调查和研究的贡献。高本汉在《中国音韵学研究》中已经指出山西方言与周围的官话方言不同,他认为文水、兴县、太谷、归化和凤台是很古怪很重要的方言。这是早期学者关注晋方言独特性的重要研究成果。此外高本汉对兰银官话、中原官话、江淮官话、吴方言、粤方言、闽方言的调查和研究都展示了100年前这些方言的典型特征和细致的语音特征。 第六章、对前五章的分析和讨论进行了总结,同时从学术史的角度下提出应该在“《切韵》与现代方言”、“音值构拟和音位构拟”以及“要素和结构”的关系三个方面重新认识高本汉。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the history of reception, the past studies of the history of acceptance have made achievements in literature, art and philosophy, but lack of the history of linguistic acceptance. From the perspective of the history of phonology, the previous researches on the history of Chinese phonology are mainly focused on the study of the ancient phonological history of the Qing Dynasty, but the study of Chinese phonology, which has an important impact on modern Chinese phonology, is seldom discussed. Gao Benhan's study of Chinese phonology marks the beginning of modern Chinese phonology and has epoch-making significance. The history of Chinese phonology in the 20 ~ (th) century can be regarded as the reception history of Gao Benhan's the study of Chinese phonology. From the perspective of reception history, this paper makes a detailed analysis and discussion on Gao Benhan's "study of Chinese phonology" under the framework of the history of phonology, so as to probe into what kind of revolution Gaobenhan has brought to Chinese phonology. What kind of influence. This article consists of six chapters, which discuss the reception history of Gao Benhan's the study of Chinese phonology from the aspects of symbols, materials, viewpoints, methods and dialects. This paper probes into the influence of Gao Benhan's study of Chinese phonology on Chinese phonology and even on the whole study of Chinese phonology. The first chapter discusses the contribution of Takamoto to the marking of Chinese phonetic symbols and the usage of phonetic symbols. In the second chapter, the author discusses Gao Ben-han 's views on the relationship between rhyme map and "Chi Yun", on the use of sound materials, on the properties of modern reverse materials, and on the influence of these views on later generations. In the third chapter, the author discusses Gao Benhan's phonetic system and the later scholars' acceptance of Gao Benhan's phonetic system. Because of the difference of academic viewpoint and purpose, Gao Ben-han proposed a more detailed consonant and vowel system for "Qieyun", and later scholars revised it from the perspective of phonology, but this can not be regarded as the negation of Gaobenhan. Without the pioneering work of Takamoto, it is impossible to analyze the phonetics from the perspective of phonology. In the fourth chapter, the "atypical" historical comparative method used by Gao Ben-han in the study of Chinese phonology is discussed, and the difference between the "atypical" historical comparative method and the typical historical comparative method in the 19th century is analyzed. It is pointed out that the "atypical" historical comparative method used by Gao Benghan is the intermediary for Chinese scholars to accept the historical comparative method. A lot of scholars in later generations used the classical historical comparative method in the 19th century to carry out the comparative study of Chinese dialects, but they were not widely accepted. Chapter five discusses Gao Benhan's contribution to the investigation and study of Chinese dialects. Gao Benhan has pointed out in the study of Chinese phonology that Shanxi dialect is different from the surrounding Mandarin dialect. He thinks that Wenshui, Xingxian, Taigu, Naturalization and Fengtai are very strange and important dialects. This is the early scholars concerned about the uniqueness of Jin dialect important research results. In addition, the investigation and study of Gao Benhan to Lanyin Mandarin, Central Plains Mandarin, Jianghuai Mandarin, Wu dialect, Guangdong dialect and Min dialect all showed the typical characteristics and detailed phonetic characteristics of these dialects 100 years ago. The sixth chapter summarizes the analysis and discussion of the first five chapters, at the same time, from the point of view of academic history, it puts forward that we should put forward in the "Chi Yun" and modern dialects. The relationship between phonetic construction and phonological construction and the relationship between elements and structure are reunderstood.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H116
本文编号：2131800
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the history of reception, the past studies of the history of acceptance have made achievements in literature, art and philosophy, but lack of the history of linguistic acceptance. From the perspective of the history of phonology, the previous researches on the history of Chinese phonology are mainly focused on the study of the ancient phonological history of the Qing Dynasty, but the study of Chinese phonology, which has an important impact on modern Chinese phonology, is seldom discussed. Gao Benhan's study of Chinese phonology marks the beginning of modern Chinese phonology and has epoch-making significance. The history of Chinese phonology in the 20 ~ (th) century can be regarded as the reception history of Gao Benhan's the study of Chinese phonology. From the perspective of reception history, this paper makes a detailed analysis and discussion on Gao Benhan's "study of Chinese phonology" under the framework of the history of phonology, so as to probe into what kind of revolution Gaobenhan has brought to Chinese phonology. What kind of influence. This article consists of six chapters, which discuss the reception history of Gao Benhan's the study of Chinese phonology from the aspects of symbols, materials, viewpoints, methods and dialects. This paper probes into the influence of Gao Benhan's study of Chinese phonology on Chinese phonology and even on the whole study of Chinese phonology. The first chapter discusses the contribution of Takamoto to the marking of Chinese phonetic symbols and the usage of phonetic symbols. In the second chapter, the author discusses Gao Ben-han 's views on the relationship between rhyme map and "Chi Yun", on the use of sound materials, on the properties of modern reverse materials, and on the influence of these views on later generations. In the third chapter, the author discusses Gao Benhan's phonetic system and the later scholars' acceptance of Gao Benhan's phonetic system. Because of the difference of academic viewpoint and purpose, Gao Ben-han proposed a more detailed consonant and vowel system for "Qieyun", and later scholars revised it from the perspective of phonology, but this can not be regarded as the negation of Gaobenhan. Without the pioneering work of Takamoto, it is impossible to analyze the phonetics from the perspective of phonology. In the fourth chapter, the "atypical" historical comparative method used by Gao Ben-han in the study of Chinese phonology is discussed, and the difference between the "atypical" historical comparative method and the typical historical comparative method in the 19th century is analyzed. It is pointed out that the "atypical" historical comparative method used by Gao Benghan is the intermediary for Chinese scholars to accept the historical comparative method. A lot of scholars in later generations used the classical historical comparative method in the 19th century to carry out the comparative study of Chinese dialects, but they were not widely accepted. Chapter five discusses Gao Benhan's contribution to the investigation and study of Chinese dialects. Gao Benhan has pointed out in the study of Chinese phonology that Shanxi dialect is different from the surrounding Mandarin dialect. He thinks that Wenshui, Xingxian, Taigu, Naturalization and Fengtai are very strange and important dialects. This is the early scholars concerned about the uniqueness of Jin dialect important research results. In addition, the investigation and study of Gao Benhan to Lanyin Mandarin, Central Plains Mandarin, Jianghuai Mandarin, Wu dialect, Guangdong dialect and Min dialect all showed the typical characteristics and detailed phonetic characteristics of these dialects 100 years ago. The sixth chapter summarizes the analysis and discussion of the first five chapters, at the same time, from the point of view of academic history, it puts forward that we should put forward in the "Chi Yun" and modern dialects. The relationship between phonetic construction and phonological construction and the relationship between elements and structure are reunderstood.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H116
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 侯精一;温端政;田希诚;;山西方言的分区(稿)[J];方言;1986年02期
2 侯精一;;晋语的分区(稿)[J];方言;1986年04期
3 李蓝;;“中国通用音标符号集”及若干问题的说明[J];方言;2006年03期
4 侯精一;;《中国音韵学研究》与现代山西方言音韵——纪念瑞典著名汉学家高本汉调查山西方言100年[J];方言;2011年03期
5 鲁国尧;论“历史文献考证法”与“历史比较法”的结合——兼议汉语研究中的“犬马鬼魅法则”[J];古汉语研究;2003年01期
6 麦耘;关于章组声母翘舌化的动因问题[J];古汉语研究;1994年01期
7 李无未;秦曰龙;;高本汉“二手材料”构拟《广韵》之检讨[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2008年01期
8 罗杰瑞;闽方言中的来母字和早期汉语[J];民族语文;2005年04期
9 方环海;民族对音比较法与汉语音韵学研究[J];内蒙古大学学报(人文社会科学版);2002年02期
10 冯蒸;高本汉、董同(龠禾)、王力、李方桂拟测汉语中古和上古元音系统方法管窥:元音类型说——历史语言学札记之一[J];首都师范大学学报(社会科学版);2004年05期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 周傲生;《切韵》的音韵格局[D];浙江大学;2008年
2 孙小花;山西方言语音历史层次研究[D];上海师范大学;2006年
，本文编号：2131800
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2131800.html
