语料库视野下的现代汉语空间属性义场代表字义项分布研究
发布时间：2018-07-28 14:02
【摘要】：20世纪90年代,随着语料库技术的蓬勃发展,词典编纂者逐渐着眼于将语言学研究和词典编纂与语料库技术相结合,形成定性定量的研究方法。论文正是以此技术为支撑,结合定量研究和定性分析,从全新的视角对《现代汉语词典》(第6版)中的“远’“大”、“小”、“高”、“低”五个空间属性义场代表字的义项分布进行重新审视,并对其释义方面存在的问题提出参考性建议。 论文的第一部分为序言,对词典释义的国内外研究现状、水平和发展趋势进行了回顾与展望,并归纳出语文性词典已有的几条义项建立原则,以此为基础,我们还提出了自己的义项补录原则,即最低频次原则。 第二部分为第一章至第五章。分别以“远”、“大”、“小”、“高”、“低”为研究对象,在分析相关语料的基础上,认为“远”字存在释义不当的问题,并漏收两个义项；“大’字释义也漏收了两个义项；“小”字释义漏收了三个义项；“高”字释义多收一个义项,漏收两个义项,同时还存在释义不当的问题；“低”字释义存在两个释义不当的义项,并且漏收了两个义项。针对每个字释义中存在的问题,以语言学和词典学等相关理论为指导,论文提出相关的修正与补录建议。 第三部分为结语,主要对文章五个研究对象的义项分布进行总结,并对其释义中存在的问题进行归纳。
[Abstract]:In the 1990s, with the rapid development of corpus technology, lexicographers gradually focused on the combination of linguistic research and lexicography with corpus technology to form qualitative and quantitative research methods. This paper is based on this technology, combined with quantitative research and qualitative analysis, from a new perspective, "far'" big "," small "," high "in the" Modern Chinese Dictionary "(6th edition), The meaning distribution of the "low" five spatial attribute semantic fields is reexamined, and the problems in its interpretation are put forward for reference. The first part of the thesis is the preface, which reviews the present situation, level and development trend of the dictionary interpretation at home and abroad, and sums up the principles for the establishment of several meanings in Chinese dictionaries. We also put forward our own principle of meaning supplement, that is, the principle of minimum frequency. The second part is chapter one to chapter five. Taking "far", "big", "small", "Gao" and "low" as the research objects, the author thinks that the word "far" has the problem of improper interpretation on the basis of analyzing the relevant corpus, and omits two meanings. The interpretation of the word "big" also contains two meanings, the interpretation of "small" contains three meanings, the interpretation of the word "Gao" receives one more meaning, and the interpretation of the word "Gao" contains two meanings, at the same time, there is the problem of improper interpretation. There are two improper meanings in the interpretation of the word "low", and two meanings are omitted. In view of the problems existing in the interpretation of each word, this paper puts forward some suggestions for correction and supplement under the guidance of the relevant theories of linguistics and lexicography. The third part is the conclusion, mainly summarizes the meaning distribution of the five research objects, and summarizes the existing problems in its interpretation.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H136;H164
[Abstract]:In the 1990s, with the rapid development of corpus technology, lexicographers gradually focused on the combination of linguistic research and lexicography with corpus technology to form qualitative and quantitative research methods. This paper is based on this technology, combined with quantitative research and qualitative analysis, from a new perspective, "far'" big "," small "," high "in the" Modern Chinese Dictionary "(6th edition), The meaning distribution of the "low" five spatial attribute semantic fields is reexamined, and the problems in its interpretation are put forward for reference. The first part of the thesis is the preface, which reviews the present situation, level and development trend of the dictionary interpretation at home and abroad, and sums up the principles for the establishment of several meanings in Chinese dictionaries. We also put forward our own principle of meaning supplement, that is, the principle of minimum frequency. The second part is chapter one to chapter five. Taking "far", "big", "small", "Gao" and "low" as the research objects, the author thinks that the word "far" has the problem of improper interpretation on the basis of analyzing the relevant corpus, and omits two meanings. The interpretation of the word "big" also contains two meanings, the interpretation of "small" contains three meanings, the interpretation of the word "Gao" receives one more meaning, and the interpretation of the word "Gao" contains two meanings, at the same time, there is the problem of improper interpretation. There are two improper meanings in the interpretation of the word "low", and two meanings are omitted. In view of the problems existing in the interpretation of each word, this paper puts forward some suggestions for correction and supplement under the guidance of the relevant theories of linguistics and lexicography. The third part is the conclusion, mainly summarizes the meaning distribution of the five research objects, and summarizes the existing problems in its interpretation.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H136;H164
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王永耀;;语料库介入的汉语语文词典释义途径[J];辞书研究;2010年01期
2 杨建军;;汉语古籍语料库的建立原则[J];辞书研究;2006年02期
3 胡明扬;现代汉语通用语料库的建库原则和设想[J];语言文字应用;1992年03期
4 张文贤;邱立坤;;基于语料库的关联词搭配研究[J];世界汉语教学;2007年04期
5 杨彬;;基于HSK动态作文语料库的“巴不得—恨不得”研究[J];青年文学家;2011年04期
6 张普;关于大规模真实文本语料库的几点理论思考[J];语言文字应用;1999年01期
7 朱红;;基于语料库的汉语第一人称代词分析[J];古汉语研究;2011年01期
8 于龙;陶本一;;识字教学的问题与对策——基于语料库的小学语文教材用字研究[J];语言文字应用;2010年01期
9 刘姝s，
本文编号：2150438
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2150438.html
