人称代词“他”句内回指的歧义

发布时间：2018-08-26 13:58

【摘要】：回指现象白二十世纪七十年代开始就已成为语言学研究的中心课题之一,然而,学界对于第三人称代词句内回指歧义的研究却还非常有限。本文在三个平面理论的基础之上采用归纳法和演绎法相结合、格式法和次范畴化法相结合、语境构拟法等研究方法,从回指歧义的分布、产生原因、常见句法结构类型、回指影响因素以及消解途径五个方面对这个问题展开系统的分析。本文的正文部分由五个章节组成。第一章的绪论部分介绍了文章的研究对象、方法及语料来源,并对以往的相关研究进行了全面的梳理。这部分在肯定了以往相关研究的同时,也指出了他们的不足之处,并以此为依据提出了本文的研究意义及研究目标。第二章着力于全面讨论回指结构的分布。首先,根据词源归纳了“他”的指向性功能特点和常见的指向类型。然后,分别研究了“他”与先行语各自的句法分布规律,并将二者在同一个句子中可能的组合对应关系进行总结,为下文归纳歧义类型、探讨判定原则提供依据。第三章着重分析了本文的主要研究对象——回指歧义现象。首先,在第二章分布的基础上归纳回指歧义多发的句法结构类型。然后,分别从句法、语义、语用和认知四个方面分析了回指歧义产生的原因及影响歧义判定的因素。在肯定了这些表层句法判定因素作用的同时,也依据实例提出了质疑,为下文研究具体的判定方法做铺垫。第四章着重探讨了歧义的消解方法。这部分以句法分析方法引出,介绍肯定了句法表层消歧方法的同时也指出了它们所不能解释的回指歧义情况,并辅以语义、语用、认知心理等方法对句法消歧的遗漏现象进行分析。在本章的最后,文章尝试提出了“四步筛选法”,认为应以综合系统的方法解决回指歧义问题。第五章结语部分就本文的创新和不足之处进行了总结陈述。
[Abstract]:Anaphora phenomenon has been one of the central topics in linguistic research since 1970s. However, the research on the inner-anaphora ambiguity in third-person pronouns is still very limited. On the basis of three plane theories, this paper uses the methods of induction and deduction, format and subcategorization, contextual construction, and so on, to analyze the distribution of anaphora ambiguity, the causes of anaphora ambiguity, and the common syntactic structure types. The anaphora influencing factors and dissolving ways are analyzed systematically. The text of this paper consists of five chapters. The introduction of the first chapter introduces the research object, methods and sources of the corpus, and makes a comprehensive review of the previous related studies. In this part, while affirming the previous related research, it also points out their shortcomings, and puts forward the significance and research goal of this paper. Chapter two focuses on the distribution of anaphora structure. First of all, according to the etymology, the author summarizes the characteristics of the directed function and the common types of direction. Then, the syntactic distribution of "he" and antecedents are studied respectively, and the corresponding relationship between them in the same sentence is summarized, which provides the basis for the following induction of ambiguity types and the discussion of judgment principles. Chapter three focuses on anaphora ambiguity. Firstly, the syntactic structure types of anaphora ambiguity are summarized on the basis of chapter 2 distribution. Then, the causes of anaphora ambiguity and the factors influencing the judgment of anaphora ambiguity are analyzed from syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and cognitive aspects. While affirming the function of these surface syntactic judgment factors, it also puts forward the query according to the examples, which paves the way for the following research on the specific judgment methods. Chapter four focuses on the methods of ambiguity resolution. This part is led by syntactic analysis, introducing and affirming syntactic surface disambiguation methods, and pointing out the anaphora ambiguity which they cannot interpret, and supplemented by semantic and pragmatic. Cognitive psychology and other methods are used to analyze the omission of syntactic disambiguation. At the end of this chapter, we try to put forward the "four-step screening method" and think that the anaphora ambiguity problem should be solved by comprehensive and systematic method. The fifth chapter summarizes the innovation and deficiency of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】