中英文足球新闻标题中隐喻的对比研究

发布时间：2018-09-05 21:05

【摘要】：自从《我们赖以生存的隐喻》于1980年问世以来,语言学家们对探究Lakoff和Johnson在书中所宣称的隐喻的普遍性表现出了广泛而热切的兴趣。对于涉及各个领域的------包括政治、经济、文化、文学甚至自然科学方面话语中的隐喻研究层出不穷。然而,对于体育新闻尤其是足球新闻却鲜有涉及。足球作为最受欢迎的大众运动,相比于其他运动,在世界范围内拥有为数最多的运动参与者、最多的比赛观众以及最多的网络和报纸新闻的读者。这使得对足球新闻话语中的因与现象进行研究成为必要。本文通过对从中英文足球新闻媒体上收集的新闻标题中的概念隐喻进行分类和分析,探索足球新闻中隐喻的特点,并试图发现中英文概念隐喻的相同点与区别及其原因。文中涉及的语料分为中英文两组,每组分别由从中英文足球媒体官方网站随机选取的200个新闻标题组成。基于媒体本身的受众数量、报道权威性以及数据可用性方面考虑,我们分别选取了英国的《太阳报》、《卫报》和中国的《体坛周报》、《足球报》作为数据来源。经过分析,在所搜集的标题中一共发现了484个隐喻,其中英文263个,中文221个。包括结构隐喻、本体隐喻、方位隐喻及其具体分类在内的各种概念隐喻在中英文足球新闻标题中都有发现。此外,研究还发现,在中英文标题中结构隐喻数量最多,而方位隐喻表述最少；在具体分类中,中英文战争隐喻所占比重均为最大。研究结果证明了隐喻普遍存在于两组数据中,并且基于人类近乎相似的认知模式和相近的探索未知的方法,中英文足球新闻标题中的隐喻概念也大体类似。然而研究同时发现了,两组数据中的概念隐喻的类型与出现概率并不完全相符------其中有些隐喻类型在中英文数据中的分布差距较大。例如,商业隐喻和实体隐喻在英文标题中所占比例要明显高于其在中文标题中的比例,而学校隐喻则只存在于中文标题中。
[Abstract]:Since the publication of metaphor for our Survival in 1980, linguists have shown extensive and keen interest in exploring the universality of metaphors claimed by Lakoff and Johnson in the book. Metaphorical studies in discourse in various fields, including politics, economics, culture, literature and even natural science, are endless. However, sports news, especially football news, is rarely involved. As the most popular mass sport, football has the largest number of sports participants, the largest audience and the most readers of the online and newspaper news in the world, compared with other sports. This makes it necessary to study the causes and phenomena in football news discourse. Based on the classification and analysis of conceptual metaphors in news headlines collected from Chinese and English football news media, this paper explores the characteristics of metaphors in football news, and tries to find out the similarities and differences between Chinese and English conceptual metaphors and their causes. The corpus is divided into Chinese and English groups, each group is composed of 200 news headlines randomly selected from the official website of Chinese and English football media. Based on the number of media audience, the authority of the report and the availability of data, we chose the British Sun, the Guardian and the Chinese Sports Weekly, Football News as the data sources. Through analysis, 484 metaphors were found in the collected titles, 263 in English and 221 in Chinese. Various conceptual metaphors, including structural metaphors, ontological metaphors, locational metaphors and their specific classifications, are found in English and Chinese football headlines. In addition, it is found that the number of structural metaphors in Chinese and English titles is the highest, while the number of orientational metaphors is the least, and the proportion of war metaphors in English and Chinese is the largest in specific classification. The results show that metaphors generally exist in two groups of data and are based on similar cognitive patterns and similar approaches to explore the unknown. The concept of metaphor in Chinese and English football headlines is similar in general. However, it is also found that the types of conceptual metaphors in the two sets of data are not exactly consistent with the probability of occurrence, and some of the metaphorical types in both Chinese and English data have a large distribution gap. For example, the proportion of commercial and substantive metaphors in English headlines is significantly higher than that in Chinese titles, while school metaphors only exist in Chinese titles.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H15;H315

【参考文献】