论语篇构式压制
发布时间：2018-10-08 06:56
【摘要】：语篇层面的压制是一种非常普遍的语言现象。同其他构式一样，语篇作为一个独立的构式单位，当其形式和功能相互冲突时，就产生了语篇构式压制。然而，作为认知和功能语言学分支的构式语法却没有将构式的思想扩展到语篇的范围。 研究语篇构式压制是十分必要的。首先从大的方面来看，构式语法仍局限在句子层面以内的研究，对语篇的研究还远远不够，语篇构式语法仍不成气候；其次，，构式语法有关压制语篇尚未进行深入细致的研究，对其形成机制等方面进行的研究严重不足；此外，语篇构式压制研究的理论基础不应局限于构式语法本身。 本研究针对语言研究的这一中心话题，秉承认知语法和构式语法的基本观点，通过在语篇构式语法中分析语篇压制现象，试图将语篇构式压制这种语言现象和人类的认知能力结合起来，并运用隐喻、转喻及间接言语行为理论对语篇构式压制做出新的阐释。讨论主要从三方面展开：压制语篇在词汇特征、修辞特征、结构特征及语域特征等方面的体现及语篇构式压制的普遍性；语篇构式压制的生成机制；语篇构式压制的特征。通过研究分析，以期加深人们对语篇构式压制的认识，了解语篇构式压制的本质。总之，本研究旨在对语篇构式压制现象有一个更深入的理解，并希望能够为丰富语篇构式语法的框架提供可能性。 论文分为五个部分。第一部分介绍了语篇构式压制的概念，并回顾了以往的研究。第二部分从五个方面描写了语篇构式压制现象。这五个方面分别是：词汇特征、语法特征、押韵特征、结构特征和语域特征。大量语料表明，虽然与常规语篇相比，压制语篇是一种非常规现象，但十分普遍。作为一种普遍存在的现象，语篇构式压制应受到语言学家更多的关注。第三部分阐释了语篇构式压制的形成机制。研究表明，语篇构式压制是基于两种相互关联却又相互不同的思维机制——隐喻、转喻而产生的。隐喻解释了语篇的多义性，而转喻解释了语篇的凸显性。隐喻与转喻共同存在并作用于语篇构式压制。同时，间接言语行为理论也为阐释语篇构式压制的生成机制提供了角度，使得对语篇构式压制的解释更具说服力。第四部分讨论了语篇构式压制的两大特征——压制强度等级和语篇性。压制强度等级说明语篇构式压制的多样性，而语篇性使得压制语篇能够区分于语用失误。第五部分对论文的成果及局限性做了总结。 研究表明，语篇构式压制是一种普遍存在的现象；隐喻与转喻是语篇构式压制形成的重要机制；语篇构式压制中的压制现象具有等级性与多样性，并不局限于某一固定的模式；语篇构式压制具有语篇性特征，不同于语用失误。
[Abstract]:The suppression of discourse is a very common linguistic phenomenon. As with other constructions, text, as an independent construction unit, produces textual suppression when its form and function conflict with each other. However, construction grammar, as a branch of cognitive and functional linguistics, does not extend the idea of construction to the scope of discourse. It is necessary to study the suppression of discourse construction. First of all, from a large perspective, the study of construction grammar is still confined to the sentence level, the study of discourse is far from enough, and the textual construction grammar is still not a climate. Secondly, the study on the suppression of discourse by construction grammar has not been thoroughly and meticulously studied. In addition, the theoretical basis of the study on the suppression of discourse construction should not be limited to the construction grammar itself. In view of the central topic of language study, this study is based on the basic viewpoints of cognitive grammar and constructional grammar, and analyzes the phenomenon of discourse suppression in discourse construction grammar. This paper attempts to combine the linguistic phenomenon of discourse construction suppression with human cognitive ability, and uses metaphor, metonymy and indirect speech act theory to make a new interpretation of discourse construction suppression. The discussion mainly includes three aspects: the embodiment of the lexical, rhetorical, structural and register features of the suppression of discourse, the generative mechanism of the suppression of the discourse construction, and the characteristics of the suppression of the discourse construction. Through the research and analysis, we hope to deepen people's understanding of text construction suppression and understand the nature of text construction suppression. In conclusion, the present study aims to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of discourse construction suppression, and hopes to provide a possibility for enriching the framework of discourse construction grammar. The paper is divided into five parts. The first part introduces the concept of discourse suppression and reviews previous studies. The second part describes the phenomenon of discourse suppression from five aspects. These five aspects are: lexical features, grammatical features, rhyme features, structural features and register features. A large number of data show that suppression of discourse is an unconventional phenomenon compared with conventional discourse, but it is very common. As a common phenomenon, discourse construction suppression should be paid more attention by linguists. The third part explains the formation mechanism of discourse structure suppression. The research shows that the suppression of discourse construction is based on two interrelated but different thinking mechanisms-metaphor and metonymy. Metaphor explains the polysemy of the text, while metonymy explains the salience of the text. Metaphor and metonymy co-exist and act on textual suppression. At the same time, the theory of indirect speech act also provides an angle to explain the formation mechanism of discourse construction suppression, which makes the interpretation of text construction suppression more persuasive. In the fourth part, we discuss the two characteristics of textual construction suppression, namely, the level of suppression intensity and discourse. The level of suppression intensity illustrates the diversity of textual suppression, while discourse makes it possible to distinguish suppressed texts from pragmatic failures. The fifth part summarizes the achievements and limitations of the paper. The research shows that the suppression of discourse construction is a common phenomenon, that metaphor and metonymy are the important mechanism of the formation of the suppression of discourse construction, that the phenomenon of suppression in the suppression of discourse construction is hierarchical and diverse, and that it is not limited to a fixed pattern. Textual suppression is different from pragmatic failure in that it is textual in nature.
【学位授予单位】：曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H05
本文编号：2255854
[Abstract]:The suppression of discourse is a very common linguistic phenomenon. As with other constructions, text, as an independent construction unit, produces textual suppression when its form and function conflict with each other. However, construction grammar, as a branch of cognitive and functional linguistics, does not extend the idea of construction to the scope of discourse. It is necessary to study the suppression of discourse construction. First of all, from a large perspective, the study of construction grammar is still confined to the sentence level, the study of discourse is far from enough, and the textual construction grammar is still not a climate. Secondly, the study on the suppression of discourse by construction grammar has not been thoroughly and meticulously studied. In addition, the theoretical basis of the study on the suppression of discourse construction should not be limited to the construction grammar itself. In view of the central topic of language study, this study is based on the basic viewpoints of cognitive grammar and constructional grammar, and analyzes the phenomenon of discourse suppression in discourse construction grammar. This paper attempts to combine the linguistic phenomenon of discourse construction suppression with human cognitive ability, and uses metaphor, metonymy and indirect speech act theory to make a new interpretation of discourse construction suppression. The discussion mainly includes three aspects: the embodiment of the lexical, rhetorical, structural and register features of the suppression of discourse, the generative mechanism of the suppression of the discourse construction, and the characteristics of the suppression of the discourse construction. Through the research and analysis, we hope to deepen people's understanding of text construction suppression and understand the nature of text construction suppression. In conclusion, the present study aims to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of discourse construction suppression, and hopes to provide a possibility for enriching the framework of discourse construction grammar. The paper is divided into five parts. The first part introduces the concept of discourse suppression and reviews previous studies. The second part describes the phenomenon of discourse suppression from five aspects. These five aspects are: lexical features, grammatical features, rhyme features, structural features and register features. A large number of data show that suppression of discourse is an unconventional phenomenon compared with conventional discourse, but it is very common. As a common phenomenon, discourse construction suppression should be paid more attention by linguists. The third part explains the formation mechanism of discourse structure suppression. The research shows that the suppression of discourse construction is based on two interrelated but different thinking mechanisms-metaphor and metonymy. Metaphor explains the polysemy of the text, while metonymy explains the salience of the text. Metaphor and metonymy co-exist and act on textual suppression. At the same time, the theory of indirect speech act also provides an angle to explain the formation mechanism of discourse construction suppression, which makes the interpretation of text construction suppression more persuasive. In the fourth part, we discuss the two characteristics of textual construction suppression, namely, the level of suppression intensity and discourse. The level of suppression intensity illustrates the diversity of textual suppression, while discourse makes it possible to distinguish suppressed texts from pragmatic failures. The fifth part summarizes the achievements and limitations of the paper. The research shows that the suppression of discourse construction is a common phenomenon, that metaphor and metonymy are the important mechanism of the formation of the suppression of discourse construction, that the phenomenon of suppression in the suppression of discourse construction is hierarchical and diverse, and that it is not limited to a fixed pattern. Textual suppression is different from pragmatic failure in that it is textual in nature.
【学位授予单位】：曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 袁野;;构式压制、转喻和广义转喻框架[J];外国语言文学;2010年03期
2 李勇忠;构式义、转喻与句式压制[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2004年02期
3 董成如;杨才元;;构式对词项压制的探索[J];外语学刊;2009年05期
4 崔雅丽;;构式压制对语言异质现象的阐释[J];外国语文;2011年03期
5 袁野;;论构式压制的转喻阐释[J];天津外国语学院学报;2010年04期
6 李勇忠;语义压制的转喻理据[J];外语教学与研究;2004年06期
7 王寅;;构式压制、词汇压制和惯性压制[J];外语与外语教学;2009年12期
8 王寅;;“新被字构式”的词汇压制解析——对“被自愿”一类新表达的认知构式语法研究[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2011年03期
9 袁野;;论语篇构式语法及语篇构式压制[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2011年05期
10 袁野;;构式语法、语言压制现象及转喻修辞[J];当代修辞学;2010年03期
本文编号：2255854
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2255854.html
