《智取威虎山》中冲突话语的衔接手段研究
发布时间:2018-10-14 15:44
【摘要】:冲突话语是一种谈话形式,对文学作品,包括小说、散文,尤其是对戏剧都具有重要意义。冲突话语都有一个共同的特征:一方话语与另一方话语发生冲突,这种冲突表现为谈话的一方反对另一方的观点,从而产生话语上的冲突。研究者对冲突话语做了大量和广泛的调查,主要是在语言学,心理学和社会学等领域,但是从衔接手段的角度来对冲突话语,尤其是汉语的冲突话语进行的研究很有限。衔接是语篇分析中的一个重要研究内容,也是语言学理论研究的前沿课题之一。针对冲突话语没有一套系统的研究理论及冲突话语的衔接手段研究不足的现状,本文采用衔接与衔接手段的理论对冲突话语进行系统分析,提供了一个新的角度来看待交际中的冲突现象,同时对解决有着不同利益或者目的的国家,群体或者个人之间的冲突,如何得到话语权,占主导地位起到了借鉴作用。 本文以衔接理论为框架,按照冲突话语的属性,从《智取威虎山》中收集了50个冲突话语的话轮。主要采用定性的研究方法,分析并归纳其衔接手段,辅之以定量研究方法,运用excel软件统计衔接手段的分布规律。通过分析发现《智取威虎山》共运用了八种衔接手段,刚连接,重复,省略,照应,替代,对偶,搭配和下义,其中连接多为隐性连接,这跟汉语语料的句法结构息息相关,汉语重意合,句子成分之间的逻辑关系多表现隐性连接,造句注重意念连贯。此外,本文还对四种特殊的衔接手段,即返回式重复,回收式重复,对偶和比喻性替代进行了论述,这四种特殊的衔接手段灵活而富有艺术性,能够更有力的反击对方,打击对方的攻势,有效的保持主导地位,在汉语中更容易赢得话语权。 木研究《智取威虎山》中的冲突话语向我们提供了各种灵活的衔接手段,通过研究其衔接手段并把握其规律,一方面提高对文学作品的理解和鉴赏,另一方面在语言学和翻译领域均具有较大的启发意义。
[Abstract]:Conflict discourse is a form of conversation, which is of great significance to literary works, including novels, prose, and especially to drama. The conflict discourse has a common characteristic: one side and the other side conflict, which is the conflict between the one side and the other side, which leads to the conflict in the discourse. Researchers have done a lot of research on conflict discourse, mainly in the fields of linguistics, psychology and sociology, but the research on conflict discourse, especially in Chinese, is very limited from the perspective of cohesive devices. Cohesion is an important research content in discourse analysis, and it is also one of the frontier topics in linguistic theory. In view of the fact that there is no systematic research on conflict discourse and the lack of research on cohesive devices of conflict discourse, this paper makes a systematic analysis of conflict discourse by using the theory of cohesion and cohesion. It provides a new perspective on the phenomenon of conflict in communication and plays a leading role in solving the conflicts between countries, groups or individuals with different interests or purposes, and how to get the right to speak. Based on cohesion theory and according to the nature of conflict discourse, this paper collects 50 rounds of conflict discourse from Wisdom to Weihu Mountain. This paper mainly adopts the qualitative research method, analyzes and induces its cohesive devices, supplemented by quantitative research methods, and uses excel software to calculate the distribution of cohesive devices. Through analysis, it is found that eight kinds of cohesive devices are used, namely, rigid connection, repetition, ellipsis, anaphora, substitution, duality, collocation and lower meaning, in which the link is mostly tacit, which is closely related to the syntactic structure of the Chinese corpus. In Chinese parataxis, the logical relationship between sentence components shows recessive connection and sentence formation pays attention to ideational coherence. In addition, this paper also discusses four special cohesive devices, that is, recoverable repetition, recycling repetition, duality and metaphorical substitution. These four special cohesive devices are flexible and artistic, and can fight back against each other more effectively. It is easier to win the right to speak in the Chinese language by attacking the other side's offensive and effectively maintaining the dominant position. The conflict discourse in Takeshi Weihu Mountain provides us with a variety of flexible cohesive devices. On the one hand, we can improve our understanding and appreciation of literary works by studying their cohesive devices and grasping their laws. On the other hand, it has great enlightening significance in the field of linguistics and translation.
【学位授予单位】:北京林业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H136
本文编号:2270902
[Abstract]:Conflict discourse is a form of conversation, which is of great significance to literary works, including novels, prose, and especially to drama. The conflict discourse has a common characteristic: one side and the other side conflict, which is the conflict between the one side and the other side, which leads to the conflict in the discourse. Researchers have done a lot of research on conflict discourse, mainly in the fields of linguistics, psychology and sociology, but the research on conflict discourse, especially in Chinese, is very limited from the perspective of cohesive devices. Cohesion is an important research content in discourse analysis, and it is also one of the frontier topics in linguistic theory. In view of the fact that there is no systematic research on conflict discourse and the lack of research on cohesive devices of conflict discourse, this paper makes a systematic analysis of conflict discourse by using the theory of cohesion and cohesion. It provides a new perspective on the phenomenon of conflict in communication and plays a leading role in solving the conflicts between countries, groups or individuals with different interests or purposes, and how to get the right to speak. Based on cohesion theory and according to the nature of conflict discourse, this paper collects 50 rounds of conflict discourse from Wisdom to Weihu Mountain. This paper mainly adopts the qualitative research method, analyzes and induces its cohesive devices, supplemented by quantitative research methods, and uses excel software to calculate the distribution of cohesive devices. Through analysis, it is found that eight kinds of cohesive devices are used, namely, rigid connection, repetition, ellipsis, anaphora, substitution, duality, collocation and lower meaning, in which the link is mostly tacit, which is closely related to the syntactic structure of the Chinese corpus. In Chinese parataxis, the logical relationship between sentence components shows recessive connection and sentence formation pays attention to ideational coherence. In addition, this paper also discusses four special cohesive devices, that is, recoverable repetition, recycling repetition, duality and metaphorical substitution. These four special cohesive devices are flexible and artistic, and can fight back against each other more effectively. It is easier to win the right to speak in the Chinese language by attacking the other side's offensive and effectively maintaining the dominant position. The conflict discourse in Takeshi Weihu Mountain provides us with a variety of flexible cohesive devices. On the one hand, we can improve our understanding and appreciation of literary works by studying their cohesive devices and grasping their laws. On the other hand, it has great enlightening significance in the field of linguistics and translation.
【学位授予单位】:北京林业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H136
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王婷;文慧;;唐宋词的词汇衔接分析[J];辽宁科技大学学报;2011年01期
2 刘红见;胡晓琼;;林肯《葛底斯堡》演说中词汇衔接分析[J];和田师范专科学校学报;2008年02期
3 张德禄;语篇跨类衔接研究[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2002年06期
4 赵英玲;冲突话语分析[J];外语学刊;2004年05期
5 徐玉臣;英汉语言主要衔接手段的对比分析[J];山东外语教学;1996年04期
6 赵忠德,张琳;从关联理论看话语冲突[J];外语教学;2005年01期
7 朱永生;韩礼德的语篇连贯标准外界的误解与自身的不足[J];外语教学与研究;1997年01期
8 李祥云;张德禄;;争吵话语结构特点研究[J];外语与外语教学;2007年12期
9 钱瑗;A COMPARISON OF SOME COHESIVE DEVICES IN ENGLISH AND CHINESE[J];外国语(上海外国语学院学报);1983年01期
10 张德禄;论衔接[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2001年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 赵英玲;汉语冲突话语语用修辞研究[D];东北师范大学;2008年
,本文编号:2270902
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2270902.html