论利科的隐喻观
发布时间：2018-11-04 16:00
【摘要】：隐喻作为一种重要而普遍的语言现象和思维方式,在日常生活中起着不容忽视的作用。法国著名哲学家保罗·利科1975年出版的《活的隐喻》就是专门阐述隐喻问题的著作。他的文论博采各学派之长并加以改造吸收,具有很大的融合性又独具特色。语言哲学家大多不承认隐喻语句具有一种隐喻意义,在表述一个隐喻时,隐喻语句依然具有其严格的字面意义,理解隐喻必须理解隐喻的字面意义。利科把隐喻看作一切意义的结构,它包括一个直接的、首要的和字面上的意义,还包括一个间接的、附加的、转义的、形象化的基于字面意义才能被理解的意义。在利科的整个思想发展历程中,“反思”是他始终遵循的原则。利科把反思看作是一种向自身返回的行为。他通过反思去把握一系列作为中介的隐喻和象征及其信号中所包含的人类存在的意义。 当前,我国对利科的研究取得了一定的成果,但总体上来看,仍不够深入系统。本文拟在潜心研读利科代表作的基础上,通过对利科隐喻观的论述,并结合当代隐喻学者的一些观点,力求对利科的隐喻理论进行更深入系统的探讨,对利科隐喻理论的贡献和局限进行分析和评判,引导人们正确科学地认识隐喻,促进我国隐喻研究的发展。
[Abstract]:Metaphor, as an important and universal language phenomenon and mode of thinking, plays an important role in daily life. Living metaphor, published by the famous French philosopher Paul Liko in 1975, is a book devoted to metaphor. His literary theory takes advantage of various schools of thought and reinvents them, which has great amalgamation and unique features. Most language philosophers do not admit that metaphorical statements have a metaphorical meaning. When expressing a metaphor, metaphorical statements still have their strict literal meaning. To understand metaphor, we must understand the literal meaning of metaphor. Lecker regards metaphor as a structure of all meanings, which includes a direct, primary and literal meaning, as well as an indirect, additional, escaped, and visualized meaning based on the literal meaning. In the whole thought development course of Ricoh, "reflection" is the principle he always follows. Rico sees reflection as an act of return to himself. Through reflection, he grasped a series of metaphors and symbols as intermediaries and the meaning of human existence contained in the signals. At present, some achievements have been made in the research of Ricco in our country, but on the whole, it is still not deep and systematic. On the basis of studying Leko's representative works, this paper tries to make a deeper and systematic study of his metaphorical theory by discussing his metaphorical views and combining with some views of contemporary metaphorists. By analyzing and judging the contribution and limitation of Rico's metaphor theory, we can guide people to understand metaphor correctly and scientifically, and promote the development of metaphor research in China.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H05
本文编号：2310356
[Abstract]:Metaphor, as an important and universal language phenomenon and mode of thinking, plays an important role in daily life. Living metaphor, published by the famous French philosopher Paul Liko in 1975, is a book devoted to metaphor. His literary theory takes advantage of various schools of thought and reinvents them, which has great amalgamation and unique features. Most language philosophers do not admit that metaphorical statements have a metaphorical meaning. When expressing a metaphor, metaphorical statements still have their strict literal meaning. To understand metaphor, we must understand the literal meaning of metaphor. Lecker regards metaphor as a structure of all meanings, which includes a direct, primary and literal meaning, as well as an indirect, additional, escaped, and visualized meaning based on the literal meaning. In the whole thought development course of Ricoh, "reflection" is the principle he always follows. Rico sees reflection as an act of return to himself. Through reflection, he grasped a series of metaphors and symbols as intermediaries and the meaning of human existence contained in the signals. At present, some achievements have been made in the research of Ricco in our country, but on the whole, it is still not deep and systematic. On the basis of studying Leko's representative works, this paper tries to make a deeper and systematic study of his metaphorical theory by discussing his metaphorical views and combining with some views of contemporary metaphorists. By analyzing and judging the contribution and limitation of Rico's metaphor theory, we can guide people to understand metaphor correctly and scientifically, and promote the development of metaphor research in China.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱士群;作为社会认识论的解释学——利科的阐释策略新探[J];安徽大学学报;1998年05期
2 李丹丹;刘利凤;;保罗·利科:文本价值的充分肯定者——略论保罗·利科的辩证解释学语言观[J];长春师范学院学报(人文社会科学版);2009年07期
3 张逸婧;;隐喻与形而上学的关系——德里达和利科关于隐喻的争论[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2009年05期
4 方兴;利科的解释学思想及其对阅读研究的启示[J];法国研究;1999年02期
5 安军,郭贵春;科学隐喻的本质[J];科学技术与辩证法;2005年03期
6 王瑜;;评述保罗·利科《活的隐喻》视阈中的隐喻观[J];芒种;2012年04期
7 张震;;走向隐喻的真理——利科隐喻哲学的基本问题[J];红河学院学报;2009年01期
8 王岳川;利科尔的解释学思想[J];天津社会科学;1998年04期
9 林书武;国外隐喻研究综述[J];外语教学与研究;1997年01期
10 束定芳;试论现代隐喻学的研究目标、方法和任务[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);1996年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 王猛;理解程序论：利科解释学思想研究论稿[D];兰州大学;2006年
2 林济东;隐喻与存在—利科的诠释学思想研究[D];兰州大学;2007年
，本文编号：2310356
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2310356.html
