矛盾修辞的主观性研究

发布时间：2018-12-30 19:36

【摘要】：矛盾修辞来源于古希腊,是一种特殊的修辞手法。"Oxus"的意思是“敏捷的”或“锐利的”,"moros"是指“迟钝的、愚蠢的、傻瓜的”。显然,这个词是由两个相反意义的希腊词根组合而成。字面意义为“敏捷的迟钝者”或“锐智的傻瓜’矛盾修辞常常用来解释那些看似荒谬却意义深刻的表达。前人对于矛盾修辞的研究,主要集中于对矛盾修辞效果和语用功能的研究。20世纪80年代,学者运用“成分分析法”分析矛盾修辞,运用“擦除”和“替换”原则具体分析了矛盾修辞的语义成分,为矛盾修辞的理解提供了新的思路。随着认知语言学的推广及应用,尤其是概念融合理论的提出,研究者又将融合理论注入矛盾修辞的分析过程,结合语境分析,探索矛盾修辞语言环境中的诸多因素。语言学理论的不断发展与矛盾修辞研究的不断结合,从不同视角为人们诠释矛盾修辞的内部属性及理解过程。本文尝试运用认知语言学中的主观性理论分析矛盾修辞现象,运用Langacker提出的同一情景产生不同意象的四个参数：选择、视角、凸显和详细程度分析矛盾修辞。此外,文章分析了矛盾修辞的主观大量及主观小量,发现矛盾修辞具有主观量特点。研究表明,主观性理论适应并促进矛盾修辞的研究。对矛盾修辞的主观性及主观量的研究,可以验证并拓展主观性理论在语言分析上的适用范围。本文分为五个章节,第一章介绍研究矛盾修辞的背景知识,指出本文研究的意义所在。第二章“文献综述”概述矛盾修辞的定义、分类、修辞效果,回顾前人对于矛盾修辞这一语言现象的研究成果。第三章为理论框架的概述,着重论述Langacker主观性理论的理论体系,为分析矛盾修辞的主观性提供理论基础。第四章研究矛盾修辞主观性的运行机制,从选择、视角、凸显和详细程度探索矛盾修辞主观性的运行规律,并拓展分析矛盾修辞主观量问题。分析得出矛盾修辞具有主观大量及主观小量的主观量属性。第五章总结全文,提出文章研究的不足之处,以及对于今后研究的设想与展望。
[Abstract]:"Oxus" means "quick" or "sharp", and "moros" means "dull, stupid, stupid". Obviously, the word is a combination of two Greek roots in the opposite sense. Paradoxical rhetoric literally means "agility dull" or "sharp fool" is often used to explain seemingly absurd but profound expressions. Previous researches on contradiction rhetoric mainly focus on the effects and pragmatic functions of contradiction rhetoric. In the 1980s, scholars used "component analysis" to analyze contradictory rhetoric. This paper analyzes the semantic components of contradiction rhetoric by using the principles of erasure and substitution, which provides a new way of understanding contradiction rhetoric. With the popularization and application of cognitive linguistics, especially the concept fusion theory, the researchers inject the fusion theory into the analysis process of contradiction rhetoric, and combine context analysis to explore many factors in the language environment of contradiction rhetoric. With the development of linguistic theory and the unceasing combination of antinomy rhetoric research, the internal attributes and understanding process of contradictory rhetoric are interpreted from different perspectives. This paper attempts to use the subjective theory of cognitive linguistics to analyze the phenomenon of contradictory rhetoric, and to use the four parameters of the same scene proposed by Langacker to produce different images: choice, perspective, prominence and detailed analysis of contradictory rhetoric. In addition, this paper analyzes the subjective mass and small quantity of contradiction rhetoric, and finds that contradiction rhetoric has subjective characteristics. The research shows that the subjective theory adapts and promotes the study of contradictory rhetoric. The research on subjectivity and subjective quantity of contradictory rhetoric can verify and expand the scope of application of subjectivity theory in language analysis. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter introduces the background of the study of contradiction rhetoric and points out the significance of this study. Chapter two, "Literature Review", summarizes the definition, classification and rhetorical effect of contradiction rhetoric. Chapter three is an overview of the theoretical framework, focusing on the theoretical system of Langacker's subjective theory, which provides a theoretical basis for analyzing the subjectivity of contradictory rhetoric. The fourth chapter studies the operation mechanism of the subjectivity of contradiction rhetoric, explores the operation law of subjectivity of contradiction rhetoric from the perspective of choice, angle of view, highlights and degree of detail, and expands and analyzes the subjective quantity of contradiction rhetoric. The analysis shows that the contradictory rhetoric has the subjective attributes of a large number and a small subjective quantity. The fifth chapter summarizes the full text, puts forward the deficiencies of the article, as well as the future research ideas and prospects.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H05

【参考文献】