字母不是汉字,字母词可有限收录

发布时间：2019-02-13 03:53

【摘要】：最近一段时间,由《现代汉语词典》第6版收录239个字母词引起的争议持续不断,特别是来自语言学界内外的百余位学者于8月29日联名举报这种做法违法并声言字母词危及汉语的纯洁和安全之后,更是引起社会各界对字母词问题的普遍关注,一时之间百家争鸣,意见纷呈。字母词现象错综复杂,人言人殊,看来争论还将持续一个阶段。但是我们发现这次争论固然激烈,学理的深度却显不够。我们觉得应该搁置一些具体环节上的争论,转而着力于字母词本身以及一些相关社会文化问题的学理探究。本期《修辞随谈》邀请到了五位学者就此发表自己的看法。他们视角不同,各有侧重,但都不乏思考的深度。《修辞随谈》致力于成为短兵相接、观点碰撞的学术平台,热诚欢迎您也在字母词的学理层面上参与讨论。若您对此形成了系统的看法,也欢迎写成论文惠赐本刊。
[Abstract]:In recent times, the controversy over the inclusion of 239 letters in the sixth edition of the Modern Chinese Dictionary has continued. In particular, after more than 100 scholars from both inside and outside the linguistic circle jointly reported the violation of the law on August 29 and declared that alphabetic words endanger the purity and safety of Chinese, they have aroused widespread concern about the problem of alphabetical words from all walks of life. For a while a hundred schools of thought contended with each other and opinions were divided. The phenomenon of alphabetical words is complicated, people speak different, it seems that the debate will continue at a stage. But we find that the debate is fierce, but the depth of theory is not enough. We think that we should put aside some of the specific aspects of the debate and focus on the alphabet itself and some related social and cultural issues. In this issue, five scholars have been invited to express their views on this issue. They have different perspectives and different emphases, but they all have the depth of thinking. Rhetoric is dedicated to becoming an academic platform for confrontation and collision of views. You are warmly welcome to participate in the discussion on the academic level of alphabetical words. If you form a systematic view of this, you are also welcome to write a paper to this journal.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学对外汉语学院;
【分类号】：H164

【相似文献】