法律语体中的能愿动词研究
发布时间：2019-03-10 18:00
【摘要】：本文运用了语义学和型式语法的相关理论讨论了法律语体中的能愿动词的分布情况,考察了法律语体和小说语体中的能愿动词使用的差异,重点讨论了法律书面语体中能愿动词的两类常用结构：“Vcw+长介词结构+VP”与“Neg+Vcw+VP+的”,使用型式语法理论分析了法律语体中能愿动词常使用这两类结构的原因,希望以此来对法律语体的能愿动词使用情况进行较全面的分析。本文共分为六章： 第一章为本文研究做铺垫,其中包括与本题目相关的研究情况、选题的目的和意义、界定研究对象以及研究的语料来源和研究方法。 第二章首先对本文研究的能愿动词的定义和范围进行界定,讨论了能愿动词的语法功能,在此基础上统计了能愿动词在法律语体中的分布情况,然后从能愿动词情态语义和法律语体本身特点的角度着重分析了两个主要差异产生的原因：一个是“应当”和“可以”两个能愿动词在法律书面语体中高频出现的原因；另一个则是造成法庭口语中不同角色使用不同能愿动词的原因。 第三章对法律语体中的能愿动词的主要功能进行了讨论,在法律语体中能愿动词功能主要有三：第一,能愿动词可以赋予权力(权利),第二,能愿动词设定义务；第三,能愿动词表达话语立场。 第四章首先把法律书面语体与另一种典型的书面语体(小说语体)中的能愿动词分布情况进行了对比：法律语体中能愿动词种类较小说语体少且分布呈不均衡状态；其次,两种语体中的高频能愿动词和与能愿动词经常共现的句式也存在很大差异：法律书面语体中的句式中包含多个介词结构,并且能愿动词的否定形式远远多于小说语体。最后从语体功能的角度分析了造成两种语体中能愿动词的种种差异的原因。 第五章着重分析法律书面语体中的两种常见句式：“Vcw+长介词结构+VP”和"Neg+Vcw+VP+的”,并分别根据介词结构和后接动词的语义关系与语法角色把两类结构分类。最后利用型式语法的相关理论对两类结构高频出现的原因进行分析,两种结构在法律书面语体高频出现是因为能愿动词和结构之间存在“互选”关系。 第六章为结语,总结全文内容并指出本研究尚存在的一些不足之处。
[Abstract]:Based on the theories of semantics and type grammar, this paper discusses the distribution of willing verbs in legal style, and investigates the differences between legal style and novel style in the use of wishing verbs. In this paper, the author mainly discusses two types of structures of willing verbs in legal written style: "Vcw long preposition structure VP" and "Neg Vcw VP's". By using the theory of pattern grammar, this paper analyzes the reasons why the two types of structures are often used in legal style. We hope to make a comprehensive analysis of the usage of the willing verbs in legal style. This paper is divided into six chapters: the first chapter lays the groundwork for this study, including the research related to this topic, the purpose and significance of the topic, the definition of the research object, the source of the research materials and research methods. The second chapter first defines the definition and scope of the wishful verbs studied in this paper, discusses the grammatical functions of the wishing verbs, and then statistics the distribution of the willing verbs in the legal style on the basis of this. Then from the perspective of modal semantics and legal stylistic characteristics of the willing verbs, this paper analyzes the reasons for the two main differences: one is the reason why "ought" and "can" appear frequently in the legal written style; The other is the reason why different characters use different wishful verbs in the spoken language of the court. The third chapter discusses the main functions of the wishing verbs in the legal style. There are three main functions of the wishing verbs in the legal style: first, the wishing verbs can give power (rights), the second is to set the obligation of the wishing verbs; Third, willing verbs to express the position of discourse. The fourth chapter first compares the distribution of willing verbs in legal style with that in another typical written style (novel style): in legal style, there are fewer types and uneven distribution of wishing verbs than those in novel style, and the distribution of possible verbs in legal style is less than that in the novel style, and the distribution of the verbs in the legal style is less than that in the novel style. Secondly, there is a great difference between the high-frequency willing verbs and the sentence patterns that often co-occur between the two styles: the sentence patterns in the legal written style contain multiple prepositions, and the negative forms of the willing verbs are much more than those in the novel style. Finally, from the perspective of stylistic function, this paper analyzes the causes of the differences between the possible verbs in the two styles. The fifth chapter focuses on the analysis of two common sentence patterns in legal written style: "Vcw long-term preposition structure VP" and "Neg Vcw VP's", and classifies the two types of structures according to the semantic relationship and grammatical role of preposition structure and subsequent verbs respectively. Finally, the causes of the high frequency of the two types of structures are analyzed by using the theory of pattern grammar. The reason why the two structures appear in the high frequency of the legal written style is due to the "interselection" relationship between the willing verbs and the structure. The sixth chapter is the conclusion, summarizes the full text content and points out some shortcomings of this study.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146
本文编号：2437853
[Abstract]:Based on the theories of semantics and type grammar, this paper discusses the distribution of willing verbs in legal style, and investigates the differences between legal style and novel style in the use of wishing verbs. In this paper, the author mainly discusses two types of structures of willing verbs in legal written style: "Vcw long preposition structure VP" and "Neg Vcw VP's". By using the theory of pattern grammar, this paper analyzes the reasons why the two types of structures are often used in legal style. We hope to make a comprehensive analysis of the usage of the willing verbs in legal style. This paper is divided into six chapters: the first chapter lays the groundwork for this study, including the research related to this topic, the purpose and significance of the topic, the definition of the research object, the source of the research materials and research methods. The second chapter first defines the definition and scope of the wishful verbs studied in this paper, discusses the grammatical functions of the wishing verbs, and then statistics the distribution of the willing verbs in the legal style on the basis of this. Then from the perspective of modal semantics and legal stylistic characteristics of the willing verbs, this paper analyzes the reasons for the two main differences: one is the reason why "ought" and "can" appear frequently in the legal written style; The other is the reason why different characters use different wishful verbs in the spoken language of the court. The third chapter discusses the main functions of the wishing verbs in the legal style. There are three main functions of the wishing verbs in the legal style: first, the wishing verbs can give power (rights), the second is to set the obligation of the wishing verbs; Third, willing verbs to express the position of discourse. The fourth chapter first compares the distribution of willing verbs in legal style with that in another typical written style (novel style): in legal style, there are fewer types and uneven distribution of wishing verbs than those in novel style, and the distribution of possible verbs in legal style is less than that in the novel style, and the distribution of the verbs in the legal style is less than that in the novel style. Secondly, there is a great difference between the high-frequency willing verbs and the sentence patterns that often co-occur between the two styles: the sentence patterns in the legal written style contain multiple prepositions, and the negative forms of the willing verbs are much more than those in the novel style. Finally, from the perspective of stylistic function, this paper analyzes the causes of the differences between the possible verbs in the two styles. The fifth chapter focuses on the analysis of two common sentence patterns in legal written style: "Vcw long-term preposition structure VP" and "Neg Vcw VP's", and classifies the two types of structures according to the semantic relationship and grammatical role of preposition structure and subsequent verbs respectively. Finally, the causes of the high frequency of the two types of structures are analyzed by using the theory of pattern grammar. The reason why the two structures appear in the high frequency of the legal written style is due to the "interselection" relationship between the willing verbs and the structure. The sixth chapter is the conclusion, summarizes the full text content and points out some shortcomings of this study.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈炯;论立法语言的风格特征[J];毕节师范高等专科学校学报(综合版);2005年01期
2 李小川;情态动词否定之研究[J];常德师范学院学报(社会科学版);2003年02期
3 陶红印;试论语体分类的语法学意义[J];当代语言学;1999年03期
4 廖美珍;国外法律语言研究综述[J];当代语言学;2004年01期
5 王勇;;行走在语法和词汇之间——型式语法述评[J];当代语言学;2008年03期
6 潘庆云;;立法语言论略[J];淮北煤师院学报(社会科学版);1987年01期
7 陈炯;法律语体中常用词语的特点[J];汉语学习;1987年01期
8 吴战文;;浅谈能愿动词的语法功能[J];汉中师院学报(哲学社会科学版);1989年02期
9 林延君;谈能愿动词后的名词动化[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;1990年02期
10 张黎;;论刑事诉讼法中情态动词“可以”的主观性[J];考试周刊;2010年17期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 宋永圭;现代汉语情态动词“能”的否定研究[D];复旦大学;2004年
2 彭利贞;现代汉语情态研究[D];复旦大学;2005年
3 闵星雅;助动词“能”和“会”的认知研究[D];上海师范大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 曾艳;法律语言中情态动词的研究[D];浙江大学;2011年
，本文编号：2437853
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2437853.html
