博弈论关照下的矛盾修辞法认知析解
发布时间：2019-04-21 11:34
【摘要】：矛盾修辞法因其修辞效果突出而在语言运用中俯拾即是。本文首先论述了矛盾修辞法的认知属性，对支撑矛盾修辞法存在的哲学理据进行了深入探究，因为有了理据矛盾修辞法才有存在的理由。通过研究发现矛盾修辞法植根于体验哲学。由于人具有体验性，首先会对自身存在的各类矛盾进行不断的认知和体验，进而扩展到外部世界，，推广到语言运用上，为矛盾修辞法这样一种将矛盾语义并置，以产生矛盾、化解矛盾的方式达到修辞效果的修辞格的出现奠定了坚实的基础。 对矛盾修辞法的哲学理据探微之后，文章以全新的视角挖掘了矛盾修辞法的生成过程。由于矛盾修辞法独特而复杂的构成形式，一般对其生成过程的认知比较困难。本文在前人研究的基础上，提出了一个全新的认知矛盾修辞法的视角，那就是借助经济学领域的博弈论对这矛盾修辞法进行阐释和认知。运用博弈论模型大大简化了对矛盾修辞法生成过程的认知，其生成过程可拟构为三个步骤：1）局中人平衡对立：矛盾修辞法中的矛盾语义作为博弈的局中人保持初始状态的平衡对立；2）策略打破平衡：矛盾语义不能共存，必须进行博弈。语境是作为局中人的矛盾语义各自采用的策略，策略会有高下之分，所以语境会偏向一方，这样平衡就被打破了；3）形成效用最佳的固定支付函数：平衡被打破之后，矛盾语义分出了主次，它们各司其职，共同合作，产生了效果最佳的固定支付函数，这便是矛盾修辞法。博弈论中的局中人与矛盾修辞法中的矛盾语义有着极高的相似度，所以采用博弈论为研究矛盾修辞法的生成过程提供了新的突破点。 最后，本文总结归纳了矛盾修辞法的四类认知功能：语言警奇性、语义易解性、情感深邃性及哲理丰沛性。矛盾语义通过博弈达成协议，舍弃自我一部分利益维护整体的利益，从而达到矛盾修辞法整体效用的最佳化，这四类认知功能便是矛盾语义博弈后形成的效用最佳的支付函数的具体表现。
[Abstract]:Paradoxical rhetoric, because of its prominent rhetorical effect, is overlooking in the use of language. This paper first discusses the cognitive attributes of the contradictory rhetoric method, and probes into the philosophical justifications that support the existence of the contradictory rhetoric method, because there is a reason for the existence of the contradictory rhetoric method. Through the research, it is found that the contradictory rhetoric method is rooted in the experiential philosophy. Because of the experiential nature of human beings, first of all, they will continue to recognize and experience all kinds of contradictions that exist in themselves, and then expand to the outside world and extend to the use of language, so as to combine the semantic meaning of contradictions for the use of contradictory rhetoric, so as to produce contradictions. The emergence of rhetorical figures of speech through resolving contradictions has laid a solid foundation for the emergence of rhetorical figures of speech. After probing into the philosophical justifications of the rhetoric of contradiction, the paper excavates the process of the formation of the rhetoric of contradiction from a new angle of view. Because of the unique and complex forms of rhetoric, it is difficult to know the process of its formation. On the basis of previous studies, this paper puts forward a brand-new perspective of cognitive contradiction rhetoric, which is to interpret and recognize the contradiction rhetoric with the help of game theory in the field of economics. Using the game theory model, it greatly simplifies the cognition of the formation process of the contradictory rhetoric method. The process of its formation can be modeled as three steps: 1) the antinomy of human balance in the game: the antinomy in the rhetoric of contradiction as the equilibrium of the initial state of the player in the game; 2) the strategy breaks the balance: the contradictory semantics cannot coexist, must carry on the game. Context is the strategy adopted separately as the contradictory semantics of people in the bureau, so the context will be biased towards one side, so the balance will be broken; 3) form the fixed payment function with the best utility: after the balance is broken, the antinomy semantics is divided into primary and secondary, they each perform their duty, cooperate together, and produce the fixed payment function with the best effect, which is the contradiction rhetoric method. There is a high similarity between the contradiction semantics in the game theory and the contradiction rhetoric method in the game theory, so the game theory provides a new breakthrough for the study of the formation process of the contradiction rhetoric method. Finally, this paper summarizes four types of cognitive functions of contradictory rhetoric: linguistic alertness, semantic comprehensiveness, emotional depth and philosophical abundance. The antinomy reaches the agreement through the game, abandons the self part benefit to safeguard the whole benefit, thus achieves the contradiction rhetoric law overall utility optimizes. These four kinds of cognitive functions are the concrete manifestation of the utility optimal payment function formed after the contradictory semantic game.
【学位授予单位】：西安外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H05
本文编号：2462169
[Abstract]:Paradoxical rhetoric, because of its prominent rhetorical effect, is overlooking in the use of language. This paper first discusses the cognitive attributes of the contradictory rhetoric method, and probes into the philosophical justifications that support the existence of the contradictory rhetoric method, because there is a reason for the existence of the contradictory rhetoric method. Through the research, it is found that the contradictory rhetoric method is rooted in the experiential philosophy. Because of the experiential nature of human beings, first of all, they will continue to recognize and experience all kinds of contradictions that exist in themselves, and then expand to the outside world and extend to the use of language, so as to combine the semantic meaning of contradictions for the use of contradictory rhetoric, so as to produce contradictions. The emergence of rhetorical figures of speech through resolving contradictions has laid a solid foundation for the emergence of rhetorical figures of speech. After probing into the philosophical justifications of the rhetoric of contradiction, the paper excavates the process of the formation of the rhetoric of contradiction from a new angle of view. Because of the unique and complex forms of rhetoric, it is difficult to know the process of its formation. On the basis of previous studies, this paper puts forward a brand-new perspective of cognitive contradiction rhetoric, which is to interpret and recognize the contradiction rhetoric with the help of game theory in the field of economics. Using the game theory model, it greatly simplifies the cognition of the formation process of the contradictory rhetoric method. The process of its formation can be modeled as three steps: 1) the antinomy of human balance in the game: the antinomy in the rhetoric of contradiction as the equilibrium of the initial state of the player in the game; 2) the strategy breaks the balance: the contradictory semantics cannot coexist, must carry on the game. Context is the strategy adopted separately as the contradictory semantics of people in the bureau, so the context will be biased towards one side, so the balance will be broken; 3) form the fixed payment function with the best utility: after the balance is broken, the antinomy semantics is divided into primary and secondary, they each perform their duty, cooperate together, and produce the fixed payment function with the best effect, which is the contradiction rhetoric method. There is a high similarity between the contradiction semantics in the game theory and the contradiction rhetoric method in the game theory, so the game theory provides a new breakthrough for the study of the formation process of the contradiction rhetoric method. Finally, this paper summarizes four types of cognitive functions of contradictory rhetoric: linguistic alertness, semantic comprehensiveness, emotional depth and philosophical abundance. The antinomy reaches the agreement through the game, abandons the self part benefit to safeguard the whole benefit, thus achieves the contradiction rhetoric law overall utility optimizes. These four kinds of cognitive functions are the concrete manifestation of the utility optimal payment function formed after the contradictory semantic game.
【学位授予单位】：西安外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵耿林;;语言博弈现象漫谈[J];牡丹江教育学院学报;2007年06期
2 程平;;博弈论视域下的语言理解与语言理论分析[J];辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
3 孙毅;王晋秀;;汉英对比视界中矛盾修辞法的哲学底蕴疏议[J];外语研究;2012年02期
4 王金炳;;博弈论的发展历史和基本内容[J];时代经贸(下旬刊);2007年06期
5 任荣;;合作原则之博弈论新解[J];绍兴文理学院学报(哲学社会科学);2006年03期
6 刘瑞琴;英汉矛盾修饰法的比较与分析[J];石油大学学报(社会科学版);2002年03期
7 张晓蕾;;从Grice的会话含义理论角度看矛盾修辞法的使用[J];太原大学教育学院学报;2011年03期
8 王叔新;试论鲁迅作品的矛盾修辞及特点[J];台州学院学报;2005年01期
9 甄春亮;矛盾修辞法的翻译[J];天津外国语学院学报;1997年03期
10 李明菲;许之所;;语言博弈及会话策略的调整[J];武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版);2006年05期
本文编号：2462169
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2462169.html
