韩国语语尾“（？）”的认知分析及在汉语中的对应研究
发布时间：2019-05-17 07:08
【摘要】：韩国语语尾“(?)”通常被定义命名为“过去时制语尾”,同时又可以表示多种“体”的意义。这与汉语时体表达范畴迥然不同,因此给母语为汉语的韩语学习者带来了一定的学习困难,同时也成为了中韩互译的一个棘手问题。 因此,为了便于韩语学习者更加清晰明了地学习使用“(?)”,减少中韩互译中出现的问题,本文撇开以往直接将“(?)”定义为“过去时制语尾”而展开对比研究的传统思路,而是首先从认知语言学的理论层面对“(?)”使用过程中所表达的各种意义的产生理据以及相互问的关联性进行认知分析,然后再在此基础上对“(?)”在汉语中的对应关系进行研究,并通过所阐明的几种对应关系对前文所论述的关于“(?)”的认知分析结论和韩汉关于时间认知方式的差异等问题进行反面论证。本文共分为以下几章： 本文第一章介绍了研究目的、研究方法和步骤以及关于该领域的研究成果。 第二章对韩国语语尾“(?)”进行了认知分析。虽然国内外学术界关于韩国语语尾“(?)”的本体论研究和对比研究成果丰硕,但对于“(?)”的范畴划分及其意义表述上却至今未有一个统一而完整的论述。因此,本章通过搜集分析各类语法著作,对韩国语语尾“(?)”的意义进行梳理,然后利用认知语言学原型理论阐述了“(?)”的原型意义和其他意义。在通常情况下“(?)”被看作具有表达“未来完了”的特殊意义,然而本章利用时间-空间理论以及隐喻理论对其存在的合理性做出简要分析,最终对“(?)”的意义及其关联性进行分类总结。 第三章在前一章的基础上,对韩国文学作品《(?)》中的例句进行统计,论证了韩国语语尾“”(?)与汉语“了、着、过”等助词的对应关系的不典型性,同时也阐明了韩国语语尾“(?)”在汉语中的其他主要对应关系,最后从认知语言学以及传统语法形态论角度对韩中各种对应关系进行了阐释。 最后一章为结论,综合全文,提炼观点,对上述研究成果进行了综合阐析,并指出文中的不足之处及今后的努力方向。
[Abstract]:The end of Korean is "(?)" It is usually defined as the "end of the past tense" and can express the meaning of many kinds of "body" at the same time. This is very different from the category of Chinese tense and aspect expression, so it brings some learning difficulties to Korean learners whose mother tongue is Chinese, and at the same time, it has become a thorny problem in the translation between China and South Korea. Therefore, in order to facilitate Korean learners to learn to use "(?)" more clearly and to reduce the problems in the translation between China and South Korea, this paper puts aside the direct "(?)" in the past. The traditional idea of contrastive study is defined as "the end of the past tense", but first of all, from the theoretical level of cognitive linguistics, "(?)" The motivation of various meanings expressed in the process of use and the correlation between them are analyzed by cognitive analysis, and then the "(?)" is analyzed on this basis. The corresponding relationship in Chinese is studied, and the "(?)" discussed above is discussed through several corresponding relations expounded. This paper makes a negative argument between the conclusion of cognitive analysis and the difference of time cognitive style between Han and Han dynasties. This paper is divided into the following chapters: the first chapter introduces the research purpose, research methods and steps, as well as the research results in this field. The second chapter is about "(?)" at the end of the Korean language. Cognitive analysis was carried out. Although the academic circles at home and abroad about the end of Korean "(?)" There are many achievements in ontology research and contrastive research, but for "(?)" However, there is no unified and complete discussion on the category division and its meaning expression. Therefore, this chapter through the collection and analysis of all kinds of grammatical works, the end of the Korean "(?)" The meaning of "(?)" is combed, and then the "(?)" is expounded by using the archetypal theory of cognitive linguistics. The archetypal meaning and other meanings of. In general, "(?)" It is regarded as having the special significance of expressing "the future is over". However, this chapter makes a brief analysis of the rationality of its existence by using the theory of time-space and metaphor, and finally makes a brief analysis of "(?)" The significance and its relevance are classified and summarized. On the basis of the previous chapter, the third chapter makes statistics on the examples in Korean literary works "(?)", and demonstrates the end of Korean "(?) The untypicality of the corresponding relationship with the auxiliary words such as "Yi, Zi, Guo" in Chinese, and at the same time, it also clarifies the end of the Korean language "(?)". The other main corresponding relations in Chinese are explained from the perspective of cognitive linguistics and traditional grammatical morphology. finally, the corresponding relations between Korea and China are explained from the point of view of cognitive linguistics and traditional grammatical morphology. The last chapter is the conclusion, synthesizes the full text, abstracts the viewpoint, has carried on the comprehensive analysis to the above research achievement, and pointed out the insufficiency in this paper and the future effort direction.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H55;H146
本文编号：2478902
[Abstract]:The end of Korean is "(?)" It is usually defined as the "end of the past tense" and can express the meaning of many kinds of "body" at the same time. This is very different from the category of Chinese tense and aspect expression, so it brings some learning difficulties to Korean learners whose mother tongue is Chinese, and at the same time, it has become a thorny problem in the translation between China and South Korea. Therefore, in order to facilitate Korean learners to learn to use "(?)" more clearly and to reduce the problems in the translation between China and South Korea, this paper puts aside the direct "(?)" in the past. The traditional idea of contrastive study is defined as "the end of the past tense", but first of all, from the theoretical level of cognitive linguistics, "(?)" The motivation of various meanings expressed in the process of use and the correlation between them are analyzed by cognitive analysis, and then the "(?)" is analyzed on this basis. The corresponding relationship in Chinese is studied, and the "(?)" discussed above is discussed through several corresponding relations expounded. This paper makes a negative argument between the conclusion of cognitive analysis and the difference of time cognitive style between Han and Han dynasties. This paper is divided into the following chapters: the first chapter introduces the research purpose, research methods and steps, as well as the research results in this field. The second chapter is about "(?)" at the end of the Korean language. Cognitive analysis was carried out. Although the academic circles at home and abroad about the end of Korean "(?)" There are many achievements in ontology research and contrastive research, but for "(?)" However, there is no unified and complete discussion on the category division and its meaning expression. Therefore, this chapter through the collection and analysis of all kinds of grammatical works, the end of the Korean "(?)" The meaning of "(?)" is combed, and then the "(?)" is expounded by using the archetypal theory of cognitive linguistics. The archetypal meaning and other meanings of. In general, "(?)" It is regarded as having the special significance of expressing "the future is over". However, this chapter makes a brief analysis of the rationality of its existence by using the theory of time-space and metaphor, and finally makes a brief analysis of "(?)" The significance and its relevance are classified and summarized. On the basis of the previous chapter, the third chapter makes statistics on the examples in Korean literary works "(?)", and demonstrates the end of Korean "(?) The untypicality of the corresponding relationship with the auxiliary words such as "Yi, Zi, Guo" in Chinese, and at the same time, it also clarifies the end of the Korean language "(?)". The other main corresponding relations in Chinese are explained from the perspective of cognitive linguistics and traditional grammatical morphology. finally, the corresponding relations between Korea and China are explained from the point of view of cognitive linguistics and traditional grammatical morphology. The last chapter is the conclusion, synthesizes the full text, abstracts the viewpoint, has carried on the comprehensive analysis to the above research achievement, and pointed out the insufficiency in this paper and the future effort direction.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H55;H146
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 李瑜;;论过去时态的实质及其产生的理据[J];湖南第一师范学院学报;2010年03期
2 陈传显;;国内认知语言学研究方法:调查与分析[J];海南广播电视大学学报;2012年01期
3 郑亚南;黄齐东;;对比语言学研究法综论[J];南京社会科学;2008年12期
4 张凤娟;原型范畴理论与英语时态范畴化的认知研究[J];天津外国语学院学报;2003年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王彤;俄、汉语时间范畴多视角对比研究[D];黑龙江大学;2005年
，本文编号：2478902
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2478902.html
