汉语会话冲突的消解机制研究
发布时间:2019-05-17 08:13
【摘要】:汉语会话冲突造成说话人和听话人交流受阻,是一种常见的语言现象。它不同于话语冲突或冲突话语,主要通过语音、语法、语义、语用以及修辞等途径表现出来,具有语境依赖性、动态性和意图违背性的特点。针对这一语言现象,运用描写、归纳的方法考察语境因素、预设因素和关联因素如何消解会话冲突。这三种消解方法互不相同:语境中的背景语境和场景语境符合会话冲突动态性的特点,具有限制和选择信息的功能;预设消解通过话语中出现的新预设调节和约束语言信息;而关联中的架桥理论使得听话人运用逻辑知识推导出话语间的缺损项,挖掘出说话人的话语含义,消除疑虑。同时三种方法也具有内在的联系性。由于引起汉语会话冲突的原因众多,其消解方法不能局限于几种,其他的方法将会在以后继续探讨。研究汉语会话冲突的消解机制能够为探索相关语言现象提供依据,,有助于交际参与者交换话语信息,促成交际顺利完成。
[Abstract]:It is a common language phenomenon that the communication between the speaker and the hearer is blocked by the conflict of Chinese conversation. It is different from discourse conflict or conflict discourse, mainly through phonetics, grammar, semantics, pragmatics and rhetoric, and has the characteristics of context dependence, dynamics and intention violation. In view of this linguistic phenomenon, this paper uses the method of description and induction to investigate how contextual factors, presupposition factors and related factors resolve the conversation conflict. The three resolution methods are different: the background context and the scene context in the context accord with the dynamic characteristics of the conversation conflict and have the function of restricting and selecting the information, and the presupposition resolution adjusts and restricts the language information through the new presupposition in the discourse, and the background context and the scene context in the context accord with the dynamic characteristics of the conversation conflict. The bridge-building theory in relevance makes the hearer use logical knowledge to deduce the defects between utterances, excavate the meaning of the speaker's discourse, and eliminate the doubts. At the same time, the three methods also have inherent connection. Due to the many causes of Chinese conversation conflict, its resolution methods can not be limited to a few, other methods will continue to be discussed in the future. The study of the resolution mechanism of Chinese conversation conflict can provide the basis for exploring the related language phenomena, help the communicative participants to exchange discourse information, and promote the smooth completion of communication.
【学位授予单位】:渤海大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H136
本文编号:2478935
[Abstract]:It is a common language phenomenon that the communication between the speaker and the hearer is blocked by the conflict of Chinese conversation. It is different from discourse conflict or conflict discourse, mainly through phonetics, grammar, semantics, pragmatics and rhetoric, and has the characteristics of context dependence, dynamics and intention violation. In view of this linguistic phenomenon, this paper uses the method of description and induction to investigate how contextual factors, presupposition factors and related factors resolve the conversation conflict. The three resolution methods are different: the background context and the scene context in the context accord with the dynamic characteristics of the conversation conflict and have the function of restricting and selecting the information, and the presupposition resolution adjusts and restricts the language information through the new presupposition in the discourse, and the background context and the scene context in the context accord with the dynamic characteristics of the conversation conflict. The bridge-building theory in relevance makes the hearer use logical knowledge to deduce the defects between utterances, excavate the meaning of the speaker's discourse, and eliminate the doubts. At the same time, the three methods also have inherent connection. Due to the many causes of Chinese conversation conflict, its resolution methods can not be limited to a few, other methods will continue to be discussed in the future. The study of the resolution mechanism of Chinese conversation conflict can provide the basis for exploring the related language phenomena, help the communicative participants to exchange discourse information, and promote the smooth completion of communication.
【学位授予单位】:渤海大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H136
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周彦军;何春霞;;小说冲突话语分析[J];长沙大学学报;2009年03期
2 陈忠华;韩红;;话语的语境性[J];解放军外语学院学报;1997年01期
3 文旭;中国语用学20年[J];解放军外国语学院学报;1999年04期
4 束定芳;;关于预设理论的几个问题[J];外语研究;1989年03期
5 蓝纯;认知语言学:背景与现状[J];外语研究;2001年03期
6 李锡胤;对于预设与推涵的思考[J];外语学刊(黑龙江大学学报);1990年03期
7 徐盛桓;“预设”新论[J];外语学刊(黑龙江大学学报);1993年01期
8 赵英玲;冲突话语分析[J];外语学刊;2004年05期
9 万斌;王满荣;;论冲突与和谐[J];求索;2006年08期
10 徐家祯;;浅论“前提”及影响“前提”的因素[J];逻辑与语言学习;1986年01期
本文编号:2478935
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2478935.html