基于言语行为理论的“禁止”与“允许”研究
发布时间：2019-05-30 01:06
【摘要】：在语用学言语行为理论、礼貌原则和面子理论的基础上,结合社会语言学本文以禁止和允许行为作为研究对象,进行跨文化、跨性别的研究。言语行为理论、礼貌原则和面子理论是语用学的重要理论基础。禁止与允许是请求行动的两种结果。禁止导致请求被拒绝；允许表明请求可被接受。在日常生活中,请求行动是基本的行为活动之一。针对请求的语用学研究也日渐增多,特别是从性别对比、文化对比角度进行请求行为的研究不断增加。本文通过对不同性别、中英两种文化进行对比研究,探讨中英文化间男女性别在使用禁止和允许行为时所产生的差异。 本文通过调查问卷的形式来进行数据收集。根据语篇补全测试(DCT),本次调查问卷共设计了7个场景。针对120名中外师生进行了调查,被调查者中,男女比例相同,中外师生比例相同。根据本文的研究,较于男性被调查者,女性被调查者更加礼貌,并多采用间接请求策略来禁止或允许某项行为。这源于男女在社会上的不同地位,受到不同文化因素影响的原因。较于外国师生,中国师生更倾向于采用间接请求策略来禁止或允许某项行为。 从文化的角度出发,造成这种差异性的原因在于：中国社会传统文化是以群,集体的观念压抑个体意识,注重群体合作和个人谦虚,更加强调社会距离与社会层级的不同；而西方则更加强调平等和自由。中国社会强调团队意识,这与西方社会重视个体作用有所不同。在思维方式上,中国文化强调委婉的圆式思维方式；而西方文化则强调直接的线性思维方式。此外,在性别差异上,由于男、女在生理需求、社会需求和心倾向上较为不同,女性对社会地位、社会距离变化的感知较男性更加敏感。因此,在采用允许和禁止策略时,女性较男性更加委婉。 本文希望通过研究,能够有助于对禁止和允许行为进行更加深入和彻底地研究。
[Abstract]:On the basis of pragmatic speech act theory, politeness principle and face theory, combined with sociolinguistics, this paper takes prohibited and permissible behavior as the research object, and makes a cross-cultural and transgender study. Speech act theory, politeness principle and face theory are the important theoretical basis of pragmatics. Prohibition and permission are the two results of requesting action. Prohibition causes the request to be rejected; permission to indicate that the request is acceptable. In daily life, asking for action is one of the basic behavioral activities. There are more and more pragmatic studies on requests, especially from the perspective of gender contrast and cultural contrast. Based on a comparative study of different genders and Chinese and English cultures, this paper discusses the differences between Chinese and British cultures in the use of prohibited and permissible behaviors. In this paper, data collection is carried out in the form of questionnaire. According to the text completion test (DCT), questionnaire, a total of seven scenes were designed. 120 Chinese and foreign teachers and students were investigated. Among the respondents, the ratio of male to female was the same, and the ratio of Chinese and foreign teachers and students was the same. According to this study, compared with male respondents, female respondents are more polite and use indirect request strategy to prohibit or allow a certain behavior. This stems from the different status of men and women in society and the influence of different cultural factors. Compared with foreign teachers and students, Chinese teachers and students prefer to use indirect request strategy to prohibit or allow a certain behavior. From the cultural point of view, the reasons for this difference lie in: the traditional culture of Chinese society oppresses individual consciousness with the concept of group and collective, pays attention to group cooperation and individual modesty, and emphasizes the difference between social distance and social level; The West, on the other hand, places greater emphasis on equality and freedom. Chinese society emphasizes team consciousness, which is different from the emphasis on individual role in western society. In terms of mode of thinking, Chinese culture emphasizes euphemistic round mode of thinking, while western culture emphasizes direct linear mode of thinking. In addition, in terms of gender differences, because men and women are different in physical needs, social needs and psychological tendencies, women are more sensitive to changes in social status and social distance than men. As a result, women are more euphemistic than men in adopting permissible and prohibited strategies. This paper hopes that through the study, it can contribute to a more in-depth and thorough study of prohibited and permissible behavior.
【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H313;H136
本文编号：2488380
[Abstract]:On the basis of pragmatic speech act theory, politeness principle and face theory, combined with sociolinguistics, this paper takes prohibited and permissible behavior as the research object, and makes a cross-cultural and transgender study. Speech act theory, politeness principle and face theory are the important theoretical basis of pragmatics. Prohibition and permission are the two results of requesting action. Prohibition causes the request to be rejected; permission to indicate that the request is acceptable. In daily life, asking for action is one of the basic behavioral activities. There are more and more pragmatic studies on requests, especially from the perspective of gender contrast and cultural contrast. Based on a comparative study of different genders and Chinese and English cultures, this paper discusses the differences between Chinese and British cultures in the use of prohibited and permissible behaviors. In this paper, data collection is carried out in the form of questionnaire. According to the text completion test (DCT), questionnaire, a total of seven scenes were designed. 120 Chinese and foreign teachers and students were investigated. Among the respondents, the ratio of male to female was the same, and the ratio of Chinese and foreign teachers and students was the same. According to this study, compared with male respondents, female respondents are more polite and use indirect request strategy to prohibit or allow a certain behavior. This stems from the different status of men and women in society and the influence of different cultural factors. Compared with foreign teachers and students, Chinese teachers and students prefer to use indirect request strategy to prohibit or allow a certain behavior. From the cultural point of view, the reasons for this difference lie in: the traditional culture of Chinese society oppresses individual consciousness with the concept of group and collective, pays attention to group cooperation and individual modesty, and emphasizes the difference between social distance and social level; The West, on the other hand, places greater emphasis on equality and freedom. Chinese society emphasizes team consciousness, which is different from the emphasis on individual role in western society. In terms of mode of thinking, Chinese culture emphasizes euphemistic round mode of thinking, while western culture emphasizes direct linear mode of thinking. In addition, in terms of gender differences, because men and women are different in physical needs, social needs and psychological tendencies, women are more sensitive to changes in social status and social distance than men. As a result, women are more euphemistic than men in adopting permissible and prohibited strategies. This paper hopes that through the study, it can contribute to a more in-depth and thorough study of prohibited and permissible behavior.
【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H313;H136
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 胡壮麟;语言的可证性[J];外语教学与研究;1994年01期
2 曲卫国,陈流芳;论传统的中国礼貌原则[J];学术月刊;1999年07期
，本文编号：2488380
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2488380.html
