泰国学生“不”、“没有”和“别”的习得偏误研究
[Abstract]:"No", "no" and "Bei" are commonly used negative adverbs in modern Chinese. The negative structure of Chinese composed of them is more complex. There are no adverbs corresponding to these three in Thai, but the negative adverbs "(?)" are commonly used in Thai. The usage of "no", "no" and "other" is almost covered by the usage of "no", "no" and "other". The incomplete correspondence between negative adverbs in Chinese and Thai makes Thai learners often confuse the use of "no", "no" and "other", that is to say, the phenomenon of missubstitution. With "(?)" The negative structure formed by the mark is relatively single in form, which contains almost all the negative expressions in Thai, which further increases the difficulty for Thai students to learn Chinese negative adverbs. In this paper, the negative adverb "(?)" is commonly used in Thai. With the Chinese "no", "no" and "other" as the research objects, combined with the comparison of Chinese and Thai languages, through a series of research methods from semantic and grammatical aspects, the corpus was collected in the form of a questionnaire survey in Li Fu Middle School, Thailand. The results of quantitative statistical survey and qualitative analysis are carried out to scientifically analyze and summarize the acquisition order, misgeneration and causes of Thai students' learning "no", "no" and "different", and then put forward effective teaching countermeasures. The full text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter expounds the significance of this topic, summarizes some related research on the research object at home and abroad, and introduces some methods used to carry out this survey. The second chapter analyzes the usage and semantics of the Chinese negative adverbs "no", "no" and "other", as well as the meaning of "(?)" in Thai. The usage and semantics of several commonly used negative adverbs represented by the third chapter are compared and analyzed from the aspects of negative structure form, semantic features and position in sentences, and "no", "no" and "(?)" in Thai. The similarities and differences between the negative adverbs of the subject and the son; In the fourth chapter, the process of questionnaire survey is briefly described, the survey results are counted, and the quantitative and qualitative analysis are carried out, and the types of acquisition errors of Thai students "no", "no" and "other" and their causes are pointed out. The author believes that in terms of the factors of teaching activities, the teachers who play a leading role and the students in the main position will cause the above errors, and as some teaching materials, the syllabus will also affect the students'"no" and "no". "Don't" and "(?)" In terms of language, the difficulty of Chinese itself, the generalization of its simple rules by Thai students and the negative transfer of Thai will lead to misgeneration. Using contrastive analysis to refine the rules of Chinese in order to give full play to the positive transfer role of Thai students' mother tongue and scene simulation can reduce the acquisition errors of Thai students'"no", "no" and "other". At the end of the paper, the defects of this paper and the places that need to be further studied are pointed out, and the prospect of Chinese teaching in Thailand is put forward.
【学位授予单位】:陕西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:H195
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 沙宗元;;课外语言环境对留学生汉语习得的作用和影响[J];合肥师范学院学报;2009年04期
2 朱明霞;;浅谈汉语学习中的情感因素[J];安徽文学(下半月);2010年04期
3 柳清;;对外汉语教学中的偏误分类及教学策略[J];安徽文学(下半月);2012年04期
4 胡月宝;;新加坡小一儿童汉语拼音偏误调查研究[J];北华大学学报(社会科学版);2010年05期
5 陈光友;;新疆中亚留学生汉字偏误调查分析[J];北方文学(下半月);2011年09期
6 黄一;;试论第二语言习得理论主要流派及其观点[J];北方文学(下半月);2011年10期
7 周玉珊;;浅议中文信息处理技术在外汉语教学中的运用[J];北方文学(下半月);2011年11期
8 高玉敏;卢冀峰;;语法教学对第二语言习得的影响综述[J];才智;2010年04期
9 吴春相;余瑞雪;;“不/没+VP”的时间意义[J];长春师范学院学报(人文社会科学版);2008年07期
10 付博;;初级汉语水平留学生听课的影响因素研究[J];长春师范学院学报;2012年01期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 林建平;方姣婷;;游走于|捣窖杂肫胀▕q之晸:起始阶段语音习得的几个特征[A];第九届中国语音学学术会议论文集[C];2010年
2 闻亭;;华裔与非华裔汉语学习者对待目的语群体态度及习得动机比较研究[A];第五届全国语言文字应用学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
3 郝敏;;现代汉语“不+NP”结构分析[A];江西省语言学会2008年年会论文集[C];2008年
4 张小翠;;对外汉语偏误分析综述[A];江西省语言学会2009年年会论文集[C];2009年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 王欣;汉日否定表达对比研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
2 辛宏伟;3-6岁维吾尔族儿童汉语语言发展研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
3 朴宣姝;学前对韩汉语教学研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
4 胡氏贞英;汉语非文学文本越译研究[D];华中师范大学;2011年
5 罗芳;西藏农牧区小学汉语教学研究[D];华中师范大学;2011年
6 李菡幽;基于学习策略的汉语作为第二语言语法偏误研究[D];福建师范大学;2011年
7 王洪明;俄汉阐释动词词义的元语言释义对比[D];黑龙江大学;2011年
8 黄晓颖;对外汉语有效教学研究[D];东北师范大学;2011年
9 周洪学;湖南安仁方言语法研究[D];华中师范大学;2012年
10 文贞惠;现代汉语否定范畴研究[D];复旦大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 肖艳;中高级阶段越南学生汉语常用篇章衔接手段偏误分析[D];广西民族大学;2010年
2 唐文成;越南学生汉语“是……的”句式的习得研究[D];广西民族大学;2010年
3 王宣予;中高级阶段越南留学生汉语“得”字补语句习得研究[D];广西民族大学;2010年
4 张文莲;韩国留学生“比”字句教学策略研究[D];东北师范大学;2010年
5 武晓琴;汉语作为第二语言教学中的表已然义“是……的”句研究[D];福建师范大学;2010年
6 刘瑜;对外汉语教学中汉字认读层次教学法研究[D];湖北工业大学;2011年
7 阮氏练;越南留学生“比”字句偏误分析[D];吉林大学;2011年
8 刘育雁;时间连接成分“然后、以后、后来”的篇章功能与习得情况考察[D];吉林大学;2011年
9 潘氏玄庄;对越初级汉语听力课教学策略研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
10 陈春燕;对外汉语教学助词“了”的选项与排序研究[D];暨南大学;2011年
,本文编号:2493191
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2493191.html