韩汉全称量化副词“(?)”和“都”的对比研究
发布时间:2019-06-10 05:39
【摘要】:本文的研究目的是使韩中语言学习者对“(?)”和“都”有更深刻的理解。为此本文主要针对全称量化副词“(?)”和“都”的语义、句法特征及语义扩张进行分析和对比。在语义方面,得出了“(?)”和“都”虽都具有“强调”义、“分散”义和“集合”义,但是“(?)”的“集合义”比“都”更强,“都”的“分散义”比“”更强的结论。在句法方面,得出了如下结论,第一,“(?)”常出现在量化对象之后,但“都”却在其前和其后都可出现;第二,,“都”对时间进行量化的倾向性比“(?)”强;第三,“都”在任意成分后出现的倾向性比“(?)”强;第四,“都”与否定表达的位置关系决定了句子表达的是全部否定或部分否定的意义,而“(?)”与否定表达的位置关系却不会对句意产生影响。在对“(?)”和“都”的语义扩张进行对比时,主要分为两部分,即从对有标记的量化对象进行全称量化的语义开始的语义扩张和从对无标记的量化对象进行全称量化的语义开始的语义扩张。在分析语义扩张过程时,本文主要利用了“重新分析”、“语用推理”等机制以及“语义和谐律”和“连续性环境”等原理,对“(?)”和“都”在语义扩张过程中的各个义项及产生这些义项的过程进行了分析,总结出了“(?)”和“都”的不同的语义扩张模式,并将其语义扩张与Traugott提出的主观化的“语义-语用倾向”和Heine提出的“语义扩张方向”进行了对照,另外也阐明了“(?)”和“都”在语义扩张过程中的相同点和不同点。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this study is to make Korean and Chinese language learners respond to "(?)" And "du" have a deeper understanding. Therefore, this paper mainly aims at the full name quantitative adverb "(?)". The semantic, syntactic features and semantic expansion of du are analyzed and compared. In terms of semantics, "(?)" is obtained. Although both "du" have "emphasis" meaning, "scattered" meaning and "set" meaning, but "(?)" The "collective meaning" is stronger than the "du", and the "decentralized meaning" of the "du" is stronger than the "conclusion". In terms of syntax, the following conclusions are drawn: first, "(?)" It often appears after the quantitative object, but "du" can appear before and after it; second, the tendency ratio of "du" to quantify time "(?)" Strong; third, the tendency of "du" after any component is greater than that of "(?)". Fourth, the position relationship between "du" and negative expression determines that the sentence expresses the meaning of all negation or partial negation, while "(?)" However, the position relationship with negative expression does not have an impact on the meaning of the sentence. In the "(?)" Compared with the semantic expansion of "du", it is mainly divided into two parts. That is, the semantic expansion begins with the full name quantification semantics of the marked quantitative objects and the semantic expansion from the full name quantification semantics of the unmarked quantitative objects. In analyzing the process of semantic expansion, this paper mainly makes use of the mechanisms of "reanalysis", "pragmatic reasoning", as well as the principles of "semantic harmony law" and "continuous environment". And "du" in the process of semantic expansion and the process of producing these meanings are analyzed, and summed up "(?)" The semantic extension pattern is different from that of "du", and its semantic extension is compared with the subjective "semantic-pragmatic tendency" proposed by Traugott and the "direction of semantic expansion" proposed by Heine. In addition, it also clarifies the "(?)" The similarities and differences between du and du in the process of semantic expansion.
【学位授予单位】:上海外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H146.2;H55
本文编号:2496218
[Abstract]:The purpose of this study is to make Korean and Chinese language learners respond to "(?)" And "du" have a deeper understanding. Therefore, this paper mainly aims at the full name quantitative adverb "(?)". The semantic, syntactic features and semantic expansion of du are analyzed and compared. In terms of semantics, "(?)" is obtained. Although both "du" have "emphasis" meaning, "scattered" meaning and "set" meaning, but "(?)" The "collective meaning" is stronger than the "du", and the "decentralized meaning" of the "du" is stronger than the "conclusion". In terms of syntax, the following conclusions are drawn: first, "(?)" It often appears after the quantitative object, but "du" can appear before and after it; second, the tendency ratio of "du" to quantify time "(?)" Strong; third, the tendency of "du" after any component is greater than that of "(?)". Fourth, the position relationship between "du" and negative expression determines that the sentence expresses the meaning of all negation or partial negation, while "(?)" However, the position relationship with negative expression does not have an impact on the meaning of the sentence. In the "(?)" Compared with the semantic expansion of "du", it is mainly divided into two parts. That is, the semantic expansion begins with the full name quantification semantics of the marked quantitative objects and the semantic expansion from the full name quantification semantics of the unmarked quantitative objects. In analyzing the process of semantic expansion, this paper mainly makes use of the mechanisms of "reanalysis", "pragmatic reasoning", as well as the principles of "semantic harmony law" and "continuous environment". And "du" in the process of semantic expansion and the process of producing these meanings are analyzed, and summed up "(?)" The semantic extension pattern is different from that of "du", and its semantic extension is compared with the subjective "semantic-pragmatic tendency" proposed by Traugott and the "direction of semantic expansion" proposed by Heine. In addition, it also clarifies the "(?)" The similarities and differences between du and du in the process of semantic expansion.
【学位授予单位】:上海外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H146.2;H55
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 袁毓林;;“都”的加合性语义功能及其分配性效应[J];当代语言学;2005年04期
2 李得春,金基石;关于朝鲜语词汇发展中的若干问题[J];东疆学刊;2002年04期
3 武振玉;试论副词“全”的产生与发展[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2005年03期
4 高顺全;;“都”、“也”、“又”主观化用法的异同[J];淮海工学院学报(社会科学版);2009年02期
5 李宝伦;张蕾;潘海华;;汉语全称量化副词/分配算子的共现和语义分工——以“都”“各”“全”的共现为例[J];汉语学报;2009年03期
6 马真;关于“都/全”所总括的对象的位置[J];汉语学习;1983年01期
7 徐杰;“都”类副词的总括对象及其隐现、位序[J];汉语学习;1985年01期
8 史锡尧;副词“都”语义语用综合考察[J];汉语学习;1990年04期
9 王红;副词“都”的语法意义试析[J];汉语学习;1999年06期
10 周小兵;王宇;;与范围副词“都”有关的偏误分析[J];汉语学习;2007年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 吴闲荣;关于汉语副词“都”的研究[D];复旦大学;2011年
本文编号:2496218
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2496218.html