论价值语言

发布时间：2019-07-10 10:53

【摘要】：语言有描述语言和价值语言之分。虽然在纯粹的描述语言和纯粹的价值语言之间也存在兼有描述和价值二重性的混合语言,但这并不能作为没有描述语言与价值语言之分野的依据。价值语言有两种功能,一是评价对象,一是指令人。价值语言的类型有评价语言与指令语言、自然价值语言与人工价值语言、肯定性价值语言与否定性价值语言、原生价值语言与派生价值语言之分。价值语言内部还存在四个级别的差异,它们相互之间存在统摄与被统摄的关系,并由此形成一个有内在逻辑关联的有机系统。价值语言在性质上似乎与以真假为值的传统语言逻辑不相容,但实际上,价值语言也一直遵守的是传统语言逻辑。如果我们将传统语言逻辑所注重的真假值改为对错值,那么,传统逻辑就既可在实际上与价值语言相容,也可在名义上和性质上与价值语言相容。
[Abstract]:The language is divided into the description language and the value language. Although a mixed language with both the description and the value duality exists between the pure description language and the pure value language, this cannot be used as the basis for the division of the description language and the value language. The value language has two functions, one is to evaluate the object, one is the instruction person. The types of the value language are the evaluation language and the instruction language, the natural value language and the artificial value language, the positive value language and the negative value language, the native value language and the derived value language. There are four levels of difference in the value language, which exist in the relationship between the unity and the co-operation of each other, and form an organic system with intrinsic logic. The value language seems to be incompatible with the traditional language logic with the true or false value, but in fact, the value language has always followed the traditional language logic. If we change the true or false value of the traditional language logic to the wrong value, the traditional logic can be compatible with the value language in fact and be compatible with the value language in the name and in nature.
【作者单位】：华中科技大学人文学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学一般项目“人本价值哲学——以元价值为逻辑起点”(编号:09YJA20010)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：H0

【参考文献】