“X是X”赘言构式的顺应—关联考察
发布时间:2021-01-06 21:01
“x是x”这一赘言结构是言语交际中非常有趣的语言现象,很早就引起了语法学家和修辞学家的注意。作为一个颇有争议的话题,“x是x”一直以来都受到各个领域(如修辞、逻辑、哲学甚至语言学领域)的广泛关注。不同学科领域中的学者纷纷对其做出了分析研究,其中句法学,语义学,语用学等领域取得了一定的研究成果,虽然如此,但还没有哪个流派同时从说话人和听话人的角度对该现象作出令人满意的阐释。同语“x是x”使用的本质过程还有待于进一步探索。在汲取Sperber & Wilson的关联理论和Verschueren的顺应理论优点的基础上,语言学家冉永平(2004)提出了顺应-关联模式。此模式以其强大的解释力和描述力被用来阐释多种语言现象。本文尝试性运用该模式探讨日常话语交际中的同语现象,并根据分析结果提出同语话语交际模式。旨在更深入地探索同语“x是x”生成和理解的本质过程,为同语的研究提供一个新颖的视角。本文首次从顺应关联的角度对话语交际中同语“x是x”的生成和理解进行详细地阐述,并提出同语话语交际模式。通过大量同语实例地定性定量分析,充分展示了它的使用过程是一个顺应语境因素为实现最佳关联而不断做出语言...
【文章来源】:四川外国语大学重庆市
【文章页数】:86 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Introduction of “X be X”
1.2 Motivations of the Study
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.4 Methodology and Data Collection
1.5 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Foreign Scholars’Studies of “X be X”
2.1.1 Radical Pragmatic Analysis
2.1.2 Radical Semantic Analysis
2.1.3 A Less Radical Account
2.1.4 Comments
2.2.D omestic Scholars’Studies of “X be X”
2.2.1 A Rhetorical Approach
2.2.2 A Syntactic Approach
2.2.2.1 The Property of “X”and “Be”
2.2.2.2 Act as Component of Sentence
2.2.2.3 Monomial Type and Multinomial Type of “X be X”
2.2.2.4 Expansion of “X be X”Format
2.2.3 A Semantic Approach
2.2.4 A Pragmatic Approach
2.2.5 A Cognitive Approach
2.2.6 Comments
2.3 Achievements and Limitations of the Previous Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 The Foundation of the Adaptation-Relevance Model
3.1.1 Introduction of Relevance Theory
3.1.1.1 Ostension and Inference
3.1.1.2 Contextual Effects
3.1.1.3 Two Principles of Relevance
3.1.1.4 Optimal Relevance
3.1.1.5 Relevance Theory and Interpretation of “X be X”
3.1.2 Introduction of Adaptation Theory
3.1.2.1 Making Choices
3.1.2.2 Three Properties of Language
3.1.2.3 Four Angles of Investigation
3.1.2.4 Adaptation Theory and Interpretation of “X be X”
3.2 The Framework of the Adaptation-Relevance Model
3.2.1 Language Use as a Process of Relevance-orientation
3.2.2 Language Use as a Process of Choice-making Based on Relevance
3.2.3 Language Use as a Process of Participation of Contextual Presumption
3.2.4 Language Use as a Process of Dynamic Adaptation
3.2.5 Language Use as a Process of Strategy-choosing
3.3 Summary
Chapter Four The Adaptation-Relevance Approach to Tautology “X be X”
4.1 Analysis of “X be X”Step by Step by A-R Model
4.1.1 “X be X”Use as a Process of Relevance-orientation
4.1.2 “X be X”Use as a Process of Choice-making Based on Relevance
4.1.3 “X be X”Use as a Process of Participation of Contextual Presumption
4.1.4 “X be X”Use as a Process of Adaptation
4.1.4.1 The Adaptation to the Mental World
4.1.4.2 The Adaptation to the Social World
4.1.4.3 The Adaptation to the Physical World
4.1.5 “X be X”Use as a Process of Strategy-choosing
4.1.5.1 Intended Vagueness
4.1.5.2 Highlight
4.1.5.3 Concession
4.1.5.4 Praise or Criticism
4.1.5.5 Tolerance
4.2 Whole Analysis on Classical “X be X”Cases Under A-R Model
4.3 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusions
5.1 Major Findings
5.2 Limitations
5.3 Suggestions for Further Research
References
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]赘言“A是A”的认知语用研究[J]. 吴丽丽. 安阳师范学院学报. 2008(03)
[2]名词性同语含意的认知推理[J]. 任培红. 三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版). 2008(03)
[3]同义反复话语的认知阐释[J]. 章汉清. 淮南师范学院学报. 2008(03)
[4]“A是A”和“A是A,B是B”[J]. 孟晓慧. 泰安教育学院学报岱宗学刊. 2007(03)
[5]对“同语”辞格的重新界说[J]. 罗毅. 怀化学院学报. 2006(07)
[6]“X是X”句式的语义分析[J]. 赵家新. 现代语文. 2006(05)
[7]浅谈同义反复辞格[J]. 马彪. 求是学刊. 2005(06)
[8]多级二步明示推理及其泛式[J]. 廖巧云,侯国金. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2005(05)
[9]“非理想”的语言事实在理论建设中的地位与作用——“同义反复”的非范畴化理论解释[J]. 刘正光. 现代外语. 2005(02)
[10]析“N是N”结构[J]. 高文利,杨小卫. 三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版). 2005(02)
硕士论文
[1]“X是X”结构的多维考察[D]. 赵晓伟.南昌大学 2007
[2]现代汉语同语判断式及其相关格式研究[D]. 朱敏.上海师范大学 2005
本文编号:2961253
【文章来源】:四川外国语大学重庆市
【文章页数】:86 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Introduction of “X be X”
1.2 Motivations of the Study
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.4 Methodology and Data Collection
1.5 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Foreign Scholars’Studies of “X be X”
2.1.1 Radical Pragmatic Analysis
2.1.2 Radical Semantic Analysis
2.1.3 A Less Radical Account
2.1.4 Comments
2.2.D omestic Scholars’Studies of “X be X”
2.2.1 A Rhetorical Approach
2.2.2 A Syntactic Approach
2.2.2.1 The Property of “X”and “Be”
2.2.2.2 Act as Component of Sentence
2.2.2.3 Monomial Type and Multinomial Type of “X be X”
2.2.2.4 Expansion of “X be X”Format
2.2.3 A Semantic Approach
2.2.4 A Pragmatic Approach
2.2.5 A Cognitive Approach
2.2.6 Comments
2.3 Achievements and Limitations of the Previous Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 The Foundation of the Adaptation-Relevance Model
3.1.1 Introduction of Relevance Theory
3.1.1.1 Ostension and Inference
3.1.1.2 Contextual Effects
3.1.1.3 Two Principles of Relevance
3.1.1.4 Optimal Relevance
3.1.1.5 Relevance Theory and Interpretation of “X be X”
3.1.2 Introduction of Adaptation Theory
3.1.2.1 Making Choices
3.1.2.2 Three Properties of Language
3.1.2.3 Four Angles of Investigation
3.1.2.4 Adaptation Theory and Interpretation of “X be X”
3.2 The Framework of the Adaptation-Relevance Model
3.2.1 Language Use as a Process of Relevance-orientation
3.2.2 Language Use as a Process of Choice-making Based on Relevance
3.2.3 Language Use as a Process of Participation of Contextual Presumption
3.2.4 Language Use as a Process of Dynamic Adaptation
3.2.5 Language Use as a Process of Strategy-choosing
3.3 Summary
Chapter Four The Adaptation-Relevance Approach to Tautology “X be X”
4.1 Analysis of “X be X”Step by Step by A-R Model
4.1.1 “X be X”Use as a Process of Relevance-orientation
4.1.2 “X be X”Use as a Process of Choice-making Based on Relevance
4.1.3 “X be X”Use as a Process of Participation of Contextual Presumption
4.1.4 “X be X”Use as a Process of Adaptation
4.1.4.1 The Adaptation to the Mental World
4.1.4.2 The Adaptation to the Social World
4.1.4.3 The Adaptation to the Physical World
4.1.5 “X be X”Use as a Process of Strategy-choosing
4.1.5.1 Intended Vagueness
4.1.5.2 Highlight
4.1.5.3 Concession
4.1.5.4 Praise or Criticism
4.1.5.5 Tolerance
4.2 Whole Analysis on Classical “X be X”Cases Under A-R Model
4.3 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusions
5.1 Major Findings
5.2 Limitations
5.3 Suggestions for Further Research
References
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]赘言“A是A”的认知语用研究[J]. 吴丽丽. 安阳师范学院学报. 2008(03)
[2]名词性同语含意的认知推理[J]. 任培红. 三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版). 2008(03)
[3]同义反复话语的认知阐释[J]. 章汉清. 淮南师范学院学报. 2008(03)
[4]“A是A”和“A是A,B是B”[J]. 孟晓慧. 泰安教育学院学报岱宗学刊. 2007(03)
[5]对“同语”辞格的重新界说[J]. 罗毅. 怀化学院学报. 2006(07)
[6]“X是X”句式的语义分析[J]. 赵家新. 现代语文. 2006(05)
[7]浅谈同义反复辞格[J]. 马彪. 求是学刊. 2005(06)
[8]多级二步明示推理及其泛式[J]. 廖巧云,侯国金. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2005(05)
[9]“非理想”的语言事实在理论建设中的地位与作用——“同义反复”的非范畴化理论解释[J]. 刘正光. 现代外语. 2005(02)
[10]析“N是N”结构[J]. 高文利,杨小卫. 三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版). 2005(02)
硕士论文
[1]“X是X”结构的多维考察[D]. 赵晓伟.南昌大学 2007
[2]现代汉语同语判断式及其相关格式研究[D]. 朱敏.上海师范大学 2005
本文编号:2961253
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2961253.html