“X嘛？”构式分析：构式与词汇的互动压制模型

发布时间：2021-01-20 06:43

　　到目前为止,语言学界对“嘛”的释义存在重大分歧,对“X嘛?”构式持有错误、混用、默认三种说法,更未见对此构式的详细论述和语料分析。本文结合Michaelis的离心压制观,Goldberg的构式压制观,Panther & Thornburg的词汇压制观,Taylor的粘合压制观提出“构式与词汇的互动压制模型”。本文还分别从北京大学汉语语言学研究中心语料库、新华网标题、光明日报网收集“X嘛?”语料516条,并运用这一模型分析其丰富的句法、语义、语用特征。出于人类使用和识解语言的需要,在抽象构式与填充词汇的结合过程中,压制现象具有普适性。本文提出的构式词汇互动压制模型可用于解释“X嘛?”构式。问句构式与句尾语气助词或代词“嘛”的关系促使双方产生互动压制,进而形成句法、语义和语用上的多样性。通过分析,我们发现:“嘛”产生于北宋,有语气助词和代词之分,按照这一标准,“X嘛?”构式可分为普通“X嘛?”构式和“X（干）嘛?”构式。按照疑问程度分类,“X嘛?”构式构成了一个强式疑问句、弱式疑问句、反问句连续统。通过构式词汇互动压制模型对“X嘛?”构式进行分析,可得出如下结论:的意义会通过互动来... 

【文章来源】：四川外国语大学重庆市

【文章页数】：112 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgments
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Motivation and Significance of the Study
    1.2 Methodology and Data Collection
    1.3 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Previous Studies on Four Types of Coercion Theories
        2.2.1 Michaelis’Endocentric and Exocentric Coercions
        2.2.2 Goldberg’s Construction Coercion
        2.2.3 Panther & Thornburg’s Lexical Coercion
        2.2.4 Taylor’s Bondedness Coercion
    2.3 Previous Studies on “X 嘛?” Construction and the Gap: Synchronical and Diachronical Studies on “X 嘛?” Construction
        2.3.1 Divergence on the Definitions of “嘛”
        2.3.2 On the Differentiation of “嘛”and “吗”as Modal Particles
        2.3.3 Rethinking the Differentiation of “嘛”and “吗”as Modal Particles
        2.3.4 Rethinking the Differentiation of “嘛”and “吗”as Pronouns
    2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Basis: Construction and Lexicon Interactive Coercion Model
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Reflection upon Four Types of Coercion Theories
        3.2.1 Extension of Michaelis’Exocentric Coercion
        3.2.2 Complementation of Goldberg’s Construction Coercion
        3.2.3 Can Panther & Thornburg’s Lexical Coercion Work Independently?
        3.2.4 Development of Taylor’s Bondedness Coercion
    3.3 Theoretical Integration: Construction and Lexicon Interactive Coercion Model
        3.3.1 Motivation of Interactive Coercion Model
        3.3.2 Research Domain of Interactive Coercion Model
        3.3.3 Mechanism of Interactive Coercion Model
    3.4 Case Study
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four Data Analysis and Discussion
    4.1 Introduction
        4.1.1 Classification Analysis on “X 嘛?”Construction
        4.1.2 Interaction between Question Construction and “嘛”
    4.2 Features of Question Construction
        4.2.1 Question Mark and Question Construction
        4.2.2 Data Distribution of “X 嘛?”Construction
    4.3 Data Analysis with Construction and Lexicon Interactive Coercion Model
        4.3.1 Rhetorical Question“X 嘛?”Construction
            4.3.1.1 Rhetorical Question “X 嘛?” in Polar Interrogative Form
            4.3.1.2 Rhetorical Question “X 嘛?” in Constituent Interrogative Form
            4.3.1.3 Rhetorical Question “X 嘛? ” in Disjunctive-negative Interrogative Form
        4.3.2 Interrogative Question “X 嘛?” Construction
            4.3.2.1 Polar Interrogative “X 嘛?” Construction
            4.3.2.2 Constituent Interrogative “X 嘛?” Construction
            4.3.2.3. Disjunctive-Negative Interrogative “X 嘛?” Construction
        4.3.3 The Interpretation of “X （干）嘛?” Construction
            4.3.3.1 Strong Interrogative “X （干）嘛?”Construction
            4.3.3.2 Weak Interrogation “X （干）嘛?” Construction
            4.3.3.3 Rhetorical Question “X （干）嘛?” Construction
    4.4 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Main Findings and Implications
    5.2 Limitations and Suggestions
References
Appendices



本文编号：2988586