明喻和隐喻的心理语言学研究
发布时间：2022-10-21 08:52
明喻和隐喻的异同,一直是心理学界争论的焦点。比较论、范畴论和概念隐喻论认为他们二者并无差异,而习俗论和适宜论却强调两者存在不同。本文赞成异同论,但与习俗论和适宜论不同的是,认为两者的异同是多元素共同作用的结果,这些因素包括:谓词的类型、本喻体之间的相似度和它们之间的意义组合、喻体对共性特征的贡献、人们对本喻体之间搭配的熟悉度等。本文首先通过实证方法证明明喻和隐喻的选择与这五个方面相关,并在实验的论证基础上提出了一种全新的异同观。 为了探究两者之间的差异,本研究选取了50对本体和喻体,就明喻和隐喻的最基本形式:A是（像） B展开讨论。太原理工大学非英语专业的一年级学生参与了四个问卷的调查,四次调查的人数累计共达332人,调查的内容包括:本喻体的倾向性形式表达,两者共性特点描述及相似度和显著性判断、喻体在相似性形成中的作用、两者搭配的熟悉度以及句子的理解难易程度判断。 结果表明:当本体为具体名词,喻体也为具体名词,且两者之间相似度较小、熟悉度不高,本喻体对喻底的贡献基本均衡,且两者的顺序在某种程度上具有一定的逆转性,其喻底大多呈现出属性类特点时,被试更倾向于选择明喻;而...
【文章页数】：178 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgments
Abstract
摘要
List of Tables and Figures
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Impetus of the study
1.2 Assumptions about simile and metaphor
1.3 Purpose and rationale of the study
1.4 Theoretical foundation of the study
1.5 Research methodology
1.6 The organization of the dissertation
Chapter 2 Definition of Simile and Metaphor and Some Related Notions
2.1 Definitions of simile and metaphor
2.1.1 Simile in relation to metaphor
2.1.2 Simile as a version of metaphor
2.2 Different names for topic and vehicle
2.3 Typical and atypical structures
2.4 Identification of simile and metaphor
2.5 Summary
Chapter 3 Comparison between Simile, Metaphor and their Literal Counterparts
3.1 Indirect process and direct process
3.2 Features of simile and metaphor vs. their literal counterparts
3.2.1 Low/high salience vs. high/high salience
3.2.2 Semantic anomaly vs. semantic literality
3.2.3 Interchangeability vs. non-interchangeability
3.2.4 Non-reversibility vs. reversibility
3.3 The use of simile and metaphor
3.4 Summary
Chapter 4 A Survey of the Relationship between Simile and Metaphor
4.1 The equivalence view
4.1.1 The comparison model
4.1.1.1 Development of the comparison model
4.1.1.2 Further studies of the comparison model
4.1.1.3 Structure-mapping theory
4.1.2 The categorization model
4.1.3 Conceptual metaphor theory
4.2 The non-equivalence view
4.2.1 The conventionality model
4.2.2 The literal base model
4.3 Empirical studies on the competing views
4.3.1 The conventionality hypothesis
4.3.2 Aptness hypothesis
4.4 Summary
Chapter 5 Research Description
5.1 Research questions
5.2 Pilot study
5.3 Design of questionnaires
5.4 Participants and role of the researcher
5.5 Data process and analysis
Chapter 6 Experiments and Analyses
6.1 Simile attributive and metaphor relational
6.1.1.E xperiment 1
6.1.2 Results and discussion
6.2 Simile less similar and metaphor more similar
6.2.1 Experiment 2
6.2.2 Results of holistic and discrete similarity rating
6.2.3 Discussion
6.3 Simile less familiar and metaphor more familiar
6.3.1 Experiment 3
6.3.2 Results and discussion
6.4 Simile more symmetric and metaphor more asymmetric
6.4.1 Experiment 4
6.4.2 Results and discussion of asymmetry ratings
6.4.3 Results and discussion of reversibility
6.5 Simile with concrete-concrete pairing and metaphor abstract- concrete pairing
6.5.1 Procedure of the study
6.5.2 Results and discussion
6.6 Summary
Chapter 7 Conclusions
7.1 Simile-metaphor distinction
7.2 Simile-metaphor overlapping
7.3 Simile-metaphor continuum
7.4 Theoretical implications
7.5 Limitations of the study
7.6 Suggestions for future research
Bibliography
Appendices
Appendix 1 Questionnaire 1
Appendix 2 Questionnaire 2
Appendix 3 Questionnaire 3
Appendix 4 Questionnaire 4
Appendix 5 Statistical Results Processed by SPSS
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]隐喻生涯模型及其解释力[J]. 龚玉苗,周榕. 外国语文. 2009(03)
[2]隐喻和转喻的区分:研究现状和分歧[J]. 张辉,杨波. 外国语文. 2009(01)
[3]隐喻政治与政治隐喻:论美国政治家的政治隐喻[J]. 陈勇,刘肇云. 外语教学. 2009(01)
[4]英汉语听觉概念隐喻的共性与个性[J]. 覃修桂. 外语学刊. 2009(01)
[5]论隐喻——指导语言学博士研究生记实[J]. 王德春. 外语学刊. 2009(01)
[6]隐喻与认知研究25年（1980—2004）:成绩、问题与展望[J]. 李福印,秦进平. 中国外语. 2007(04)
[7]论明喻和隐喻产生的先后顺序——一项以《诗经》为语料的认知研究[J]. 彭宣维. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版). 2007(03)
[8]基于模型的语用推理[J]. 徐盛桓. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2007(03)
[9]隐喻的主观性与主观化[J]. 魏在江. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2007(02)
[10]概念隐喻和语篇连贯[J]. 任绍曾. 外语教学与研究. 2006(02)
本文编号：3695324
【文章页数】：178 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgments
Abstract
摘要
List of Tables and Figures
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Impetus of the study
1.2 Assumptions about simile and metaphor
1.3 Purpose and rationale of the study
1.4 Theoretical foundation of the study
1.5 Research methodology
1.6 The organization of the dissertation
Chapter 2 Definition of Simile and Metaphor and Some Related Notions
2.1 Definitions of simile and metaphor
2.1.1 Simile in relation to metaphor
2.1.2 Simile as a version of metaphor
2.2 Different names for topic and vehicle
2.3 Typical and atypical structures
2.4 Identification of simile and metaphor
2.5 Summary
Chapter 3 Comparison between Simile, Metaphor and their Literal Counterparts
3.1 Indirect process and direct process
3.2 Features of simile and metaphor vs. their literal counterparts
3.2.1 Low/high salience vs. high/high salience
3.2.2 Semantic anomaly vs. semantic literality
3.2.3 Interchangeability vs. non-interchangeability
3.2.4 Non-reversibility vs. reversibility
3.3 The use of simile and metaphor
3.4 Summary
Chapter 4 A Survey of the Relationship between Simile and Metaphor
4.1 The equivalence view
4.1.1 The comparison model
4.1.1.1 Development of the comparison model
4.1.1.2 Further studies of the comparison model
4.1.1.3 Structure-mapping theory
4.1.2 The categorization model
4.1.3 Conceptual metaphor theory
4.2 The non-equivalence view
4.2.1 The conventionality model
4.2.2 The literal base model
4.3 Empirical studies on the competing views
4.3.1 The conventionality hypothesis
4.3.2 Aptness hypothesis
4.4 Summary
Chapter 5 Research Description
5.1 Research questions
5.2 Pilot study
5.3 Design of questionnaires
5.4 Participants and role of the researcher
5.5 Data process and analysis
Chapter 6 Experiments and Analyses
6.1 Simile attributive and metaphor relational
6.1.1.E xperiment 1
6.1.2 Results and discussion
6.2 Simile less similar and metaphor more similar
6.2.1 Experiment 2
6.2.2 Results of holistic and discrete similarity rating
6.2.3 Discussion
6.3 Simile less familiar and metaphor more familiar
6.3.1 Experiment 3
6.3.2 Results and discussion
6.4 Simile more symmetric and metaphor more asymmetric
6.4.1 Experiment 4
6.4.2 Results and discussion of asymmetry ratings
6.4.3 Results and discussion of reversibility
6.5 Simile with concrete-concrete pairing and metaphor abstract- concrete pairing
6.5.1 Procedure of the study
6.5.2 Results and discussion
6.6 Summary
Chapter 7 Conclusions
7.1 Simile-metaphor distinction
7.2 Simile-metaphor overlapping
7.3 Simile-metaphor continuum
7.4 Theoretical implications
7.5 Limitations of the study
7.6 Suggestions for future research
Bibliography
Appendices
Appendix 1 Questionnaire 1
Appendix 2 Questionnaire 2
Appendix 3 Questionnaire 3
Appendix 4 Questionnaire 4
Appendix 5 Statistical Results Processed by SPSS
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]隐喻生涯模型及其解释力[J]. 龚玉苗,周榕. 外国语文. 2009(03)
[2]隐喻和转喻的区分:研究现状和分歧[J]. 张辉,杨波. 外国语文. 2009(01)
[3]隐喻政治与政治隐喻:论美国政治家的政治隐喻[J]. 陈勇,刘肇云. 外语教学. 2009(01)
[4]英汉语听觉概念隐喻的共性与个性[J]. 覃修桂. 外语学刊. 2009(01)
[5]论隐喻——指导语言学博士研究生记实[J]. 王德春. 外语学刊. 2009(01)
[6]隐喻与认知研究25年（1980—2004）:成绩、问题与展望[J]. 李福印,秦进平. 中国外语. 2007(04)
[7]论明喻和隐喻产生的先后顺序——一项以《诗经》为语料的认知研究[J]. 彭宣维. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版). 2007(03)
[8]基于模型的语用推理[J]. 徐盛桓. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2007(03)
[9]隐喻的主观性与主观化[J]. 魏在江. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2007(02)
[10]概念隐喻和语篇连贯[J]. 任绍曾. 外语教学与研究. 2006(02)
本文编号：3695324
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/3695324.html
