走出语音中心主义——对汉民族文字性质的哲学思考

发布时间：2018-02-22 11:42

本文关键词： 汉语文字文字学语言哲学语音中心主义逻格斯中心主义　出处：《复旦学报(社会科学版)》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：西方的语言理论认为,语言是思维的表征,文字只是语言的记录,而不是语言。这一理论的哲学基础是西方的逻格斯中心主义:在场先于而且优于不在场,说出的言语是在场,书写的文字是不在场,因此,言语比文字重要,文字是言语的奴仆。这种认为文字附属于口语、口语优于文字的观点,就是语音中心主义。尽管中西方学者、知识分子以及政治家们可能并不了解或接受这些语言理论,但他们在汉语文字性质问题上的看法,与这些理论殊途同归,不谋而合,对认识汉语文字的性质以及制订语言政策产生了相当大的影响。从语音中心论的兴起分析其在历史上对汉语文字研究的影响,以及中西学者关于汉语文字的持久争论,可以揭示其如何影响了对汉语文字性质和特征的理解以及语言政策的制定,并进而为准确把握汉语的本质提供认识论方面的概念性思考。
[Abstract]:The western language theory holds that language is the representation of thought and that words are only a record of language, not language. The philosophical basis of this theory is the logos centrism of the West: the presence is prior to, and superior to, the absence, and the utterance is the presence. Written text is not present, therefore, speech is more important than writing, writing is the servant of speech. This view that words are subordinate to spoken language and spoken language is superior to writing is phonological centrism. Although Chinese and Western scholars, Intellectuals and politicians may not understand or accept these theories, but their views on the nature of Chinese characters coincide with those theories. It has a great influence on the understanding of the nature of Chinese characters and the formulation of language policies. From the rise of phonological centrism, this paper analyzes its influence on the study of Chinese characters in history, as well as the long-lasting debate between Chinese and Western scholars on Chinese characters. It can reveal how it affects the understanding of the nature and characteristics of Chinese characters and the formulation of language policies, and then provides epistemological conceptual thinking for accurately grasping the essence of Chinese.
【作者单位】：扬州大学外国语学院;德州大学人文艺术学院;
【分类号】：H1-0

【参考文献】