《非常静距离》中的会话修正研究

发布时间：2018-02-24 16:39

本文关键词： 会话修正会话修正类型会话修正策略交际效果　出处：《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：会话修正作为会话分析的重要组成成分之一,最初由Schegloff,Jefferson and Sacks(1977)提出,并引起了国内外学者的广泛关注。修正通常发生在当前交流中存在阻碍时。修正是一种排除各种会话中出现的阻碍以保证交际顺利进行的有效方式。虽然会话修正方面的研究已经取得了显著的成果,但这一语言现象仍然需要进一步的探究,尤其是对不同语境下会话修正现象的研究。在前人会话修正研究的基础上,本文对具有代表性的汉语娱乐性脱口秀节目《非常静距离》中的会话修正类型,会话修正策略以及会话修正实现的交际效果进行了实证的探究。本研究采取会话分析的研究方法,以Schegloff等人(1977)提出的会话修正模式为指导,并结合了质化和量化的研究方法。通过对数据进行系统详细的分析,我们在本研究中得到三个主要发现第一,本研究发现在选择的20期节目中,一共有382处修正案例,包括250处自我修正案例和132处他人修正案例。四类主要的修正类型是:自我引导的自我修正,他人引导的自我修正,自我引导的他人修正以及他人引导的他人修正。其中自我引导的自我修正所占的比例最高。此外,对自我修正以及自我引导的偏好现象在本研究中也有所体现。尽管研究结果与Schegloff等人(1977)的相似,但仍有不同之处。Schegloff等人的研究中仅存在一小部分的他人修正,而在本研究中,他人修正却占据了不容忽视的比例。第二,对于会话修正策略,本文区分了八种自我修正策略以及七种他人修正策略。在自我修正中,重复和重述策略是说话者最常采用的,两类策略几乎占据了一半的比例,而同位语策略则是比例最少的。在他人修正中,说话者最倾向于完成策略,所占比例最高,而替换策略比例最低。本文还发现在修正策略的使用上,自我修正和他人修正既有相同之处也有不同之处。第三,本文主要从信息传递,娱乐性以及人际交流三个方面探究会话修正产生的交际效果。在信息传递中,会话修正可以保证信息的准确性,恰当性,流利性,完整性,帮助避免误解以及扩展句法内容来实现多重交际目标。此外,就娱乐性而言,会话修正有时会产生幽默效果并且增强交际的互动性。在人际交流中,会话修正有助于保全说话者的面子,还能促使节目中的说话者进行有效交际。作者希望本文能够深化对会话修正现象的研究并扩大研究的范围,同时也希望本文能为未来进一步的研究提供一些启示,以便更好地从其他角度研究不同语境中的会话修正现象。
[Abstract]:As an important component of conversational analysis, session correction was first proposed by Schegloff Jefferson and Sacksn 1977. Correction usually occurs when there is an obstacle in the current communication. Revision is an effective way to eliminate obstacles in various conversations in order to ensure the smooth communication. Although conversational revision is an effective way to ensure the smooth progress of communication. Positive research has achieved remarkable results. However, this linguistic phenomenon still needs to be further explored, especially the study of conversational correction in different contexts. This paper deals with the types of conversational corrections in the typical Chinese entertainment talk show "very quiet distance". The strategies of conversational correction and the communicative effect of conversational revision are explored empirically. This study adopts the conversational analysis method and is guided by the conversational correction model proposed by Schegloff et al. And combined with qualitative and quantitative research methods. Through systematic and detailed analysis of the data, we got three main findings in this study. First, this study found that in the 20 selected programs, there were 382 revised cases. There are 250 cases of self-correction and 132 cases of correction of others. The four main types of correction are self-directed self-correction, self-correction led by others. Self-directed revision of others and others of others. The proportion of self-directed self-correction is the highest. In addition, Although the results of this study are similar to those of Schegloff et al. (1977), there are still some differences. Schegloff et al. Second, this paper distinguishes eight kinds of self-correcting strategies from seven kinds of others' strategies. In self-revision, repetition and restatement are the most common strategies used by the speaker. The two types of strategies account for almost half of the total, while appositive strategies are the least. Among other corrections, the speaker is the most likely to complete the strategy, with the highest proportion. This paper also finds that there are similarities and differences between self-correction and other modification in the use of revision strategies. Third, this paper mainly from the information transmission, In information transmission, conversation correction can ensure the accuracy, appropriateness, fluency and completeness of information. Help avoid misunderstandings and expand syntactic content to achieve multiple communicative goals. Moreover, in terms of entertainment, conversational modification can sometimes produce humorous effects and enhance communication interactivity. Conversation correction helps to save the face of the speaker and promote effective communication among the speakers. The author hopes that this paper can deepen the study of the phenomenon of conversational correction and expand the scope of the study. At the same time, it is hoped that this paper can provide some enlightenment for further research in the future, so as to better study the phenomenon of conversational correction in different contexts from other perspectives.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】