批评话语分析视角下中美媒体关于中国“一带一路”新闻报道的对比研究

发布时间：2018-03-01 01:19

本文关键词： 批评话语分析新闻一带一路意识形态　出处：《外交学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2013年,习主席首次提出“一带一路”。此后,“一带一路”便在世界范围内成为了一个热点词汇,并在新闻界和学术界引起极大关注。本文收集数十篇中美主流媒体关于“一带一路”的新闻报道,从批评话语分析的角度进行对比研究。以费尔克劳夫的三维分析法为理论框架,采用韩礼德系统功能语法中的部分语言工具,揭示中美两国在“一带一路”问题上话语和意识形态方面的差异。本文将分三个阶段展开:描述、解读和解释。在第一阶段,分析词汇分类、及物性、情态和标记主位;第二阶段,就报道模式和新闻来源进行互文性分析;最后,对形成新闻报道的经济、政治和文化环境进行详尽阐释,解释新闻语篇中嵌入不同意识形态的原因。通过以上语言工具对收集的新闻样本进行分析,本文发现中方对于推进“一带一路”充满自信,而又不失谦逊。尽管在技术层面仍有待改进,但中方媒体积极采用新闻话语为“一带一路”铺平道路。相比之下,美方对于这一计划持怀疑甚至敌对态度,尖锐的反对言辞通过很多语言工具在美国报纸中得到体现。事实上,经济、政治和文化现实可以对两国间的话语和意识形态差异做出解释。本研究的意义有三层。首先,本文试图呼吁学术界关注从批评话语分析角度对“一带一路”进行研究。这不仅强调了以语言学方法研究这一热点话题,同时也丰富了批评话语分析在新闻话语中的应用。第二,本文就国内媒体如何提升自身话语权提出建议。通过更好地使用语言工具,国内媒体可以更高效地为中国打造积极形象,并助力“一带一路”这一宏大计划的实现。第三,话语所描述的不过是一种版本的现实,它是意识形态的传播工具。本文提醒读者须采用批判性思维,辨识相互矛盾的表述,把握现实中的真相。
[Abstract]:In 2013, President Xi proposed "Belt and Road" for the first time. Since then, "Belt and Road" has become a hot word in the world. And has aroused great concern in the press and academia. This paper collects dozens of news reports about Belt and Road from the mainstream media of China and the United States. A comparative study is made from the perspective of critical discourse analysis. Based on the theoretical framework of Faircroft's three-dimensional analysis, part of the linguistic tools in Halliday's systemic functional grammar are adopted. This paper will be divided into three stages: description, interpretation and interpretation. In the first stage, we analyze lexical classification, transitivity, modality and marked theme; In the second stage, intertextuality analysis is carried out on the reporting mode and news sources. Finally, the economic, political and cultural environment in which news reports are formed is explained in detail. Explain the reasons why different ideologies are embedded in news discourses. By analyzing the news samples collected through the above language tools, this paper finds that the Chinese side is full of confidence in promoting "Belt and Road". Although there is still room for technical improvement, the Chinese media are actively using news words to pave the way for Belt and Road. By contrast, the US side is sceptical and even hostile about the plan. In fact, economic, political and cultural realities can explain the discourse and ideological differences between the two countries. The significance of this study is threefold. This paper attempts to appeal to the academic community to focus on the study of Belt and Road from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, which not only emphasizes the hot topic of linguistic research. At the same time, it also enriches the application of critical discourse analysis in news discourse. Secondly, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to improve domestic media's right to speak. The domestic media can more efficiently create a positive image for China and help realize the grand plan of "Belt and Road." third, what the words describe is nothing more than a version of reality. This paper reminds readers to adopt critical thinking, identify contradictory expressions and grasp the truth in reality.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H15;H315

【相似文献】