当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 语言艺术论文 >

《新华成语词典》中情感成语的批评隐喻分析

发布时间:2018-03-03 04:13

  本文选题:批评隐喻分析 切入点:概念隐喻 出处:《山东科技大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:隐喻的研究由来已久,从范围和方法层面可以将国内外的研究概括为隐喻的修辞学研究、隐喻的语义学研究和隐喻的多学科研究,后者着重强调认知语言学领域的研究。Lakoff和Johnson在1980年合著的《我们赖以生存的隐喻》一书,开创了隐喻研究的新纪元,标志着隐喻研究由传统的修辞功能领域转向认知功能领域。Charteris-Black在2004年提出的批评隐喻分析更是被视为批评话语分析的一种新方法,并且为隐喻分析提供了新思路。它综合运用认知语言学、批评话语分析、语料库研究和语用学知识,弥补了概念隐喻分析在语用学领域的不足。目前批评隐喻分析的研究热点主要集中在具有明显意识形态的政治语篇,例如总统演讲和政府工作报告,但对表达感情的情感成语研究较少。情感是日常生活中一种普遍性的人类体验,并与认知互为影响,为了形象生动地表达情感,人们往往将其隐喻化,因此基于概念隐喻理论分析情感成语的现象也十分普遍。然而情感成语的隐喻研究往往只注重分析隐喻的映射机制,并着重对英汉情感成语在隐喻表达上的共性和个性进行阐述,并没有结合语篇进行深入分析。综合上述原因,本文选取《新华成语词典》中的情感成语作为研究对象,基于批评隐喻分析理论和概念隐喻理论,并结合成语的出处作为语境深入分析情感成语背后表达的情感态度及意识形态,弥补了情感成语隐喻分析在语用研究层面的不足。经过分析可知,《新华成语词典》中主要存在六类情感成语隐喻,它们分别是身体隐喻,方位隐喻、温度隐喻、颜色隐喻、容器隐喻和动植物隐喻。情感成语的批评隐喻分析过程遵循隐喻识别、隐喻阐释和隐喻说明三个步骤。同时本文还结合成语出处作为语境,分析情感成语的隐喻构建机制,领会作者表达的情感态度,揭示隐喻隐藏的意识形态功能和社会价值,比如情感激发、信息筛选以及评价功能。利用批评隐喻分析理论对《新华成语词典》中的情感成语进行分析不仅弥补了概念隐喻理论在分析上的不足,拓宽了批评隐喻分析的研究范围,还为情感成语的隐喻研究开拓了新思路,而且有利于人们利用成语更好地表达情感,抒发情怀。
[Abstract]:The study of metaphor has a long history. From the aspect of scope and method, it can be summarized as the rhetorical study of metaphor, the semantic study of metaphor and the multidisciplinary study of metaphor. The latter emphasizes the research in the field of cognitive linguistics. Lakoff and Johnson co-wrote metaphor for our existence in 1980, which marks a new era in metaphor study. The metaphorical analysis proposed by Charteris-Black in 2004 is regarded as a new approach to critical discourse analysis. It combines cognitive linguistics, critical discourse analysis, corpus research and pragmatic knowledge. It makes up for the shortcomings of conceptual metaphor analysis in the field of pragmatics. At present, the research focus of critical metaphor analysis is mainly on political discourse with obvious ideology, such as presidential speech and government work report. However, there are few studies on emotional idioms to express emotion. Emotion is a universal human experience in daily life, and it has mutual influence with cognition. In order to express emotion vividly, people often use metaphor to express emotion. Therefore, it is also very common to analyze affective idioms based on conceptual metaphor theory. However, the metaphorical studies of affective idioms tend to focus only on the mapping mechanism of metaphors. It also focuses on the generality and individuality of Chinese and English affective idioms in metaphorical expression, and does not make a thorough analysis of the text. For the above reasons, this paper chooses the emotional idioms in Xinhua idiom Dictionary as the object of study. Based on the critical metaphorical analysis theory and conceptual metaphor theory, and combining the provenance of idioms as context, this paper deeply analyzes the emotional attitude and ideology behind the emotional idioms. The analysis shows that there are six kinds of affective idiom metaphors in Xinhua idiom Dictionary, which are body metaphor, orientation metaphor, temperature metaphor and color metaphor. Container metaphor and animal and plant metaphors. The critical metaphor analysis of affective idioms follows three steps: metaphorical recognition, metaphorical interpretation and metaphorical explanation. At the same time, this paper analyzes the metaphorical construction mechanism of affective idioms in the context of idiom provenance. Understanding the emotional attitudes expressed by the author, revealing the hidden ideological functions and social values of metaphor, such as emotional arousal, The analysis of emotional idioms in Xinhua idiom Dictionary not only makes up for the deficiency of conceptual metaphor theory, but also widens the research scope of critical metaphor analysis. It also opens up new ideas for metaphor study of affective idioms and helps people express their feelings and feelings better by using idioms.
【学位授予单位】:山东科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H15

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 孙炬;房薇薇;;批评隐喻分析视角下奥巴马2016年国情咨文分析[J];鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年05期

2 张楠;;《纽约时报》对中国经济增长放缓报道的批评隐喻分析[J];语文学刊(外语教育教学);2015年07期

3 凤群;;隐喻和政治神话的实现:美国总统演讲的批评隐喻分析——从里根到奥巴马[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2013年01期

4 林宝珠;;新修辞学视角下的隐喻批评性分析[J];长春工程学院学报(社会科学版);2012年02期

5 王维民;黄娅;;从概念隐喻看政府的意识形态与执政理念——以国务院《政府工作报告》(1978~2011)为例[J];西南交通大学学报(社会科学版);2012年03期

6 张蕾;;隐喻研究的批评话语分析视角[J];山东外语教学;2011年05期

7 孙亚;;教育公平话语的积极隐喻分析——以《同在蓝天下——怎么看教育公平》为例[J];华文教学与研究;2011年03期

8 裴霜霜;周榕;;以自然语篇和语料库为基础的隐喻研究——《语篇中的隐喻》述介[J];外语教学与研究;2011年02期

9 赵雪梅;;隐喻的批评性分析——批评隐喻分析[J];外语艺术教育研究;2010年03期

10 朱炜;;试论隐喻的意识形态性[J];南京社会科学;2010年07期



本文编号:1559474

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/1559474.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户835ea***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com