魏晋南北朝美学“形”“神”范畴的语法分析
发布时间:2018-04-10 20:54
本文选题:魏晋南北朝美学 + 形 ; 参考:《山东社会科学》2017年07期
【摘要】:庄子和慧远等人对"形""神"概念的使用是不适当的,从而导致人们对"形""神"意义及二者关系的理解存在错误和混乱。"形""神"关系是逻辑和概念上的必然关系而不是在经验事实中的并存关系。"传神"的意义在语法上已经蕴含在"写形"的概念中,因此"神似"即"形似"。对"形""神"概念的误用通常有两个表现:一是用"形""神"分别指称两个不同的对象或一个对象的两个部分,这导致人们把"传神"理解成与"写形"不同的创作方法。二是用"形""神"分别指称对象的特征和主体的精神,把"形似"理解成对象的特征,把"神似"理解成"风骨"和"风力"。事实上刘勰和钟嵘所说的"形似"同时就是对象的"神似",而"风骨""风力"则是主体的思想情感形态。
[Abstract]:The use of the concept of "form" and "God" by Zhuangzi and Huiyuan and others is inappropriate, which leads to the misunderstanding and confusion of the meaning of "form" and "God" and the relationship between them. "The "God" relationship is a logical and conceptual necessity rather than a co-existence in empirical facts.The meaning of "vivid" has been embodied in the concept of "writing form" in grammar, so "divine resemblance" is "likeness".The misuse of the concept of "form" and "god" usually has two manifestations: one is to refer to two different objects or two parts of one object by using "form" and "god", which leads people to interpret "evocative" as a creative method different from "writing form".The second is to use the "form" and "God" to refer to the characteristics of the object and the spirit of the subject, to understand the "likeness" as the characteristic of the object, and to interpret the "likeness of the god" as the "wind strength" and "wind force".In fact, Liu Xie and Zhong Rong's "likeness" is the object's "god similarity" at the same time, while "wind strength" and "wind force" are the subject's ideological and emotional forms.
【作者单位】: 青岛大学文学院;山东社会科学院文化产业研究所;
【分类号】:H131
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 陈嘉映;;谈谈维特根斯坦的“哲学语法”(续)[J];世界哲学;2011年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 赵建章;赵迎芳;;魏晋南北朝美学“形”“神”范畴的语法分析[J];山东社会科学;2017年07期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 杝嘉映;;普遍性:同与通[J];中国文化;2010年01期
2 陈嘉映;;语言转向之后[J];江苏社会科学;2009年05期
3 陈嘉映;;哲学之为穷理[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2008年06期
,本文编号:1732875
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/1732875.html