《史记索隐》与《史记正义》的训诂比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-17 22:01

本文选题：《史记索隐》 + 《史记正义》　；参考：《宁夏大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：《史记》通篇气势恢宏,是我国第一部纪传体通史。“三家注”即刘宋裴殐《史记集解》、司马贞《史记索隐》、张守节《史记正义》(以下简称《集解》《索隐》《正义》),是《史记》注释的不朽佳作。“三家注”成书年代不一,注释的侧重点有别,《索隐》《正义》在释词探义等方面显有区别,具有一定的可比性。本文就此对二疏进行解析比较,以求得全面的认识,进而为窥探唐代的训诂面貌提供有价值的线索及依据。文章通过对《索隐》《正义》二疏进行全面考察探究,罗列二者所用训诂术语,总结概括其训诂内容及方法,分析两者在具体内容的区别,探讨二者的具体关系,并详加论证,在此基础上,对词义、句义、断句分析的精准程度作出一定的判断推究,在释义、地名考释等方面就孰更为妥当这一问题进行较为细致的考辨。
[Abstract]:The whole history of history is the first general history of history in China."three Notes", namely Liu Song Pei Pai, Shi Ji Ji Ji Jie, Sima Zhen, Shi Ji Su Yin, Zhang Shoujie, Shi Ji Justice (hereinafter referred to as "Ji Yi] < Su Yin] < Justice > Li, are the immortal masterpieces of" Records of History "annotation.The three Notes are of different ages and the emphasis of the annotation is different, and the explanation of the meaning of the words is quite different from the justice, which is comparable to a certain degree.In this paper, the author makes an analysis and comparison of the two parts in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding and provide valuable clues and basis for the exploration of the exegesis of the Tang Dynasty.Through the comprehensive investigation of "Suoyin" and "Justice", this paper lists the exegetical terms used by them, summarizes the contents and methods of their exegesis, analyzes the differences between the two in specific contents, probes into the concrete relationship between them, and gives a detailed demonstration.On this basis, the accuracy of the analysis of word meaning, sentence meaning, break sentence to a certain degree of judgment and research, in the interpretation of geographical names on the more appropriate aspects of this issue is more detailed research.
【学位授予单位】：宁夏大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H131

【参考文献】