《尔雅》与《广雅》动物名比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-23 10:43

本文选题：《尔雅》 + 《广雅》　；参考：《内蒙古师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：《尔雅》是我国古代第一部同义词词典,涉及字义词义、人事生活、天文地理、动物植物等广泛内容,是我国古代的百科全书。《广雅》博采汉人笺注、《三苍》、《说文》、《方言》诸书,增广《尔雅》所未备,故名《广雅》。当前针对《尔雅》的研究成果较为丰富,各方面的研究很多,有关《尔雅》中的动物名词的研究还比较欠缺。而《广雅》虽然也非常重要并且有价值,但是相对而言研究者没有《尔雅》那么多,关于《广雅》动物名词的研究更加微乎其微。本文以《广雅》和《尔雅》中的动物名为研究对象,运用定量分析、定性分析等方法进行了以下五个方面的研究:一、《尔雅》与《广雅》动物名的研究现状、研究意义及研究方法。二、对《尔雅》与《广雅》中的动物名词汇构成进行比较研究,找出《尔雅》与《广雅》动物名词汇构成的相同特点和不同特点。《尔雅》动物名单音词略多于复音词。《广雅》动物名复音词占据主要地位。三、对《尔雅》与《广雅》中的动物名训诂方式进行比较研究,得出结论:训诂方式主要分为以词训词、以语训词、综合式和其他四种。四、对《尔雅》与《广雅》中的动物名释义内容进行比较分析,找出其中丰富的释义内涵,涉及同义词的辨释和一个词的释义两部分。五、《尔雅》和《广雅》动物名都有重要贡献,同时也存在一些不足。本节主要揭示了其在对动物进行分类、收录动物词词群、对动物词进行解释的贡献,以及在分类的混乱和释义、训诂术语的不完善。通过对《尔雅》和《广雅》中的动物名进行比较研究,可以看出不同时代对同一动物的认知情况,也可以反映出同一时代对不同动物的认知情况。通过对这两本书中的动物名深入而细致地梳理、分析,我们可以掌握中国古代动物的基本面貌,同时对中国古人同动物的关系,以及古人对动物的态度和古人的思维都有一定的了解。
[Abstract]:Erya is the first dictionary of synonyms in ancient China, covering a wide range of contents, such as meaning, human life, astronomical geography, animals and plants, etc. "Guangya" is an encyclopedia of ancient China. "Guangya" is an ancient encyclopedia. "Guangya" is called "Guangya" because of its extensive notes on Han people's notes, "San Cang", "Shuo Wen", "dialect" and other books that have not been prepared. At present, there are a lot of researches on the animal nouns in Erya. Although Guangya is also very important and valuable, there are not as many researchers as Erya, and the research on animal nouns is even less. In this paper, the animal names in Guangya and Erya are taken as the research objects, and the following five aspects are studied by means of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis: first, the present research situation of animal names in < Erya > and < Guangya >. Research significance and method. Second, a comparative study of the lexical composition of animal names in "Erya" and "Guangya", To find out the same characteristics and different characteristics of the animal name words of < Erya > and < Guangya >. The monosyllabic words of < Erya > animal name are slightly more than polysyllabic words, and the animal name polysyllabic words occupy the main position. Thirdly, the author makes a comparative study on the exegetical modes of animal names in Erya and Guangya, and draws a conclusion that the exegetical modes are mainly divided into four types: ci exegesis, verbal admonition, Synthetical and other four kinds of exegesis. Fourthly, the author makes a comparative analysis of the interpretation of animal names in "Erya" and "Guangya", and finds out the rich connotations of animal names, which involve the interpretation of synonyms and the interpretation of a word. Fifth, both the animal name and the animal name have important contributions, but there are also some shortcomings. This section mainly reveals its contribution to the classification of animals, the collection of animal word groups, the explanation of animal words, the confusion and interpretation of classification, and the imperfections of exegesis terms. Through the comparative study of animal names in < Erya > and "Guangya", we can see the cognition of the same animal in different times, and can also reflect the cognition of different animals in the same time. By combing and analyzing the animal names in these two books, we can grasp the basic features of the animals in ancient China, and at the same time, we can understand the relationship between the ancient Chinese and the animals. And the ancients attitude to animals and the ancients thinking have a certain understanding.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H131

【相似文献】