《100年汉语新词新语大辞典》按语研究

发布时间：2018-04-27 21:52

本文选题：《100年汉语新词新语大辞典》 + 按语　；参考：《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：《100年汉语新词新语大辞典》(以下简称《大辞典》)加按语,主要说明词语的由来与构成,介绍词语产生的社会背景或相关信息,一定程度上提升了辞典的实用价值。本文拟从内部和外部、纵向与横向入手,对《大辞典》中的按语进行多角度探究,从辞书学角度审视按语,总结按语编写的规律与得失,初步探讨按语编写规范问题。本文共分为五个部分:第一章简要介绍《大辞典》按语及其研究价值,指出其成就与不足。说明本文的研究思路、研究目的与意义、研究方法。第二章根据按语的内容和性质,将按语分为溯源类、辨析类、提示说明类、补充释义类及综合类等五类,分析每类按语的特点。再举例说明按语所存在的缺漏、与释义混淆、与释义失衡三个问题。最后,归纳《大辞典》按语的总体特征。第三章主要进行纵向比较研究,将《大辞典》分别与《辞通》《王力古汉语字典》作比较,察其异同,从《辞通》《王力古汉语字典》的视角审视《大辞典》按语。具体说,与《辞通》相比,《大辞典》按语在体例、编写方法、内容质量等三方面与其存在差距;与《王力古汉语字典》相比,又有按语内容及其分布、编写方法上的差别。最后,以此为基础总结《大辞典》按语的得失,并分析其成因。第四章对《大辞典》按语进行评价,概括出《大辞典》按语的四个特点,即补充性、时代性、综合性与实用性。同时,结合实例总结出《大辞典》按语编写的部分规律,由此,初步探讨了辞典按语编写规范问题,并相应地提出了建议。第五章梳理前文内容,总结本文的创新与不足,并提出今后继续研究的设想。
[Abstract]:< 100 years Chinese New words and New words Dictionary > (hereinafter referred to as "Big Dictionary") with notes, mainly explains the origin and composition of words, introduces the social background or related information of words, to a certain extent, improves the practical value of the dictionary. This article is intended to start with internal and external, vertical and horizontal, to explore the notes in the Great Dictionary from various angles, examine the notes from the perspective of lexicography, sum up the rules, gains and losses of the compilation of the notes, and preliminarily discuss the standardization of the compilation of the notes. This paper is divided into five parts: the first chapter briefly introduces the Great Dictionary and its research value, points out its achievements and shortcomings. This paper explains the research ideas, research purposes and significance, research methods. According to the content and nature of the notes, the second chapter divides the notes into five categories: traceability, discrimination, explanation, supplementation and synthesis, and analyzes the characteristics of each kind of notes. Examples are given to illustrate three problems: omission, confusion with interpretation and unbalance between interpretation and interpretation. Finally, the general characteristics of the notes of the Dictionary are summarized. The third chapter mainly carries on the longitudinal comparison research, compares the Big Dictionary with "Citong" and "Wang Li Ancient Chinese Dictionary" respectively, examines its similarities and differences, examines the "Big Dictionary" from the angle of view of < Citong > < Wang Li Ancient Chinese Dictionary >. In particular, compared with Citong, there are differences in the style, writing method and content quality of the annotated words, and the differences in the content, distribution and writing methods of the annotated words compared with the "Wang Li Ancient Chinese Dictionary". Finally, this paper summarizes the gains and losses of the notes and analyzes the causes. The fourth chapter evaluates the notes of the Dictionary, and generalizes the four characteristics of the notes, that is, complementarity, epochal, comprehensiveness and practicability. At the same time, the author sums up some rules of the compilation of the notes of the Dictionary with examples, and discusses the standardization of the compilation of the notes of the Dictionary, and puts forward some suggestions accordingly. Chapter five summarizes the innovation and deficiency of this paper, and puts forward some ideas for further research.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136

【相似文献】