虚假礼貌中语用身份的建构研究

发布时间：2018-05-01 09:10

本文选题：虚假礼貌 + 身份建构　；参考：《华侨大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近三十年来,礼貌和不礼貌现象日渐成为语用学研究的关注热点。虚假礼貌是介于两者之间的一个模糊概念,但却未能引起语用学界的广泛关注和重视。现有对虚假礼貌的研究主要聚焦于虚假礼貌的实现方式(李成团、冉永平,2014)和构成结构(Taylor,2015),对其与身份的关系及其语用功能鲜有阐述。本研究中,虚假礼貌指既遵循至少一条礼貌原则准则,又对听话人产生面子威胁行为的话语。研究收集了中国电视剧《乡村爱情》中的85例虚假礼貌会话作为研究语料,结合语用身份的动态选择(陈新仁,2013a)与不礼貌回应策略(Culpeper et al.,2003),聚焦虚假礼貌的身份建构研究,对其身份建构的类别、话语实践及语用功能进行分析。本研究尝试回答以下四个问题:(1)虚假礼貌中,发话者建构了何种语用身份?(2)虚假礼貌的身份建构中,话语实践是如何体现的?(3)虚假礼貌中的身份建构具有何种语用功能?(4)听话者如何回应虚假礼貌中的身份建构?研究发现,虚假礼貌中:(1)按照出现频率,发话者依次建构了夸赞者、移情者、建议者、客气者、致谢者、低等者、亲密者七种语用身份;(2)发话者通过称呼语、语法选择和词汇选择来建构相关身份。称呼语中,除了普遍使用第二人称“你”,发话者更倾向于使用对方名和头衔去建构语用身份;语法选择中,除去陈述句的大量使用,反问句更多被用来建构身份,尤其是移情者身份。对比起特殊疑问句,发话者更倾向于使用一般疑问句建构赞赏者、建议者和客气者身份;词汇选择中,发话者均采用积极词汇来实现虚假礼貌;(3)发话者分别实现了胁迫功能、娱乐功能、传递负面情绪功能、避免直接冲突功能四种语用功能;(4)听话者更倾向于对虚假礼貌中的身份建构给出反对或接受的回应,而不是保持沉默。研究还发现,特定的语用身份与回应策略之间并没有对应关系。本研究不仅丰富了虚假礼貌的相关研究,增强了身份建构理论的阐释力。另外,本研究有利于交际者了解身份在言语产出和理解中的作用,更好地促进人际交流。
[Abstract]:In the past three decades, politeness and impoliteness have become the focus of pragmatics. False politeness is a vague concept between them, but it has not attracted much attention in pragmatics. The existing researches on false politeness mainly focus on the realization of false politeness (Li Chengduan, ran Yongping 2014) and the structure of false politeness, Tayloran 2015. The relationship between false politeness and identity and its pragmatic functions are seldom discussed. In this study, false politeness refers to utterances which not only follow at least one principle of politeness, but also threaten the face of the hearer. The study collected 85 cases of false politeness conversation in Chinese TV series "country Love" as the research data, combined with the dynamic choice of pragmatic identity (Chen Xinreng "2013a") and the impolite response strategy" Culpeper et al. "2003, focusing on the identity construction of false politeness. The category, discourse practice and pragmatic function of its identity construction are analyzed. The present study attempts to answer the following four questions: 1) in the case of false politeness, what pragmatic identity does the speaker construct? What is the pragmatic function of identity construction in false politeness? (4) how do hearers respond to identity construction in false politeness? The study found that in false politeness (1) according to the frequency of occurrence, the speaker constructed seven pragmatic identities of praise, empathy, suggestion, politeness, thank you, low class, intimate person in turn. Grammatical selection and lexical selection are used to construct relevant identities. In addition to the universal use of the second person as "you", speakers tend to use each other's names and titles to construct their pragmatic identities. In grammatical choice, aside from the extensive use of declarative sentences, rhetorical questions are more often used to construct identity. Especially the identity of the transferee. In contrast to special questions, speakers tend to use general questions to construct their identities as admirers, proponents and politers; in lexical selection, speakers use positive words to realize false politeness. Entertainment function, transfer negative emotion function, avoid direct conflict function four pragmatic functions: hearer is more inclined to give a negative or accepted response to the identity construction in false politeness than to remain silent. The study also finds that there is no correspondence between specific pragmatic identity and response strategies. This study not only enriches the study of false politeness, but also strengthens the interpretation of identity construction theory. In addition, this study helps communicators to understand the role of identity in speech production and understanding, and to promote interpersonal communication.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】